Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it’s a combination of the hormonal changes from the pill, hookup culture, and being able to order dick easier than ordering a pizza that’s done it. There’s actually studies that find people are less happy with more choices. It’s a “grass is greener” kind of thing. Women are notoriously neurotic.
I don't have any scientific evidence for this but I think hookup culture effects men and women differently because women have unrealistically high standards for male attractiveness. Like if a guy has sex with an 8 one time and ends up marrying a 6, he'll still be happy because he's getting to have sex and a realtionship. But if a women has sex with an 8 one time, she'll never be satisfied with anything less. Unfortunately for them, GigaChad.png isn't going to respect and want to marry a woman who gives it up immediately.
 
The ruling affected the half dozen or so states that that were "may-issue", in which the applicant had to convince the issuing agency that they had a good reason to concealed carry, and the IA could reject the applicant for any reason or no reason.
Hmm, I wonder if this isn't another in a long line of laws that were originally established to undermine black people like minimum wage laws or black codes.
 
Men: close your legs whores! if you don't want to get pregnant then don't have sex. if you have a botched coathanger abortion then too bad, you're a baby murderer and you deserve to die

Also men: sex is VITAL for my survival. my self esteem rests on whether or not I've nutted in a girl recently. I am entitled to sex with beautiful women and if they don't fuck me by the third date, they're prudes and a waste of my time. I will stalk and harass women until I get what's owed to me... but it's also totally ok to ghost/discard women when they do have sex with me. if she gets pregnant from my sperm, that's her fuckin problem not mine, what is fatherhood?
...

I genuinely want to know how men would react to a sex strike. Would they applaud women for no longer being reckless baby murderers? Or will they rape and kill us for no longer being their willing whores?
What the FUCK are you on about?
 
To those who think men can't be raped, do you believe rape by deception is a thing? If a woman tells a man she's on birth control in order to sleep with him, and he consents to sex because he believes that's true, was he raped? And if he was raped, can he abort the child under the rape/incest/health exception?
I know you posit this question to people who can't be raped, which excludes me, but wanted to respond.

Our legal system could probably not function if we were to make queries on whether sexual relations were predicated on a lie. Men lie to women to seduce them, and women lie to men. I am not sure whether i would call it rape, but there are some situations where deception should factor into the legal consequences of sexual relations:

- statutory rape scenarios where a woman who is say 15 or 16 lies and says she is 16, 17, 18 or whatever age is at or above the age of consent law, provided that it is reasonable for someone to buy into the lie. If she is 11 and tells the guy she is 28, no sorry. But there is a lot of jailbait that looks 18, 19, whatever. IIRC, a good faith belief that someone is of age is not a defense in many jurisdictions and I think that's really messesd up.

- scenarios where a partner has a serious, usually untreatable venereal disease and lies about it with knowledge that person has it.

- Finally, trannies who lie to a guy. Although I would probably characterize this as "constructive rape," as it usually does not get to the point sexual penetration against one's will. There are so many instances where some tranny persents as a woman, starts making out, then the guy reaches down and figures it all out, or even worse the tranny convinces the guy to let him or it (not her, and I am not the one misgendering here) suck him off or do some other sexual activity that he would not otherwise consent to. A lot of the tranny violent actually happens from those sorts of scenarios. According to Matt Christiansen, that's why the violence against trannies in Peurto Rico is so high.
Apparently, a lot of guys are having trouble with this on dating apps and one dating app now does not let one filter out "trans women" from real women (I think its tinder). So glad I am now in a long term relationship/marriage/engagement (I won't tell).

As for whether the courts should get into whether a woman told him she is on the pill, the courts would probaby have to get involved. I don't know what the solution is, but women should not just be able to abort a baby regardless of what the father says. Nor should should women be allowed to indenture a man (espeically a young man starting out) into 18 years of indentured servitude. Adoption is probably a good solution to this problem--I am told there is a shortage of supply and high demand..... That and maybe laying off the hyper promsicutiy, wallowng in porn sort of society we find ourselves in.
 
Hmm, I wonder if this isn't another in a long line of laws that were originally established to undermine black people like minimum wage laws or black codes.
There are cucked places that require firearm insurance. So the low income guy who lives in a place where the police take an hour to show up can't legally own a gun to defend himself. Gun control never affects the rich guys, since they can afford the fees or hire armed security. It's the poors who need guns the most yet can't get on legally.
 
Okay, okay, hear me. That sounds pretty based.
Yeah when you tell women that in old patriarchal England a sexual assault conviction was a mandatory death sentence, they just freak out and deny it. Turns out "toxically masculine" high-T men actually protect women, and it's soy male feminists who make them uncomfortable. Who would have thought?
 
This is the problem: outside of rape, both parties have plenty of choices before pregnancy. I have no sympathy for either of them. Don't stick your dick in anyone you wouldn't give up 50% of your wealth to in a divorce.
That's admittedly a tall order unless we revise society such that people get married at 18-19 or early twenties... which would really solve a lot of societal problems...
 
I don't have any scientific evidence for this but I think hookup culture effects men and women differently because women have unrealistically high standards for male attractiveness. Like if a guy has sex with an 8 one time and ends up marrying a 6, he'll still be happy because he's getting to have sex and a realtionship. But if a women has sex with an 8 one time, she'll never be satisfied with anything less. Unfortunately for them, GigaChad.png isn't going to respect and want to marry a woman who gives it up immediately.
Women don't think about attractiveness and sex the way men do. Charisma and wealth often trump physical looks.
 
Women don't think about attractiveness and sex the way men do. Charisma and wealth often trump physical looks.
For relationships maybe. For sex, it's looks especially with modern Tinder culture. That's how a lot of men end up getting cucked. A woman will marry a rich man to provide for her, and then get pregnant by a hot dude. Conservative estimates are 1/8 men are raising children that aren't theirs unknowingly. Women have unrealistically high standards for what constitutes average looking. They rate only 20% of men as being of average attractiveness or better. Whereas men are dead on rating 50% of women as being of average attractiveness or better.
 
A lot of people are going to see this as a schizopost, but this is a site full of schizos, so I hope you'll humor me.
I really think that this overturning was a genuine act of God, and I think the lack of mega-severe rioting is a testament to that.
There is probably an alternate timeline where this didn’t happen, but perhaps the abortionoids solidified their fate when attacking churches, because it invited the literally presence of God. Perhaps the vaccine really was the mark of the beast. Perhaps this decision’s announcement was one of the seven seals. I’m mostly joking, but there does seem to be something spiritually substantial about all of this :)
It is substantial. Culturally it represents the line in the sand. For so long people were tolerant and quiet because they just wanted to grill. Once we got to open indoctrination in schools parents started to flip a switch.

I witnessed some woke in-laws get verbally exterminated by deplorables on Facebook over roe v. Wade. The tide is turning and it's going to be brutal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back