Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
It never fails to amaze me how most of these "protesters" and "activists" have absolutely no idea what the object of their ire is even about. The willful ignorance they embrace and display is getting to be as bad as some of the worst examples of that mindset from the previous century.

As off the map as the hippies were, even they at least had a basic grasp of history and had formed at least something resembling a rational purpose.

The leftist fanatics today are the sort of people who are told that they should hate holes in the ground, and then proceed to spend the rest of what should be the best years of their lives throwing bricks into the Grand Canyon convinced that one day they might just fill it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kane Lives, spiritofamermaid, madethistocomment and 8 others
Exigent Circumcisions said:
:story:

Did your parents not teach you about death? The fuck is this shit?
Click to expand...
Nigga people kick the bucket on average between 50 and 100. Talking to a 40 year old who knows for 100% certainty he's dead in a decade is a lot different than some geezer whose 80.

Also, I hope everyone in this thread knows that all this ruling was that states get to decide, and that any "TEXAS WILL HUNT ME DOWN IF I GET AN ABORTION IN CALIFORNIA" sperging is pure doomerism. If you want to bitch about the trigger law that's fine, but consider that governments tend to knee-jerk when you take away their ability to control their own state.

Seriously I never expected to see kiwi farms of all places have a non zero number of people crying. Frankly I'm amazed anyone here is concerned to begin with. Pretty sure you have to have a wizard card to even post here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kane Lives, spiritofamermaid, DicksOutForKiwigglers and 4 others
xXxFat_CuntXxX said:
My favorite consequence of feminist screeching is when women are ready to settle down (generally in their mid 30's) but are too old and either have complications leading to miscarriages and the lucky babys they do manage to have are mouth drooling autists, no not just a stupid socially inept idiot but a legit mouth drooler that has to be put in the sped rooms due to low IQ from being born from a old hag and most likely being raised on formula instead of titty milk because mom was too old and was having complications making titty milk.
Click to expand...

Seriously,if guys had any right to choose would they go for the over 30-year-old woman to have kids with or someone in their early-mid 20s to have kids with?
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Gaear Grimsrud and SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
6MillionCoofs said:
Might I suggest moving to a blue state? You might be happier?
Click to expand...
That's not gonna happen. Too expensive to move to the enlightened utopia. Too expensive to get out once you experience slipping on human feces for the first time. all those that can afford to flee did already and to make up for that the states/cities raised taxes to compensate lost revenue for the horde of fat desk jocky's required just to mobilize one poop patrol member.
 
RurkerHivemind said:
Seriously,if guys had any right to choose would they go for the over 30-year-old woman to have kids with or someone in their early-mid 20s to have kids with?
Click to expand...
I've met a good number of men who are more interested in settling down around that time too but biologically its not as good of an idea. It's a serious cultural thing that is causing issues due to the body not being designed for this sort've thing.
 
The Ancestor said:
Sorry if it’s been explained, but what’s stopping Democrat governors from just trying as fast as possible to legalize it in their state? I’d think they would have been doing this when it was leaked but it seems like they’re not doing anything
Click to expand...
Voters. Abortion isn't as popular as they would have you believe.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, DicksOutForKiwigglers, Gaear Grimsrud and 2 others
6MillionCoofs said:
Depends how old the guy was honestly.
Click to expand...
There's a real argument to be had there. How many "old enough to bleed old enough to breed" types would end up either killing themselves or getting murdered because they "married" the most dangerous creature known to man (16 year old with bpd).

You'd think these 30 year old women would be hyping the fact they have their fucking life in order. I'm sure plenty of young men with 0 life experience would be easily woo-ed by the feminine arts of having a steady job and paying taxes. Not that these women would want the kind of slob that attracts. How many 40 year old men cultivating interests like flyfishing and alcoholism want a 22 year old starlet that isn't a pure trophy wife. I.E she's fucking planning a trip to hike in Patagonia and expects him to keep pace.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Driedsoap and DavidFerrie
RurkerHivemind said:
Seriously,if guys had any right to choose would they go for the over 30-year-old woman to have kids with or someone in their early-mid 20s to have kids with?
Click to expand...
clearly the latter but the social norm is to only procreate when both parties have well established careers and that doesn't really happen when the the bitch and cuck are in their 30's-40's. having kid's before that is achieved is considered a mistake and what bitter, kidless, and zealous fat feminist's use to justify why we need to cleanse the world of "mistakes".


Dear lord if some 30-40 year old man with established stable career goes after a 20 something year old woman because the enforcers of the social norm (women and their beta cuck orbiters) will go on a campaign to cancel the "pedophile" for preying on a young and defenseless wamen
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, DicksOutForKiwigglers, SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and 1 other person
Frofo Baggis said:
All these amateur revolutionaries hoping for an IRA type revolution seem to forget about the rival loyalist gangs who'd commit revenge attacks against innocent Catholics. It was tit for tat killings for decades so expect revenge attacks against commies, gays and feminists if they ever tried getting violent. And then the IRA would kill informers (touts) too, even ones who squealed under torture. 99% of these fags would squeel like little piggies. They don't have the balls to do what the IRA did. Could you imagine a fat danger haired feminist trying to do a hunger strike like the Irish Hunger Strikes? They wouldn't last 2 days. All talk, no real backbone.
Click to expand...
They'll squeal before the electricitic volts course throughout their body and the actual IRA type would then still proceed to zap their balls because you don't get the quick mercy of a bullet in the head you're made to suffer first when you're condemned of the crime of being a tout/traitor.

People don't get if you want IRA/UDA you're asking for a group of diehards that will unleash the full extent of human violence and brutality fueled by a bitterness that was growing from decades of mistreatment.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, madethistocomment, Caustic Gelatin and 9 others
Matt Damon said:
Was it corrupt when they were dominated by leftists for a century? Was it corrupt when Roe v Wade was ruled on initially?

Or just now that you don't like what they're saying?
Click to expand...
Yes. The Supreme Court has always been a function of the same monied interests that rule America. It's just the monied interests were formerly less hateful toward the people, especially in the middle of the century when the Great Depression combined with WWII forced them to compromise with us instead of running us plebs over like in the early 20th century or as they do now. The Supreme Court, especially nowadays, will always do favors for the global elite, just like they've done now where they're distracting everyone by needlessly kicking a hornet's nest.
 
  • Autistic
  • Optimistic
  • DRINK!
Reactions: St.Davis, Autistic Joe, Norbert the Tiger and 6 others
The Ancestor said:
Sorry if it’s been explained, but what’s stopping Democrat governors from just trying as fast as possible to legalize it in their state? I’d think they would have been doing this when it was leaked but it seems like they’re not doing anything
Click to expand...
It is not as popular within even their own elected establishment as they make people think. Even less amongst the actual voters.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, DicksOutForKiwigglers, FierceBrosnan and 1 other person
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back