Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
New Programing folks
JUST IN - Pelosi, the speaker of the US House, labels the Supreme Court an "extremist" body that punishes the American people.
View attachment 3433378
You would think they'd start antagonizing the SCOTUS a bit less after the recent few decisions that have been made. Maybe tone down the rhetoric against them a bit about packing the court, etc. I don't see this tactic ending well for future decisions.
 
And calling people they don't like pedos is the definition of a QAnoner.


When you hate on teachers and call them pedos, you just reaffirm the stereotype you guys have of hating education
Catholic priests are far less likely to molest my nieces or nephews then public school teachers and officials.

I know you feel real smart and smug thinking that Conservatives are dumb dumbs because no doubt your mind is incapable of seeing past your own npc programming. But public education has problems in fact so many problems that aren't dealt with because we have lionized our teachers when in reality most of them are incompetent, dumb, and have perverse incentives that allow them to sexually abuse others and not lose their job because of teacher tenure.
You want schooling you don't want education. Education means you can read the classics, understand Latin, physics, and geometry. last I checked the school system is more concerned with saying little Timmy here is why gender non binary is important.

This isn't 1998 it's not conservative dumb dumbs upset that you're hearing a scientific version of the birds and the bees and being told abstinence is best but condoms are second.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220626_094432_668.jpg
    IMG_20220626_094432_668.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 76
You would think they'd start antagonizing the SCOTUS a bit less after the recent few decisions that have been made. Maybe tone down the rhetoric against them a bit about packing the court, etc. I don't see this tactic ending well for future decisions.
Nah, keep going. I desperately want to see Clarence Thomas put the words "And fuck you, Nancy" into an official SCOTUS opinion.
 
And calling people they don't like pedos is the definition of a QAnoner.


When you hate on teachers and call them pedos, you just reaffirm the stereotype you guys have of hating education
I'll stop calling them pedos once they stop insisting on talking to children about how sodomy and ingesting horse piss pills is stunning and brave.
 
If players can do Tebows or kneel, I don't see the issue with them praying. I don't care one way or the other, just be consistent.
It's mainly because the militant atheists (usually left leaning) go full retard because they can't possibly comprehend that freedom of religion means freedom to observe said religion.
God I hate being an athiest at times since I get lumped into the whole left leaning crowd.
 
our teachers when in reality most of them are incompetent, dumb,
The good ones are the old ones who actually had a job or career around what they teach or an autistic obsession like the history teachers.

The crappy ones are the went to work for a school right after getting a teaching degree and the ones with the most Pedo's are sports medicine cunts.
 
If players can do Tebows or kneel, I don't see the issue with them praying. I don't care one way or the other, just be consistent.
That particular case was a coach in Bremerton WA who would go pray after games were done, and a lot of his players would join him. Nothing was made an official team activity, no players were pressured into it. It was mostly the local school district freaking out that their students were religious, and demonstrating as such.
 
The good ones are the old ones who actually had a job or career around what they teach or an autistic obsession like the history teachers.

The crappy ones are the went to work for a school right after getting a teaching degree.
There were some good teachers out there I had. The only time I ever had a history class move me was watching the atomic bomb effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Honestly it was good though it makes me think about war.

But sadly most of the teachers are coach's who care less about teaching and literally only took on teaching because coaching pays more if they also teach. Then on the other hand you have the elementary schools flush with these overly progressive teachers who want to indoctrinate the kids in their beliefs.

I had a liberal teacher like that who was proto BLM but surprisingly based on issues because they were educated on the law. unironically she thought internally suspended kids.
 
It's mainly because the militant atheists (usually left leaning) go full retard because they can't possibly comprehend that freedom of religion means freedom to observe said religion.
God I hate being an athiest at times since I get lumped into the whole left leaning crowd.
It's either Republican Jesus or the cult of the communist state. Pick a side, Nazi.
 
Up to 80% of your political beliefs tend to be heritable however approximately 1 in 5 will have like a complete opposite political idea. So liberal parents tend to have liberal kids and conservative parents tend to breed conservative kids. Even with degenerates in animal control like Diezel Raccoon he's a diaper fag but politically his politics roughly follows the boomer parents.
(degeneracy ie cringe fetishs can be separate from political ideology)
Interestingly this spikes to over 90% when the mother speaks to her children regularly about politics, though the father doing the same has no effect (this may have been a sample size problem).

Additionally once they're locked in as adolescents it's very unlikely they will ever change their minds.
 
What constitutes as ‘death’ none of us remember ourselves as babies do we? a fetus is even less sentient that a born child and doesn’t have proper brain functions developed or any memories of its existence. How can it die if it never truly lived? Your semantics reek of self righteous conservatism and religious fundamentalism.

I happen to have memories from when I was around a year old. I know this because I remember walking feeling awesome, among other things.
 
Interestingly this spikes to over 90% when the mother speaks to her children regularly about politics, though the father doing the same has no effect (this may have been a sample size problem).

Additionally once they're locked in as adolescents it's very unlikely they will ever change their minds.
More or less hence there is a reason why progressives really want to control the education systems and indoctrinate the kids. I know most of the people think. (They're just teaching normal sex Ed and ABCs bigot, They're not ruining education dummy stop being stupid. CRT isn't a real issue and also it's teaching the truth.)
At some point they're so fearful of reverting back on progress that they will unironically accelerate their own destruction.

Politically males tend to change around their 20s and thirties they tend to politically settle and form change. But females often tend to be set before 25.
 
On the doctor's case, Xiuliu Ruan v. US, has anyone read that decision?
There seems to be an argument over whether or not under the law the state much prove that the defendant was acting in an objective good faith manner versus knowing and intentionally breaking the law (The latter is harder to prove imo). Granted, they all reached the same conclusion to vacate and remand because the district court instructions may have erred.
Resisting the “knowingly or intentionally” standard, the Government instead offers a substitute mens rea standard. The Government says that rather than simply apply the statute’s “knowingly or intentionally” language to the authorization clause, we should read the statute as implicitly containing an “objectively reasonable good-faith effort” or “objective honest-effort standard.” Brief for United States 16–17; cf. post, at 13 (concurrence arguing that doctors can defend against a §841 prosecution by proving that they have “act[ed] in subjective good faith in prescribing drugs”). That is to say, once a defendant meets his or her burden of production, the Government can convict “by proving beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendant] did not even make an objectively reasonable attempt to ascertain and act within the bounds of professional medicine.” Brief for United States 16.
But acting “as a physician” does not invariably mean acting as a good physician, as an objective understanding of the “in the course of professional practice” standard would suggest. A doctor who makes negligent or even reckless mistakes in prescribing drugs is still “acting as a doctor”— he or she is simply acting as a bad doctor.
 
Politically males tend to change around their 20s and thirties they tend to politically settle and form change.
I was quite liberal compared to my parents in my late teens and twenties and have come back rightward since, but I don't know how much of that is me changing compared to the political landscape changing underneath me.

When I was 20, nobody was even thinking about troons giving sex hormones to children or putting them in drag shows.
 
There were some good teachers out there I had. The only time I ever had a history class move me was watching the atomic bomb effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Honestly it was good though it makes me think about war.

But sadly most of the teachers are coach's who care less about teaching and literally only took on teaching because coaching pays more if they also teach. Then on the other hand you have the elementary schools flush with these overly progressive teachers who want to indoctrinate the kids in their beliefs.

I had a liberal teacher like that who was proto BLM but surprisingly based on issues because they were educated on the law. unironically she thought internally suspended kids.
I had a BLT sandwich teacher in middle school that was a little to open about LGBTness. Everyone just laughed. I assume kid's today are doing the same thing because Man chopping off cock=woman is absurd enough to be funny, especially to the young mind, though there will be the ones absorbing the fear mongering and other schizo junk because at home the parents are pushing the same thing onto them getting political with the kid.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Prune Tracy
I'm just gonna throw my two cents in here, for whatever it's worth. Not gonna get in a big thread argument, but I'm looking at replies from both sides and I might as well comment myself. I'm gonna sperg out a bit and go on a tangent, but fuck it. Here goes.

I am 100% pro-life, and I'm just going to come out and say that yes, I absolutely agree that abortion should be illegal for anybody, under any circumstances (except in the rare case the mother's life is endangered and no other solution such as a C-section will work), on a federal level.

I'm not going to argue over the "when does life begin" question, because there just is no convincing people on this point, I've found. You either think it's a person or you don't. I do believe it's a human being, and nothing justifies being able to kill an innocent human being, but that's not the main issue for me.

Some folks here are saying "pro-lifers want to gatekeep people's sexual lives." Yes and no. Obviously you're free to do what you want, but here's the thing: your choices have consequences. The primary purpose of sex is to have kids, period. Yes, it feels good, it's an intimate act between lovers, it gives you that massive dopamine hit, and people will do it for reasons other than reproducing, but at the end of the day, all of those things are secondary. The main purpose of sex is babies. There is no getting around this. It's what sex is designed to do. Man fertilizes woman, woman makes baby. Any time you have sex, at least heterosexual, penis-in-vagina sex, you are running the risk of making a baby.

This is the entire reason sex used to be restricted to marriage, and why it was so shameful to have pre-marital sex. People back then understood that sex leads to babies, and that if you're not married and you don't have a stable family, that kid is going to suffer. Therefore, sex was something they restricted to marriage. It was saying "look, if you get a kid from this, you're going to have to raise that kid, and you'll want to be in the best possible position for it. Get married first."

People, before abortion was widely available, understood this. This is why shotgun weddings existed. People said "oh shit, we're having a kid, we better get married so we can help take care of this kid." It forced people to be responsible adults, exercise some self-control, and think twice about having casual flings and hookups. Of course, not everybody adhered to this standard, because humans are humans and we fuck up all the time, but it generally happened a lot less frequently.

Fast forward to today. Abortion is basically used as a "get out of jail free" card. You can bring up rape, incest, birth defects, whatever. The reality is that, for over 95% of abortions, it's simply due to convenience. Abortion is used as a late form of contraception. People now feel they can have as much wild, promiscuous sex as they want, and fuck getting married, I can just abort the baby. This has had the disastrous side effect of destroying relationships, devaluing sex into a drug, and ironically, insanely high rates of single-parenthood as some people just keep the baby anyways.

Marriage was the pre-requisite for sex for two reasons. First, because kids need a mother and a father. Not one mom, or two moms, or two dads; one mom and one dad. No more, no less. That's what marriage was. This is the environment children thrive under. But the second reason is it forced you to be responsible. It was a tradeoff to make people be better contributors to society. Marriage is something that's difficult to maintain, and requires you to be responsible, mature, and restrain yourself so you aren't a rabid, wild animal enslaved by your basest desires. Society basically said to people:

"Look, we know you want sex. Sex feels good, right? Here's our offer. You grow up, become a responsible adult, marry someone and stick with them, and in return, you can have as much sex as you want. Deal?" Sex and marriage were intertwined for this reason.

Now, thanks to abortion, all of that has gone out the window. Why should a woman be loyal, be responsible, and get married, when she can just have as much sex as she wants with as many Chads as she wants and just abort every baby that comes along with it? Likewise, why should a man settle down and be a responsible adult when he can fuck as many low-self-esteem girls he wants and they can just abort it? Abortion has completely removed the consequences and tradeoffs that came with sex, and now with everybody able to just fuck whoever they want with no consequences, there's no reason anymore to get married, or grow up, or be a responsible adult, or be a parent. Just indulge your base lusts like a common animal and give in to your passions. Fuck responsibility.

I firmly believe that, thanks to things like abortion, this is why we have such declining birth rates, failing marriages, skyrocketing divorce rates, high single-parenthood rates, and more people than ever just saying "fuck marriage, I'll stay single and lurk in bars for the rest of my life!" And the huge irony of all of this is that these people won't realize just how much it will make them unhappy until it's too late. How many women, and even men for that matter, live like this, get to around 35-40 years old, realize they're old, single, miserable, and alone, and they're too old now to be seen as desirable by either sex?

Is abortion the sole cause for this? No, of course not, but it is a significant contributor. So yes, I do want to ban it, and yes, I do want to gate-keep your sex lives. You being a rampant coomer who exists only to get your rocks off damages society in ways that you won't even realize for the next 30 years. Giving people that easy out of being a responsible adult in the form of abortion is a net detriment to society, and I am 100% in favor of getting it completely banned, nationwide, for everyone.

You may all rate me dumb and autistic now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back