Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
I really dont care about what this means for Americans, but I am curious about Clarence's statement.

Yes. Okay, there is ground now to abolish same sex rights, same sex marriage and contraception. However....Isn't the right to marry interacially founded upon the same series of opinions as the above?

Though I suppose Christians have moved on from screaming about the curse of cain and are more awed by how devout some migrant communities are so that's fine now.

I'm not professing to be a legal expert by any means, so correct me if I'm wrong. It just seems a very strange direction for him to take personally his own background considered.
Maybe he's tired of his bitch wife. Probably wants to get a divorce but doesn't want to lose half of his shit. Instead he's going to try to make his marriage void and try to get away with it. Already feel sorry for him.
 
"But that means more people of color will die to back alley abortions!"




Ok
To be fair Malt liquor and club fights is as back alley abortion you can get.

For actual medical back alley stuff the bitch and her cuck would go to some animal hospital or it's equivalent for their procedure


or perform a DIY on the kitchen island

 
All this theater, and abortion rates have been going down every year. It's just a ladder for religious extremists to get power.

View attachment 3428932

What a lot of people forgot, or were too young to understand, is that that Lifers don't give a flying f*ck about black pregnancy rates. No plans for the ghettos, no maternity leave, just sneaky political manuvering. It's a movement based on self-preservation.
It seems to me that a lot of African American women don't believe in abortion, regardless. I can't speak for them but I've worked with many, live in a mostly minority neighborhood. In fact, many of them are aware of the racist policies of Margaret Sanger, etc. I live in a deep blue state, so they're not all evangelicals. They don't generally trust left wingers, either, as many of them live in areas that have been Blue long before they were born.

Women who frequently have abortions are seen as degenerates-- it's assumed they are probably heavy drug users, and that they don't want to deal with deformed/disabled children or a drug addicted/imprisoned ex.

They don't seem to stigmatize young women getting pregnant the way we white people do-- for example, a 20 year old white woman will be treated like trash for not getting her college degree/career if she gets pregnant, but a black woman will more often have full support of her extended family. Like I said, I work with a lot of minority people, and quite a few will happily work 7 days in a row to help support extended relatives, including cousins and cousins' children. White people do not do this unless they have no choice, and even then they are resentful.

If a woman happens to have some knowledge of the welfare system, particularly through relatives who have gone through it, it's obvious that more children= more benefits. Many of the lower class rural white moms with 6+ kids are also fully aware of this, but they don't disclose the fact they're on welfare. If half your family is on welfare, there is no stigma in getting benefits for yourself. Same phenomenon can be seen in white families where everyone is on "disability" for something bizarre.

Many women who are hispanic, regardless of where their ancestors came from, are similarly against abortion for the most part. There's a lot of overlap between the two communities due to the various Caribbean cultures. They see it as a positive thing to have children when one is young vs. older.

There are a lot of protesters who are minority, but I don't think they speak for their ethnic groups.
 
In modern times, it opens up the door for allowing transhumanism, which advocates human experimentation, eugenics, genocide, euthanasia. Note how many of the biggest transgender treatment centers were once primarily abortion clinics. There's a connection there.

Interestingly, I remember when pro-life people used to support abortion in cases of rape, incest and potential harm to the mother. Those were considered "reasonable" opinions to have at that time, even among hard core Catholics I knew personally.

The fact that there are pedophiles priests doesn't negate the fact there are pedophiles everywhere.

I've experienced pregnancy, one that wasn't well timed or planned, so I don't take it lightly. However, I see transhumanism as much greater threat to humanity at large than unplanned pregnancies. Besides, I'm sure there will be "technological advances" which make abortion a thing of the past in a few years. Women who shriek about Roe being overturned don't realize that transhumanism, which is funding leftist politics, wants to eradicate women from the earth, as they see us as "useless eaters", they see us as "environmental hazards", and despise the fact we can breed without technological intervention. Transhumanism wants to control reproduction, and women are the barriers to that goal for them.
What the fuck is that transhumanism mumbo jumbo you just mentioned? What does that have to do with abortions? Did you hear about that on Fox News or Alex Jones Show? Controlling reproduction? Sorry, but nobody is forcing you to have or not kids. You can have as many kids as you want, if you want.
 
What a lot of people forgot, or were too young to understand, is that that Lifers don't give a flying f*ck about black pregnancy rates. No plans for the ghettos, no maternity leave, just sneaky political manuvering. It's a movement based on self-preservation.
Right wingers in government helped push for more business opportunities for black businesses (with things like increasing number of contracts with black businesses), increasing lending to black businesses to help get them going, infrastructure development in places considered ghettoes, greater investment in underachieving neighborhoods (ghettoes), more policing to try and make ghettoes safer, and so on and so on.

Almost all of society bends over backwards to help blacks through every step of their lives. The idea they're being ignored by anyone is insane.

download (5).png
 
What about the impacts on the fetus of getting born when it’s unwanted? If the mom, not wanting her fetus, drinks a ton of alcohol hoping that will cause miscarriage but it just causes major FAS? Where it’s born into a fucked up life, gets traumatized in CPS and joins a gang when he turns 18? I can think of more common situations where it would be advantageous to the fetus to get aborted rather than have a mother who didn’t want to have him.
Child abuse is already illegal. Purposefully drinking alcohol to try and cause a miscarriage is already illegal. The government can not stop someone from hating a child, but they can criminalize abuse and killing it in the womb.
It’s not getting handed back to constituents, like on a ballot referendum, it’s going back to the statehouses; many of which are packed with even more crazy evangelist republicans. Overturning Roe v. Wade is a checkmate in an Inter party chess match that’s been going on since the 80’s. It’s going to take a while to vote them out and Democrats are shit at the long march; they get energized about some issue for a season or so and then go back to their own hobbyhorse issue.
People get what they voted for. If a statehouse is filled with evangelists that's the will of the state constituents. One is free to move to a liberal state if one dislikes the local government.
 
Child abuse is already illegal. Purposefully drinking alcohol to try and cause a miscarriage is already illegal. The government can not stop someone from hating a child, but they can criminalize abuse and killing it in the womb.

People get what they voted for. If a statehouse is filled with evangelists that's the will of the state constituents. One is free to move to a liberal state if one dislikes the local government.
Is this a life you think is good? All else being equal I think asking a mom to raise a kid she doesn’t want (and can’t provide for) is asking for that kid to become a net drain on society. Either thru welfare or CPS the states going to end up being that kids daddy and it will be yo ur tax dollars paying for him.
 
What a lot of people forgot, or were too young to understand, is that that Lifers don't give a flying f*ck about black pregnancy rates. No plans for the ghettos, no maternity leave, just sneaky political manuvering. It's a movement based on self-preservation.
Not to be that guy, and I'm speaking from experience:

Black culture has been largely synonymous WITH ghetto culture based on enabling such behavior for years. Nobody is certainly doing anything about Black-on-Black crime. Actually, Blue states had worsen qualify of life for urban living since BLM.
 
What the fuck is that transhumanism mumbo jumbo you just mentioned? What does that have to do with abortions? Did you hear about that on Fox News or Alex Jones Show? Controlling reproduction? Sorry, but nobody is forcing you to have or not kids. You can have as many kids as you want, if you want.
Trannyhumanism is a idea from the 20th century to using technology as a way to improve the human condition. In reality it's psycho commies pumping themselves full of drugs and trying to shove computers into their brain and doing their best to enforce it onto others screeching about that's how that's how we'll all reach true equity and Curt Cobain just like what the Buddhists talk about .

Borderlands-Bandit-Badass-Psycho.jpg
 
Is this a life you think is good? All else being equal I think asking a mom to raise a kid she doesn’t want is asking for that kid to become a net drain on society.
The mom accepted the consequence of carrying a child when she had unprotected sex. She again accepted the responsibility of raising the child when she didn't give it up after birth.
Having to live life with a mother that doesn't want you is almost always preferable to death. Only depressed losers who read shit written by pedos like Sartre think otherwise.
If we were to begin removing net drains on society I've got a whole list to do down, and at least those people have proven themselves to be losers. What you're proposing is killing someone for possibly becoming a net drain.
 
Is this a life you think is good? All else being equal I think asking a mom to raise a kid she doesn’t want (and can’t provide for) is asking for that kid to become a net drain on society. Either thru welfare or CPS the states going to end up being that kids daddy and it will be yo ur tax dollars paying for him.
the solution to that problem is to eliminate welfare, not eliminate the child.
 
I have an idea! Since you Americans like democracy so much why don't you have a referendum about the abortion part as well as many other questions? IIRC Switzerland is one country where any major law changes require a referendum with a majority vote. Or is that communism, socialism or whatever the current scare word Trumptards came use?
Have you read Dobbs, or even Roe/ Casey which Dobbs overturns?

That is in effect what Dobbs allows for, at the state level. Under Roe, abortion was made legal l by five plus unelected judges. Now, constiuents in each state can decide for themselves. A correct and obvious result for the reasons the Dobbs opinion sets forth at length.
 
Is this a life you think is good? All else being equal I think asking a mom to raise a kid she doesn’t want (and can’t provide for) is asking for that kid to become a net drain on society. Either thru welfare or CPS the states going to end up being that kids daddy and it will be yo ur tax dollars paying for him.
Oh no. Ghenkis Khan killed every man then impregnated us and now we live in despair better kill our kids and unborn children
 
What about the impacts on the fetus of getting born when it’s unwanted? If the mom, not wanting her fetus, drinks a ton of alcohol hoping that will cause miscarriage but it just causes major FAS? Where it’s born into a fucked up life, gets traumatized in CPS and joins a gang when he turns 18? I can think of more common situations where it would be advantageous to the fetus to get aborted rather than have a mother who didn’t want to have him.

These kin aren’t stepping up for the kids who are already out there. Also the idea of having a baby cause your MIL wants you to have one is fucked, cause even if they adopt and do 100% of the care for the baby, they can’t carry it for the person in question. It’s a major imposition.

The only reason you think these two issues are related us because you’re an MGTOW or something

It’s not getting handed back to constituents, like on a ballot referendum, it’s going back to the statehouses; many of which are packed with even more crazy evangelist republicans. Overturning Roe v. Wade is a checkmate in an Inter party chess match that’s been going on since the 80’s. It’s going to take a while to vote them out and Democrats are shit at the long march; they get energized about some issue for a season or so and then go back to their own hobbyhorse issue.

Everything you are against has one thing in common. Care to hazard a guess?
 
Are you from the Middle Ages or are you just Catholic? Because you sound like you would be happy if contraception was banned also.
I don't know how you got that idea. I've always used protection while having sex because it makes sex safe. I'll stop using protection when I'm married with someone I trust to raise a child with.
It's incredibly easy, and people seems like absolute morons for thinking abortion is the preferable alternative.
 
The mom accepted the consequence of carrying a child when she had unprotected sex. She again accepted the responsibility of raising the child when she didn't give it up after birth.
Having to live life with a mother that doesn't want you is almost always preferable to death. Only depressed losers who read shit written by pedos like Sartre think otherwise.
If we were to begin removing net drains on society I've got a whole list to do down, and at least those people have proven themselves to be losers. What you're proposing is killing someone for possibly becoming a net drain.
Like troons!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back