The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
NYC is very liberal and makes up the vast majority of the state. Do you really think a state which voted a Biden win 60-37% should have a red state legislature?
Considering how NYC policies negatively affected the shipping/agriculture regions, I would rather have a red legislative body that can fix those core issues that has been plaguing the state for decades than keep on relying on the moral grandstanding of the city.
 
So not sure if I just want to pick a fight or what I'm getting at here, other than saying I am beginning to doubt the "pure" intentions of early feminists in seeking legalization of abortions. It started from seeing the following picture on /pol/:
1656283037542.png
Horrifying right? I can see how we wouldn't want this madness to continue. I can't even imagine the horrific circumstances one was trying to escape. It's easy to see why this became a rallying image. As a bit of a history sperg I wanted to know more and out of laziness I started at Wikipedia, I'll use them as they are "objective" or any bias would be placing Gerri Santoro in a more-positive light. What was this woman trying to escape?
In 1963, her husband's domestic abuse prompted Santoro to leave, and she and her daughters returned to her childhood home.
Oh no, rape baby incoming or poverty I bet. Although great work leaving!
She took a job at Mansfield State Training School, where she met another employee, Clyde Dixon. The two began an extramarital affair and Santoro became pregnant.
I mean, personally, I would have had higher priorities than sex in such circumstances but whatever. I guess it must have been tested and proven to be a tardbaby or something...
When Sam Santoro announced he was coming from California to visit his daughters, Gerri Santoro feared for her life.[3] On June 8, 1964, twenty-eight weeks into her pregnancy, she and Dixon checked into the Norwich Motel in Norwich, Connecticut, under aliases.[3] They intended to perform a self-induced abortion, using surgical instruments and information from a textbook which Dixon had obtained from Milton Ray Morgan, a teacher at the Mansfield school. Dixon fled the motel after Santoro began to bleed. She died, and her body was found the following morning by a maid.[2]

Dixon and Morgan were arrested three days later. Dixon was charged with manslaughter, and Morgan was charged with conspiring to commit an illegal abortion.[4] Dixon was sentenced to a year and day in prison.
Lol nope. She hadn't actually left/divorced her abusive husband. She didn't want to deal with the affair or getting knocked up. So killing a baby was just another effort to kick the can down the road.

Without even getting into the myriad systemic differences between then and now, this is pretty damming. Obviously this isn't something to just mention or ask people about. So case details held out publicly are rare and ostensibly carefully selected. If this is the case they chose to share, what other hare-brained reasoning is being used as emotional lynch-pins behind the scenes?
 
So not sure if I just want to pick a fight or what I'm getting at here, other than saying I am beginning to doubt the "pure" intentions of early feminists in seeking legalization of abortions. It started from seeing the following picture on /pol/:
Horrifying right? I can see how we wouldn't want this madness to continue. I can't even imagine the horrific circumstances one was trying to escape. It's easy to see why this became a rallying image. As a bit of a history sperg I wanted to know more and out of laziness I started at Wikipedia, I'll use them as they are "objective" or any bias would be placing Gerri Santoro in a more-positive light. What was this woman trying to escape?

Oh no, rape baby incoming or poverty I bet. Although great work leaving!

I mean, personally, I would have had higher priorities than sex in such circumstances but whatever. I guess it must have been tested and proven to be a tardbaby or something...

Lol nope. She hadn't actually left/divorced her abusive husband. She didn't want to deal with the affair or getting knocked up. So killing a baby was just another effort to kick the can down the road.

Without even getting into the myriad systemic differences between then and now, this is pretty damming. Obviously this isn't something to just mention or ask people about. So case details held out publicly are rare and ostensibly carefully selected. If this is the case they chose to share, what other hare-brained reasoning is being used as emotional lynch-pins behind the scenes?
You actually read that /pol/ garbage? What the fuck is wrong with you?

"I know who I want to expose myself to and fraternize with: a bunch of perpetually angry internet dwelling schizoids whose opinions literally nobody in real life respects". Maybe next you could tell us about what you read on Tumblr.

Plus I don't fucking believe any of you. If the retards on pol suddenly had pussy dangled in front of them they wouldn't care if the resulting kid got aborted, and if the pro-choice hos were suddenly exposed to some handsome charismatic well-off dude who they liked who was pro-life they'd abandon their bleeding heart shit in a second.

You're all fucking retards and should stop pretending to actually believe in things just for the sake of it.
 
You actually read that /pol/ garbage? What the fuck is wrong with you?

"I know who I want to expose myself to and fraternize with: a bunch of perpetually angry internet dwelling schizoids whose opinions literally nobody in real life respects". Maybe next you could tell us about what you read on Tumblr.

Plus I don't fucking believe any of you. If the retards on pol suddenly had pussy dangled in front of them they wouldn't care if the resulting kid got aborted, and if the pro-choice hos were suddenly exposed to some handsome charismatic well-off dude who they liked who was pro-life they'd abandon their bleeding heart shit in a second.

You're all fucking retards and should stop pretending to actually believe in things just for the sake of it.
Oh no! I scroll shitposts on my phone! FYI I actually didn't read anything beyond the filename as it was her name that lead me to wikipedia. You understand that the average person could use your quote to characterize the farms? I can point you to plenty of publications that essentially have. "Plus I don't fucking believe any of you." I'm sorry did you just refer to me, a single person, as a collective when you called out /pol/ for being schizoid two sentences before? You're hysterical.
 
If the retards on pol suddenly had pussy dangled in front of them they wouldn't care if the resulting kid got aborted, and if the pro-choice hos were suddenly exposed to some handsome charismatic well-off dude who they liked who was pro-life they'd abandon their bleeding heart shit in a second.
Hell yeah dude youre the only smart person in the room
 
Serious question: why WOULD we want leftists to keep reproducing instead of aborting the baby?

White liberal woman already have a TFR of like 1.6, and that was last studied in like 2000s. Birth rates have fallen significantly since that period in America plus the left has shifted further to the left on cultural stuff. So with the advance of the pride agenda, a quarter of little girls IDing as other gendered, climate change making it a moral imperative never to have kids, etc- its probably closer to 1 now.

The biggest associations with low fertility is high level of female education followed by low religiosity and left wing political views. I've never seen great evidence that AWFLs/college educated white women are prolific users of abortion compared to minorities or low income whites with problematic impulse control.

Anyway with these birth rates, without or with abortion, white liberals shouldnt trouble us for much longer. It's a evolutionary dead end.
 
Anyway with these birth rates, without or with abortion, white liberals shouldnt trouble us for much longer. It's a evolutionary dead end.
Except for the fact that the demographic most likely to have an abortion in the United States are black women, who are responsible for the majority of abortions in several red states (62% in Alabama, and 65% in Georgia, to name just two). Which party do black people overwhelmingly vote for again?
 
I remember all the times I heard that men should have no say in abortion. I would just like to cheer for all you ladies that finally roe v. wade is overturned, a piece of legislation that was written and judged by a group of about 8 men. The legacy of these men's voices has now been overturned.
 
Except for the fact that the demographic most likely to have an abortion in the United States are black women, who are responsible for the majority of abortions in several red states (62% in Alabama, and 65% in Georgia, to name just two). Which party do black people overwhelmingly vote for again?

Your statistics are correct. But as Bob Dylan famously sang: "The Times They Are a Changin".

More and more American minorities are voting Republican. Even Trump, who the media spent years saying was racist against Hispanics, captured a large portion of their vote.

Southern Hispanics and blacks tend to be religious too.

And after the past few days of liberals and leftists calling Thomas a nigger, it's just going to strengthen their resolve.

The Democrat's hold on the minority vote is slipping, and they know it.
 
Back