Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
6MillionCoofs said:
Gates et al are already working on it. Have been for years. There's articles about it.
Click to expand...
This is why I don't think the left bothered trying to push abortion rights into some national law when it was possible. Tech/biomed already had "other plans", and they're the ones funding the Democratic campaign coffers.

Allowing abortion to continue doesn't really enrich tech and biomedical companies. Clinics like Planned Parenthood have been focusing on transgenderism for a while, and that's a big money maker for them. They're admonishing women to use "trans inclusive" language non stop. Trans issues are their main focus, not women's healthcare. Transgender clinics themselves are the money makers, not abortion services.

Allowing the repeal of Roe to happen helps rally hysterical women onto the left, because using abortion rights has always been a tool they've used to scare women into voting for them... while simultaneously giving the Democrats' tech overlords an even more profitable future to look forward to.

Not only does it open a door for tech to push transhumanistic "birth control technology", It also helps increase the number of young women transitioning into men. If you look into transhumanism, they want to collect data on women's bodies, replicate women's bodies using that data, and replace them with artificial wombs/ robots... the end game is to eradicate women and create a profitable business in their absence... kind of ironic.

For biomed and tech, repealing Roe V Wade is a huge WIN for them. It increases profits AND ensures "their party" remains in power!
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard and Trianon
Diabolical diabetic said:
Praise be to biden, wouldn't have happend without him :heart-full:

View attachment 3420838
Click to expand...

basedtrump.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Lunacy
Reactions: A1 Steak Sauce, StevieLasVegas, Nypical Haterade Comment and 14 others
xXxFat_CuntXxX said:
Women aren’t autistic enough to track their menstrual cycles like that ( not using the app method) unless it’s for malicious reasons
Click to expand...
The women I've known to have used them primarily started them because their cycles were "irregular", and over time these apps would help "predict" when their next cycle would occur. The first time I heard of them was around 2014, so I shudder to think how much data these apps have collected about these women for all those years.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Troonologist PhD and Matt Damon
xXxFat_CuntXxX said:
Women aren’t autistic enough to track their menstrual cycles like that ( not using the app method) unless it’s for malicious reasons
Click to expand...
I've had a few girlfriends who used those apps. They let me see it. It was mostly for when they switched birth controls, or they wanted to know if they were late.

No idea why it needed a fucking web connection to function, but that's a different issue.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Cryptozoology, Troonologist PhD, Doseferatu and 1 other person
6MillionCoofs said:
Women keep threatening fhat.

It always turns out men can last way longer than they can.
Click to expand...
I mean historically this isn't surprising. Women were regarded as the lustful ones in medieval societies. Reputable men had to protect themselves from their temptress ways. Men were about mastering their animal nature and women embraced it. It's why the man was the head and the woman the heart.

allen_nberry84 said:
This is actually the best birth control method, it's just mocked because it's associated with Catholics. Doesn't require an app though
Click to expand...
It reminds me of sex ed in high school where they basically told you all it took was one sperm touching you and you were as good as pregnant. No wonder people were afraid of swimming pools and toilet seats in single stall restrooms.

It's actually surprisingly difficult. There's only about a week a month where it's possible the sperm will live long enough to fertilize an egg, and then there's still like a 50/50 chance the egg will successfully implant, because they are shockingly bad at that. I mean good enough for the survival of our species, but still surprising.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Your Girlfriend's Dad, Troonologist PhD and LurkNoMore
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back