- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
the weekend of pride? isn't it pride month? I don't know anymore whats going on with all these special daysFirst thing I saw, this is going to be good.
View attachment 3420771
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the weekend of pride? isn't it pride month? I don't know anymore whats going on with all these special daysFirst thing I saw, this is going to be good.
View attachment 3420771
Wtf happened to society
Well some niggos and anarchists cross over into the feminists crowd yeah? I was expecting there to at least be a little more of an uproar.you expected women to do something?
give it a minute, the organizations that rent vans and fill them with weapons for spontaneous protests expected this decision next weekThe lack of " Fiery but mostly peaceful protest is disappointing"
Lets be real, most abortions are by exactly the people you want them to be by.Nobody gives a damn about men and they never have. Women somehow kick tranny commies out of their sports and magically become the only gender that can give birth again during pride month of all months - the most holy month of the year. What do men get? We get blamed for the bioleninists that are attacking women who they label as "terfs". If we could get some real equality and finally get men the same rights that women enjoy then they wouldn't have to worry about having their lives fucked over with child support payments, both abortions and child support payments make it far too easy for women to be sluts.
You would have to have severe retardation to believe that at this point, retardation likely caused by the spikes produced by the mrna sequences in your body. If you can still catch, spread, and get sick from a virus that you are vaccinated against then it's not a vaccine. Half of the farms knew this in 2020, I hope by 2030 you might wake up. My body my choice to get vaccinated.
Why do bioleninists even want abortions in the first place? In a less disgusting time you might assume a pro abortionist would be thinking of rape, the health of the mother, and disabled babies, but none of those are brought up in current times. So it comes down to white genocide, the joy of killing babies, or a cult-like devotion to unprotected sex. All of those are quite fucked up, but I wouldn't expect anything less from a group that firebombs pregnancy centers.
this is just sad. Do people not realize that most jobs that matter count them as expendable and most likely have a list of immigrants ready to replace them the moment they stop making them money.
The problem is that they don't just HRT their own kids, they are HRTing every kid they can in every school that they infest, and every school in every western country is pushing HRT. The entire abortion industry will collapse in the future because nobody will have any organs to have babies with.Lets be real, most abortions are by exactly the people you want them to be by.
It's not white genocide for some stupid feminist slut to kill their crotch goblins, it's self imposed eugenics.
They are killing off their own side. LET THEM.
Until this country has the balls to execute abortionists for murder, there really is no better punishment to them then letting them have what they want.
Another hint for you that above poster pointed out: to the ones that celebrate it- it's about the power to fuck over men that they celebrate it for.I'm more leaning on the pro-abortion side mostly for the elimination of horrific genetic disorders, but these demonic fucks are making me more pro-life. My main gripe with this crowd is how they treat abortion as pleasurable as eating a delicious cake. You would think they would understand the mental ramifications of undergoing such a procedure, but they dont have a damn empathetic bone in their body. So you know what? Fuck them and fuck their feelings, they deserve to be upset.
Take the Amish pill. Stay out of the system and avoid cities, this is ultimately a self correcting issue.The problem is that they don't just HRT their own kids, they are HRTing every kid they can in every school that they infest, and every school in every western country is pushing HRT. The entire abortion industry will collapse in the future because nobody will have any organs to have babies with.
If you want to go this far then the government should be able to force women to bear children to keep the population numbers stable, just like it can force men to go to war (draft/conscription). A stable population is necessary to keep a state going after all, just like how it sometimes need men to go out and die to secure the existence of it's institutes.So do the people making pro-abortion arguments of "it's just a clump of cells" also advocate that a man should have the right to demand an abortion from someone he has gotten pregnant? I mean, the effects of an unwanted child on him are life-changing: 18+ years of child support payments under threat of imprisonment; social consequences, inheritance effects possibly taking from his other children... It's unarguably massive. And if a woman can choose to avoid major consequences in her life because it's a "safe and normal medical procedure" that only affects a "clump of cells" then should that not be extended to him also?
I assume all these feminist campaigners determined that abortion is a right because of the impact of being forced to keep it on the mother; similarly believe that a man should have the right to demand an abortion takes place because of the impact on him? Right?
Force them to put their children up for adoption. There are tons of nice white couples who wants kids but can't have them.Proof "The Man" can't force them into anything. Again, let them kill their kids, any woman that would kill their child for any reason other than they would die due to birth is a monster and doesn't deserve the joys of motherhood.
And if you're someone who uses the argument of "just a clump of cells", then that makes sense. I'm just trying to enforce consistent logic here for the fun of it. I'm not advocating it. And maybe trying out an argument ready for when someone uses the "clump of cells" mantra at me.If you want to go this far then the government should be able to force women to bear children to keep the population numbers stable, just like it can force men to go to war (draft/conscription). A stable population is necessary to keep a state going after all, just like how it sometimes need men to go out and die to secure the existence of it's institutes.
Equal rights mean equal duties. If women want the vote, then they should also be required to give up their bodies to support the state if necessary. Honestly, spaghetti man said it in a succint manner:
View attachment 3428298
I'm not disagreeing, I'm just saying that the inconsistency of law goes far further than just abortion/clump of cells.And if you're someone who uses the argument of "just a clump of cells", then I agree.
I'm just trying to enforce consistent logic here for the fun of it. I'm not advocating it.
The man can in theory just run off, though. He isn't physically connected to the baby. One has to prove he's the baby's dad. Not to mention that he stuck his dick inside her and spilled the load as well.It's the woman's choice because it affects her body? But it affects the man's life massively too. If it's just a clump of cells why doesn't he get the chance to demand an abortion because it affects him? You're surely not suggesting the impact on the man isn't life changing. Imagine being signed up for a twenty year mortgage on a house you can't even live in, because you crashed there one night.
If the fetus isn't a human being, has no right to life, then why should the man's choice matter less than the woman's when it affects him just as much?
Now, if you believe the fetus has a right to life as pro-life people do, then the guy doesn't get a say. Just the same as the woman doesn't get a say - because it's the fetus that matters. But if you believe it is "just a clump of cells" then the guy has as much say as the woman. And surely feminists who argue a position based on that should be consistent and say the man can demand an abortion for the same reasons as the woman. Because of the consequences on him if the procedure isn't carried out.
Are you for fucking real dude? Those have been the nonstop talking points making the rounds since Roe Vs Wade was overturned. Just look at this thread.Why do bioleninists even want abortions in the first place? In a less disgusting time you might assume a pro abortionist would be thinking of rape, the health of the mother, and disabled babies, but none of those are brought up in current times.
While I would ordinarily agree with you, who's to say the mother might not simply abandon the child as much as the father?The man can in theory just run off, though. He isn't physically connected to the baby. One has to prove he's the baby's dad. Not to mention that he stuck his dick inside her and spilled the load as well.
It’s a sexual kink. The thrill of killing and the horror of a egg beater going BRRRRRR inside of them is orgasmic. Not sexual but the cotton swab in the ear or being smug when defeating a retarded Eurocuck in a argument and watching them chimp out type of orgasmicReading this shit I just fucking realized women claim to get raped/actually get raped and don't fucking go get a morning after pill.
I get it ladies, plan a was to not be raped, but shouldn't you start looking at plan b?
On the contrary - he has the entire infrastructure of the state aligned against him and "running off" involves forgoing mainstream participation in the workforce and other aspects of life. Your introduction of the qualifier "physically" into the above is pointless - he is connected and against his will (in this scenario). Nor does someone have to prove he is the baby's father (which is possible anyway so another pointless qualifier on your part). People have been forced to pay child support even when it's proven he's not the father. And in France it's actually illegal for a man to order a paternity testing kit without the mother's consent!The man can in theory just run off, though. He isn't physically connected to the baby. One has to prove he's the baby's dad. Not to mention that he stuck his dick inside her and spilled the load as well.
Like I said at the other thread, who the fuck will actually protest for abortions? Blue cities already legalized it. The types of Women that care about the issue can only cope and seeth since god forbid they work for a goal. And Men are forbidden from the topic so why should they care unless they are white knighting for sex?Knock on wood but is anyone else suprised but an overall lack of protests even by the usual suspects? I was imagining something on the scale of at least BLM.