Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
I hate welfare, but I see it as a product of the enviroment and the fact is as long people are having pregnancies they don't want or need with no option of an out before hand then I think it would be cruel to rip whatever social security net until an option to solve the issue has been done.
"I don't give a shit about life, so it is ok to murder unwanted children. But it would be wrong to take away welfare from the poor women."

You are literally the worst libertarian and an-cap I have ever seen.
 
Not when it’s inside of another.
Agree to disagree.
Seems a dumb argument from the man's side. You just want to murder it as much as she would. This is why I constantly hammer that abortion is not just about 'women's rights'. All that aside, there will be men like you that will kick us in the stomach or kill us to kill their own children because muh inconvenience.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: incelita
All these people spewing nonsense about bodily autonomy. Morons, an example of the government taking your bodily autonomy would look much more extreme.

Imagine the state mandating your child take hormones castrating them because of a quack doctor. Imagine someone putting a chip in your neck and when you do something they don't like it explodes.

THAT'S taking away bodily autonomy. You can still have unprotected sex, you can still take birth control and contraceptives, you still have access to coat hangers. The only difference now is before you could turn off your brain and have no responsibility for your actions. Now you can't be a brainlet and let your animal instincts control you. If you can't control yourself from having sex or fall prey to your emotional impulses, in my opinion you never had bodily autonomy in the first place.

In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes.
Judges 21:25 ESV
 
Forgive me if this has already been said in this thread but Count Dankula changed his twitter handle to "Justice Dankula" and there are a shit ton of people who seriously believe that he's actually part of the Supreme Court. There was seriously a woman who quote tweeted him saying he was everything wrong with America...even though he's fucking scottish lmao.

Only on Twitter.
Yea his salt mining is on point.
Screenshot_20220626-213127_Brave.jpg
 
The idea that the desire to have sex is somehow not the same as the desire to procreate is absolute insanity that has been created by modern society and the detachment from reality that's been created with... all of this.

Your body and all the chemicals in it want you to reproduce. That is what sex drive is. Any thoughts to the contrary is a product of programming.
 
The idea that the desire to have sex is somehow not the same as the desire to procreate is absolute insanity that has been created by modern society and the detachment from reality that's been created with... all of this.
That seems rather overstated. Contraceptives (of varying degrees of efficacy) have been used for thousands of years.

People may have been more prepared for the consequences of sex, but that doesn't mean they didn't attempt to avoid pregnancy and decouple sex and child-bearing just as modern people do.
 
Seems a dumb argument from the man's side. You just want to murder it as much as she would. This is why I constantly hammer that abortion is not just about 'women's rights'. All that aside, there will be men like you that will kick us in the stomach or kill us to kill their own children because muh inconvenience.
We’re not murderers. That always seems to be the pro life go-to line. I once had to order my 4 year old Husky Pitt put down due to Pyometra. I’m still not right even after all these years. Does that mean I should have PITA protesters calling me a murderer?

I don’t want to sperg but I encourage you to listen to people’s stories. There isn’t this “Hey I’m 8 months pregnant, I’m not feeling it anymore, let’s abort.”

Sorry to repeat this same phrase but you’re being very presumptuous about a lot on the topic. I get your pro life stance. I really do. I just don’t see the need to go around forcing my beliefs and personal life choices on everyone else.
 
We’re not murderers. That always seems to be the pro life go-to line. I once had to order my 4 year old Husky Pitt put down due to Pyometra. I’m still not right even after all these years. Does that mean I should have PITA protesters calling me a murderer?
It's a well documented fact that people care more about small animals with big eyes. Not for any logical reason, but because of how they look. It's called the "bambi effect." and is why lots of people who don't support hunting are ok with fishing.
 
Just playing devil's advocate here, but what do you all think about forcing a young child to give birth? Ex. A 13 year old is pregnant through rape. A really extreme case I know, but it happens. What would be your solution to that problem? I have yet to see an in-depth answer on this. Not that there isn't one.
Abortion exceptions exsist for such cases. If they had to though, that’s the kind of thing adoption is for.

It's sucks but that's the best we go right now.
 
Last edited:
We’re not murderers. That always seems to be the pro life go-to line. I once had to order my 4 year old Husky Pitt put down due to Pyometra. I’m still not right even after all these years. Does that mean I should have PITA protesters calling me a murderer?

I don’t want to sperg but I encourage you to listen to people’s stories. There isn’t this “Hey I’m 8 months pregnant, I’m not feeling it anymore, let’s abort.”

Sorry to repeat this same phrase but you’re being very presumptuous about a lot on the topic. I get your pro life stance. I really do. I just don’t see the need to go around forcing my beliefs and personal life choices on everyone else.
You are comparing a dog with a fatal condition with a human of your own creation with none.
 
Bro…. 13? Come on.
The general consensus among pro-lifers is exceptions can be made for those who carrying the pregnancy to completion poses a serious health risk.
If the 13 year old can safely deliver the child, her age is irrelevant because she's physically matured to that point. If she isn't sufficiently developed to safely give birth then the abortion is an unfortunate, but perfectly excusable, act of self preservation.
 
The general consensus among pro-lifers is exceptions can be made for those who carrying the pregnancy to completion poses a serious health risk.
If the 13 year old can safely deliver the child, her age is irrelevant because she's physically matured to that point. If she isn't sufficiently developed to safely give birth then the abortion is an unfortunate, but perfectly excusable, act of self preservation.
But it’s still a life. It’s not the baby’s fault the rape victim was only 13 and hardly a grown woman.
 
uhh...did something happen to adoption while I wasn't looking? yes you have to carry and deliver the baby but you're not saddled with it for the next couple decades
it's so strange to me that it hasn't been mentioned in any capacity, like I'm in some bizarro world
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back