Ahhh, Jim talking about capitalism bad again. Name a more iconic duo. How it was in the song again?
Which is hilarious, considering he would never be able to make a living as he does in any communist or even socialist State. Can't think of any systems based on equalitarianism that would allow someone as dug into superfluous consumption as Jim is to spend so many resources in exchange for little in terms of results!
In fact, Jim's lifestyle is only viable on capitalist countries, more specifically in Western Democracies. His way of life goes directly against the tenets of authoritarian governments, which is almost always the case with socialist states, and is naturally not allowed in any left wing authoritarian states. Even if Jim just wants state-run enterprises to socialize everything, there's no way they would be pushing out plastic toys for many different franchises instead of simply spending these resources in other ways. For someone who bitches incessantly about capitalism and greed, Jim surely earns a lot of money for pulling almost no efforts at all!
Fuck, I'm cool with personal consumption and I don't think this makes him a hypocrite no matter how bonkers a system would need to be to mix actual socialist tenets and consumerism, and to stay viable on the long term. What makes Jim a hypocrite in my eyes is how his hatred of everyone outside of his little world permeates fucking everything, some guy putting lots of company resources on a project, possibly risking his career over a fuckup and thus trying to maximize profits is greedy and nobody should have that kind of money on their hands, while it's fine for him to sit on his ass and reheat the same content over and over for a few videos while pulling 6 figures for it over a year is perfectly fine, tax the rich, but following my own definition that doesn't include myself, and so on. This guy couldn't be more incoherent if he fucking wanted!
I was gonna go for the atrocious side-cut and bubblegum pink hair or the fact that their arm is so fucking wide that the very large tattoo is somehow mildly lopsided now.
With that 60 year old aunt physique, a normal cut makes she look far older than she is and this cut looks more youthful albeit more bizarre. Cut the blubber and they look fine, it really fucking ages people lol!
I wonder what sort of mental disability or idiocy pushes grown people to tattoo the brand or symbol of some fat retard tranny on their body for all to see. I saw it with that tranny Erin Reed that has the R*ddit logo on his arm and now this hamplanet genderblob married to a deranged tranny has Jim's logo on her/his arm (too fat to correctly identify as anything).
How do you explain that crap to any normal well adjusted person (if they even interact with anyone normal)?
Tattoos should have a meaning. I'm cool with someone having a tattoo of whatever they want, but I must admit I have more respect for bad tattoos that have a meaning at least. If some guy decided to tattoo a Cinema Festival logo for no reason, it's bad, if they did so because they got their break as a director on that festival, I can respect that. That being said, it looks like a less meaningful tattoo on this case, but people nowadays worship some fucking randoms on the internet, so who knows. There are people who worship people like fucking Hasan, Ethan Klein and even Keffals, whose shtick is literally ratioing people as if it meant fucking anything instead of debating them, a colossal display of immaturity!