Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
When has McConnell said they are going to attempt an abortion ban?
The only piece of republican legislation for abortion is a 15 week ban, which is a later ban than pretty much the entirety of the EU which protesting faggots hold up as the shining beacon of civilization for whatever reason.

Pretty sure it's the same bill Repubs put forward months ago when the leak occurred and Dems threw the olive branch back in their face because they wanted full 3rd term abortions and to basically look like evil jackasses.

I think they should amend the bill to 2000 weeks so we can abort all the people at this protests who don't understand what the SC does and just used this as an excuse to chimp out like their BLM fathers of yore.

“And if this were the final decision, that was the point that it should be resolved one way or another in the legislative process. So yeah, it’s possible,” he concluded.
I expect to see all you "states rights" people upset about this legislation if it gets proposed. I doubt I will see that, but maybe I will be surprised
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SCSI
What does it say about the left in the US that one dead black career criminal is worth rioting over, but the perceived seizure of women’s rights is barely a blip. If people actually thought that we were headed for the handmaiden’s tale (and that’s a horrible thing) you would think there would be a bit more resistance.
They're hoping we're headed for the handmaids tale. Like someone pointed out earlier it's fetish porn for a lot of these women.
 
I don't understand your fixation with the state's rights angle. Supporting federal legislation via the supremacy clause does not exclude one from also supporting state's rights.
Except a lot of folks in this site are saying they love it because of "MAH STATES RIGHTS". Usually those people don't actually care about states rights but instead want to use "states rights" to discriminate against people they don't like

And you guys keep dodging the question instead of simply answering it.
 
Except a lot of folks in this site are saying they love it because of "MAH STATES RIGHTS". Usually those people don't actually care about states rights but instead want to use "states rights" to discriminate against people they don't like

And you guys keep dodging the question instead of simply answering it.
What is the question? I may have missed it.
 


I expect to see all you "states rights" people upset about this legislation if it gets proposed. I doubt I will see that, but maybe I will be surprised

That's from May, and he is saying that something could happen because the SC ruling would make abortions not a matter of constitutional protection.
I'm not this imaginary states rights person you invented to argue against, I think there should be a national Abortion legislation making a base level legal. If states want to kill children at 8.5 months that's on them, but nationally a modest 12-15 week abortion bill is fine with me.
 
Would the states rights people, celebrating this, be as outraged about a national abortion ban proposal (i.e. from McConnell) as you are happy about this?
No, I wouldn't be. I am against abortion and I would be totally fine if a national ban was imposed through our legislative process. That is why we have the legislative process.

That said, I understand the impracticality of it and am fine with the state's rights level compromise.
 
That's from May, and he is saying that something could happen because the SC ruling would make abortions not a matter of constitutional protection.
I'm not this imaginary states rights person you invented to argue against, I think there should be a national Abortion legislation making a base level legal. If states want to kill children at 8.5 months that's on them, but nationally a modest 12-15 week abortion bill is fine with me.
Honestly, I'd be fine with a 16 week ban as a "baseline" (so anything before that is legal in every state) and if any state wants to allow it later than that, it's legal. I think that's a fair compromise.

No, I wouldn't be. I am against abortion and I would be totally fine if a national ban was imposed through our legislative process. That is why we have the legislative process.

That said, I understand the impracticality of it and am fine with the state's rights level compromise.
So then you aren't really "states rights" but just want to use that to ban abortion as much as possible. At least honest, man.
 
they can literally just pass pro abortion state legislation. it’s that easy. but they are playing 4D chess. like, why even vow to fight the federal government. just make abortion legal in your state holy shit.
Because they failed civics class in high school.
Some kind of Balkanization with or without a massive civil conflict.

Logic being that if a conflict broke out today Washington would make the same decision they made in 1861. That the union must be preserved at all costs. Whatever form that ends up taking.
Nukes. The form is nukes.
Let them keep talking. They're unknowingly digging their own grave deeper and deeper the more they do so.
 
If people actually thought that we were headed for the handmaiden’s tale (and that’s a horrible thing) you would think there would be a bit more resistance.
The reality is most people don't think there's an overthrow of the Islamic republic by organized leftists incoming.

Am I high, or was it some other piece of dystopian fiction that was actually about the Iranian Revolution that got retconned into being about $subject_of_the_day
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I'd be fine with a 16 week ban as a "baseline" (so anything before that is legal in every state) and if any state wants to allow it later than that, it's legal. I think that's a fair compromise.


So then you aren't really "states rights" but just want to use that to ban abortion as much as possible. At least honest, man.
I said I was against abortion period from the get-go. I have never deviated from that.
 
I said I was against abortion period from the get-go. I have never deviated from that.
Right, but you aren't really who that question was addressed to. You are more anti-abortion than you are using "states rights" to hide behind. I've noticed a lot of Republicans use "states rights" to try and discriminate against those they don't like

Because they failed civics class in high school.
It's not that easy, though. Some blue states are gerrymandered out the ass by Republicans, so Republicans pretty much control the states despite them being blue. I'd have thought someone with such knowledge in civics would understand that
 
The reality is most people don't think there's an overthrow of the Islamic republic by organized leftists incoming.

Am I high, or was it some other piece of dystopian fiction that was actually about the Iranian Revolution that got retconned into being about $subject_of_the_day[/ispoiler[
No, you were right:
Atwood was also inspired by the Islamic revolution in Iran in 1978–79 that saw a theocracy established that drastically reduced the rights of women and imposed a strict dress code on Iranian women, very much like that of Gilead.
 
Right, but you aren't really who that question was addressed to. You are more anti-abortion than you are using "states rights" to hide behind. I've noticed a lot of Republicans use "states rights" to try and discriminate against those they don't like


It's not that easy, though. Some blue states are gerrymandered out the ass by Republicans, so Republicans pretty much control the states despite them being blue. I'd have thought someone with such knowledge in civics would understand that
What am I hiding behind exactly? I want it banned. If I have to live with it being banned only in certain states that share my sentiment in this regard I am willing to do that.
 
What does it say about the left in the US that one dead black career criminal is worth rioting over, but the perceived seizure of women’s rights is barely a blip. If people actually thought that we were headed for the handmaiden’s tale (and that’s a horrible thing) you would think there would be a bit more resistance.
The circumstances that led to the Grand Crackup at the Race Riots 2020 for Fentanyl Floyd will likely never be repeated during our lifetimes. People haven’t had months of sitting at home being afraid the Chyna Virus with nothing to do but get fat and watch teevee. The government isn’t paying people to “stay home, stay safe” any more and the rent moratoriums are over so all of the shithead cracker bums that had nothing but time to cause chaos are back to being wage slaves again. Throw in that all of the funny money from live-streaming is gone as well thanks to inflation and there’s zero incentive for another “100 Days of Rage” on the Woke Stream. Also the flights aren’t free now if they aren’t cancelled so it’s not as cheap and easy as it was in May-August 2020 to just go some place on a whim.

If not for the Chyna Virus Fentanly Floyd would have crashed his ragged out 2003 Mercedes into a bus shelter on Chicago Avenue and died being the nobody shitstain be always was, we likely wouldn’t have had the Rittenhouse Roundup, and a lot of people lives wouldn’t have been completely ruined over foolishness.

Seeing Clarence “Balls Out” Thomas make these assholes absolutely miserable really is making me happy again, which I didn’t think was possible. All I want out of life now is to see these shitbags that cheered on and participated in the Summer of Love 2020 miserable for the rest of their worthless lives.
 
What am I hiding behind exactly? I want it banned. If I have to live with it being banned only in certain states that share my sentiment in this regard I am willing to do that.
You aren't who I was referring to, like I said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back