Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
But yes, Nietzsche was one of the few atheists intellectually capable and honest enough to see this problem coming and try to tackle it. Which is why I'll always have a soft spot for him, despite him being a heathen who accused Christ of being "too womanly"
It's been years since I've read any of his work but the guy was surprisingly spot on about a lot of things. I like to think if he were alive today he'd popular for his scathing criticism of basically everything.
 
That makes sense.
But if someone has a higher than random chance of passing on a hereditary illness is it not better that they don't breed?
Like look at some of the parents in Tard Baby General, Gwen Hartley is a perfect example, they have one fuck up, are told that the chance of another one is extreme, but then continue to pump out potato babies.
Eugenics based on Genetic Engineering is out of our reach at the minute, we don't have the knowledge of how genes work and interact with each other, (we're a long way from breeding Astartes or Nietzsche's Ubermenche), but I don't think it's a bad thing to try and eradicate hereditary problems, whether sterilization is better than abortion for achieving this is something for wiser minds than I.
Today's hereditary illness is tomorrow's evolutionary survival tool. As dumb as Star Trek 5(the search for whales) is it has a salient point. You have no idea what the future will hold and what species, or in this case collection of genes, will be needed in the future.
 
1656180987759.png
I always though Christians were being ridiculous when they said without God and religious institutions all morality would be jettisoned, but it looks like they were actually right - without the threat of divine hellfire, a significant fraction of people will roast their own children on a spit and celebrate doing so as empowerment.
It's like those stories so many people have about meeting "Atheist preachers". Hell, even I've met one. They're all men who may lack or have lost faith in their religion, but genuinely believe that it is the best way to help people. They take that shepherd role very seriously.
 
Would you subject them to having their baby mutilated, have its head crushed and liquefied and then have its bloody remains dragged out of them with tweezers? How is that less traumatizing than giving birth to a living baby?
So you have no idea what an abortion is and think it's a Wes Craven movie?
You can just take a pill and the little amount of cells just unattached itself. No tweezers no blood, No head. The woman may feel a bit shitty due to the pill, it's just a question of remaining in bed for a bit.
 
Last edited:
Lmao Muh Religion, I’m not even a strict Christian, I’m agnostic at best, I’m just not exactly comfortable for allowing literal rape victims who possibly never wanted children in their lives not wanted to be forced into the pressures of childbirth because some pedo cunt impregnated them with an unwanted child. If you are a woman of ill repute or are promiscuous and sleep around a lot deliberately getting pregnant than yes, you brought this upon yourself.

But don’t punish people further by forcing them to have children brought onto them by horrible circumstances, being against abortion is fine, I get it, it’s your body and you should take care of it. But in cases where it’s literally forced upon them through horrific means I think there should be exceptions for children at least? Don’t you?
It's not humane or merciful to trick young girls and women into becoming murderers.
 
Many states allow abortions up to 12 weeks. Most women are probably aware they are pregnant by then. You are allowed to get it for any reason at all within certain windows, it just gets restricted after a certain amount of time. Also, if people really don’t want kids, I’d be fine subsidizing voluntary sterilizations. It would be like what the Social Darwinists of the early 20th century did, but consensual this time.
If they don't know they are pregnant 3 months in the state should force them to carry the baby to term. The state should then execute the mother because shes FUCKING FAT.
 
Today's hereditary illness is tomorrow's evolutionary survival tool. As dumb as Star Trek 5(the search for whales) is it has a salient point. You have no idea what the future will hold and what species, or in this case collection of genes, will be needed in the future.
You have confused Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home with Star Trek V: The Kirk Gary Stu Hour.

I demand the surrender of your nerd credstick this instant.

:nerd:
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Getting tard comed
Last night was honestly hilarious, reading shit takes here and on twitter, giving autistic ratings, watching some discords closely as all the theythems and fags raged. One instagram friend posted like 20 stories all about roe and how much they hate the US lol. It made my day.

On the other hand, looks like this Will be the next topic to plague social media for weeks, hopefully there will be some action in the form of peaceful protests, yawn.
 
Many states allow abortions up to 12 weeks. Most women are probably aware they are pregnant by then. You are allowed to get it for any reason at all within certain windows, it just gets restricted after a certain amount of time. Also, if people really don’t want kids, I’d be fine subsidizing voluntary sterilizations. It would be like what the Social Darwinists of the early 20th century did, but consensual this time.
You are moving the goalpost and it is supremely retarded.
This isn't about "not having kids" this is about having kids with who you want, when you want them, when you are ready and can care and provide for them.

Also this juridiction will stop abortions even in the first weeks of pregnancy.
 
Today's hereditary illness is tomorrow's evolutionary survival tool. As dumb as Star Trek 5(the search for whales) is it has a salient point. You have no idea what the future will hold and what species, or in this case collection of genes, will be needed in the future.
Tell you what. When alien's with Mongolian features and retard strength arrive smelling faintly of soured ham and begin kicking our asses I'll concede your point, but I know people with some tangled family lines who suffer from crazy debilitating shit and there's no way in hell having the women in your family being extremely anemic and prone to seizures could ever come in handy evolutionarily.

Even my far extended family has some weird issue where the shakes begin at 30 and by 50 you are completely paralyzed. My granddads side weren't carriers, but it's still harrowing talking to a dude whose life literally has a timer on it. No one needs that shit.
 
Many states allow abortions up to 12 weeks. Most women are probably aware they are pregnant by then. You are allowed to get it for any reason at all within certain windows, it just gets restricted after a certain amount of time. Also, if people really don’t want kids, I’d be fine subsidizing voluntary sterilizations. It would be like what the Social Darwinists of the early 20th century did, but consensual this time.
Planned Parenthood does more than just abortions. We've reached a point in society of safe, legal abortions and neither side can agree without it being a political point.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back