Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Screen Shot 2022-06-25 at 7.37.01 PM.png
She looks like what she sounds like too.
 
But overall you're missing the greater point entirely, somehow, that the people I'm talking about in that post are escaping from their political choices for what they saw no consequence and all upsides. Now that there's a significant downside that demands lifestyle changes that they find detestable at best, they're stuck between living under laws they find disgusting or having to go back to their hellholes. If you honestly still think it's about availability rather than convenience I don't think I can explain it in a way you'll understand at all.
So they're just parasites. But let's not pretend it's a question without merit, these people have been squawking specifically about availability and claiming it's now something impossible to get. That makes me feel compelled to point out the various ways it is available.
 
Hmmm? The Military refusing to recognise the laws of the states and nation. And disregarding the High Court. This is what actual insurrection looks like.
I don't even understand the logistics of it.

The state puts an arrest warrant out someone for breaking state law and the Pentagon will do, what, post an armed guard and fire upon any police who try to execute the warrant?

That would be hilarious, but I'm skeptical.
 
What the fuck does that even mean? They're not even remotely in a position to declare a law unconstitutional nor in a position to "not recognize" a law for any other reason.
Law enforcement decides what laws they'll enforce, I believe it's called "selective enforcement."
 
Law enforcement decides what laws they'll enforce, I believe it's called "selective enforcement."
Wikipedia said:
The United States Department of Defense (DoD,[5] USDOD or DOD) is an executive branch department of the federal government charged with coordinating and supervising all agencies and functions of the government directly related to national security and the United States Armed Forces.

They're not "law enforcement", not in any way shape or form that relates to state law, or anything else regarding the RvW decision. Unless I'm missing something critical here, I fail to see how this matters unless they're going to send in the fucking military in order to keep abortion clinics open against state law, because of a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States explicitly recognizing that it's in the hands of the states in absence of federal regulation.
 
They're not "law enforcement", not in any way shape or form that relates to state law, or anything else regarding the RvW decision. Unless I'm missing something critical here, I fail to see how this matters unless they're going to send in the fucking military in order to keep abortion clinics open against state law, because of a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States explicitly recognizing that it's in the hands of the states in absence of federal regulation.
I agree with this post. Joe Rogan is right, the Supreme Court should not be dictating what the states can or cannot do when it comes to abortion. The Roe v Wade decision was a mistake and has led to years of division and turmoil. It's time for the Court to correct its error and allow the states to make their own decisions on this issue.
 
They're not "law enforcement", not in any way shape or form that relates to state law, or anything else regarding the RvW decision. Unless I'm missing something critical here, I fail to see how this matters unless they're going to send in the fucking military in order to keep abortion clinics open against state law, because of a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States explicitly recognizing that it's in the hands of the states in absence of federal regulation.
They are going to use Military bases and Military Doctors as Abortion Clinics.
 
The majority are manchildren with delusional power fantasies who would kill me if they knew me, why would I want the majority to get what they want?
If that's indeed true, then you must be a pedophile or rapist. The majority would probably kill pedos or rapists, given the opportunity.

Or are some screeching Twitter NPCs your definition of the majority? Maybe you spend too much time online. Maybe you should touch whatever safe to touch vegetation there might be in your area.

We should all do that from time to time. Better that than touching kids. But don't tell that to priests!
 
Rapists shouldn't.

But when it comes to consensual pregnancy, I do think the men should have a say, but they ultimately can't have the final word as that would rob the woman of her autonomy.

In my ideal world if a woman wants an abortion the decision is ultimately hers but on the flip side if a man wanted an abortion but the woman was keeping it, he should be allowed to disassociate without being financially penalized; no child support or anything.

Women still get off easy because even if a man doesn't want to have a kid but she keeps it, it'll still fuck with the man that his kid's out in the world whereas if a woman aborts that's the end of it. But it's more fair than robbing women of choice or forcing men who didn't want children to pay for one.
Ok but if she kills my kid that bitch is dead. I am not a violent man but I draw the line at family. Granted this would never happen because I don’t sleep around and I’d legit propose if I got a girl pregnant but if it came to it, I think men should have the right to kill the woman and/or abortionist who killed their child. Like yeah it’s vigilante justice but it’s still justice and I don’t think I can really blame a guy who does that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back