Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well we have rights.

NY is a bit much too liberal for its own good sometimes. That’s just the crowd. Nevertheless the state doesn’t have the right to ignore constitutional amendments that were collectively passed by all states.

Now going back to abortion, the hypocrisy lies with allowing certain states to ban something that was already federally ruled as a constitutional right.

The republicans are really having their cake and eating it too.
I don't even know what this is about. What Constitutional amendments are you referring to? The 5th? 14th? Dobbs explicates why a right to abortion cannot be gleamed from this or other part of the Constitution.
allowing certain states to ban something that was already federally ruled as a constitutional right.

Right, Dobbs—quite correctly—overturned Roe and Casey which read a non existent Constitutional right to abortion in a way not unlike pulling a rabbit out of a hat. "Penumbras and emanations" and all that preposterous nonsense. Did you read Dobbs? Are you capable of even understanding the courts majority opinion?
 
I keep telling y'all, if you don't want a baby so bad, wear a fucking condom.
I know I'm :late: by now but I'd like to add:
  • If condoms fail too much to trust, they fail too much to be taught as a reliable alternative to abstinence only sex education.
  • I'm all for legal adults of both sexes having increased access to voluntary permanent sterilization.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SneedEyeMitch
You show a fundamental lack of understanding for contemporary civics. The US as a federal nation was meant to have far less impact on individual member states. The recent decision on Roe v. Wade is a uncharacteristic change in the normally federalization of the US where states have over time lost power to the federal government.
The EU is experiencing the same thing. It was meant to be a economic union, but has been given its own courts, its own parliament, and now have political parties voted for across the EU. Member states in the EU have been penalized for not following decisions made by the EU parliament and EU courts. The EU is experiencing a federalization of power.
Interestingly, with Ukraine and Moldova possibly joining the union, and brexit, it's looking like the social conservatives might become the largest political block, and you might end up with the EU enforcing anti abortion and anti homosexuality laws across the EU within this decade.
You show a fundamental lack of understanding of the EU political space and the culture there.
EU conservatives are mostly like Democrats are. They're liberal conservatives. Anti abortion and anti gay laws aren't gonna pass in all of EU. The richest countries will especially be against it. They might pass in Poland and Hungary for now but they won't last long.
 
Have you read Dobbs, or even Roe/ Casey which Dobbs overturns?

That is in effect what Dobbs allows for, at the state level. Under Roe, abortion was made legal l by five plus unelected judges. Now, constiuents in each state can decide for themselves. A correct and obvious result for the reasons the Dobbs opinion sets forth at length.

Killing babies in the womb is morally indefensible. That's why all you people have to do life boat libertarian scenarios or ghetto baby mama examples.
 
It's incredibly easy, and people seems like absolute morons for thinking abortion is the preferable alternative.
Nobody thinks abortion is “preferable” to safe sex, and no woman wants to get an abortion rather than use the pill. But these things have failure rates and eventually someone fucks it up, and at that point “just use contraception” is useless advice. Think about another gross medical procedure: Nobody with colon cancer wants a colostomy or thinks having a colostomy is more convenient than pooping normally, but they’re at a point where colonoscopy and healthy lifestyle isn’t going to fix their colon.

Now consider abortion; if you don’t get it you’re gonna give birth, which is more risky than the abortion, harder on the body, more likely to rip your ass in two. I’m not trying to defend abortion as desirable, but for some women it’s necessary unless they want to experience birth, which is far more dangerous to their body. (And, not that you care, not an experience any woman should have to go through if she doesn’t want to! That shit hurts!)
 
Last edited:
I really dont care about what this means for Americans, but I am curious about Clarence's statement.

Yes. Okay, there is ground now to abolish same sex rights, same sex marriage and contraception. However....Isn't the right to marry interacially founded upon the same series of opinions as the above?

Though I suppose Christians have moved on from screaming about the curse of cain and are more awed by how devout some migrant communities are so that's fine now.

I'm not professing to be a legal expert by any means, so correct me if I'm wrong. It just seems a very strange direction for him to take personally his own background considered.

Anyone who didn't think Barrett and freinds were not going to gun straight for this was dumb.

Still, I'd be surprised if it has that much impact. Abortion providers now have the right to set premium prices in states which allow it.
Those other decisions Thomas mentions don't have anything to do with "removing rights" they're about horrible case law and precedent that was set by nonsensical SC decisions.

There's nothing stopping Congress from passing laws tomorrow that federally enshrine contraception and same sex marriage into law. Why haven't they already?
 
  1. The negro birth rate is below replacement level
  2. Roughly half abortions are already performed illegally, and niggers will definitely take that route
Every single negress I see has a gaggle of little pickaninnies following her like coal black ducklings. Some start popping out babies as soon as 13; I went to a pretty "urbanized" school and easily 25% of my classmates didn't graduate high school because they were having babies.

So I ask you: if 5 chilluns per adult woman isn't replacement rates, just how many spooks are getting killed in drive-bys?
 
no woman wants to get an abortion rather than use the pill.
That's where you're wrong kiddo
Now consider abortion; if you don’t get it you’re gonna give birth, which is more risky than the abortion, harder on the body, more likely to rip your ass in two. I’m not trying to defend abortion as desirable, but for some women it’s necessary unless they want to experience birth, which is far more dangerous to their body.
 
I’ve said it before, I don’t really care for American Politics beyond it being far more entertaining to watch than Canadian politics, but credit to the Supreme Court. I haven’t seen this many unhinged white women since Trump won - who’d’ve thought all it’d take for the mask to completely slip and Nigger’s dropped on people’s personal, public Twitter account was for a generation of women to be told No for the first time.

Someone let me know if this is what finally sets off the Boogaloo, I might need to resupply on popcorn..,
 
Killing babies in the womb is morally indefensible. That's why all you people have to do life boat libertarian scenarios or ghetto baby mama examples.
I think you responded to the wrong post.

I take a more conflictedview on abortion, but I was summarizing the legal ruling of Dobbs and the legal reasoning of it and cases it overtirns in response to someone who shows no understanding of the case or the actual issues at hand


I am also far from libertarian.
 
Killing babies in the womb is morally indefensible. That's why all you people have to do life boat libertarian scenarios or ghetto baby mama examples.
Some people think posting on Kiwi Farms is morally indefensible. Muslims in kekistan think pop music is morally indefensible. One of the nice things about the USA is that you don’t have to live your life conforming to the imam’s ideas of what’s ok. Edit to add: and the killing babies rhetoric is an overstatement, because she don’t have a baby yet, she has a pregnancy that may or may not come to term. Also this “killing babies! Omg! The babies!” rhetoric inspires domestic violence against pregnant women by pro life schizocows.

Unwanted babies in affluent white families can suffer abuse also, but frankly those women will be able to go out of state for abortion. Mostly the women who are going to feel the effect of this are going to be the ghetto mamas.
 
Last edited:
  1. The negro birth rate is below replacement level
  2. Roughly half abortions are already performed illegally, and niggers will definitely take that route
The welfare state (of mind) would be more profitable to HAVE the child than to abort it. I'm not speaking for everybody; it's a long running trend that's been going on for years. See: child support.
 
All this theater, and abortion rates have been going down every year. It's just a ladder for religious extremists to get power.

View attachment 3428932

What a lot of people forgot, or were too young to understand, is that that Lifers don't give a flying f*ck about black pregnancy rates. No plans for the ghettos, no maternity leave, just sneaky political manuvering. It's a movement based on self-preservation.
Bro didn’t you know? Being pro life isn’t actually about protecting life.

It’s about controlling people’s sexual behavior.
 
Some people think posting on Kiwi Farms is morally indefensible. One of the nice things about the USA is that you don’t have to live your life conforming to the imam’s ideas of what’s ok.

Unwanted babies in affluent white families can suffer abuse also, but frankly those women will be able to go out of state for abortion. Mostly the women who are going to feel the effect of this are going to be the ghetto mamas.
Then we need to get the ghetto papas more involved
 
I know I'm :late: by now but I'd like to add:
  • If condoms fail too much to trust, they fail too much to be taught as a reliable alternative to abstinence only sex education.
  • I'm all for legal adults of both sexes having increased access to voluntary permanent sterilization.
The left then: "Lol, abstinence is backwards, just wear condoms, the chances of it failing is one in a million!"
The left now: "OMG WE NEED ABORTION, CONDOMS HAVE LIKE A 50% CHANCE OF BREAKING! AND I READ SOME MEN EVEN INTENTIONALLY PUNCTURE HOLES IN IT! PLEASE I NEED TO BE ABLE TO KILL BABIES OR THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS SAFE SEX!"
 
Extra retard action from the poster of the video screaming their Karen head off.


72D52F8D-AE8A-45BC-856E-C36BCB439B46.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • mpLfeImTVqCbRNz4.mp4?tag=12 2.mp4
    8.4 MB
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back