Supreme Court Watch

[Zaryiu2]

Well California decided to take further revenge on Clarence Thomas by leaking the information of every CCW holder's personal information.

Also fun fact is that the city of San Francisco only had 4 CCWs lol.

Also Tucker decided to talk about Corporate America embracing abortions.

The people trying to destroy America speaking in the clips in the Tucker video is legitimately staring the face of evil in the eyes, these people are pure evil

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

The fact that our Vice President is talking about Roe Vs. Wade like it was an amendment pulled from the Bill of Rights is fucking embarrassing, I would argue this is more embarrassing than the Afghan pullout. The highest officials in the executive branch don't know what the other two branches of government are. The *President and *Vice President think the Judicial branch can perform an action exclusive to Congress.

 

[Joe Swanson]

Message shared by my wife as a side effect of the abortion stuff:
View attachment 3437599
If true, this doctor is retarded. Ectopic pregnancies aren't abortions and maybe you should focus on saving lives rather than engaging in CYA lawyer calling behavior.

It was pointed out somewhere in the mess of this thread that most (if not all) of these states that have outright banned abortion have the exception for when the would be mother's life is in danger for this very reason.

 

[sylvan_wanderer]

Oh noes, the Chinese are in Brazil! It's Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0!

Who sold the American manufacturing base to China? It's was Henry something or other in the Nixon administration. Must be a coincidence. Oh, look, that Sorkin guy is also doing shitty stuff. Wow, another coincidence, right? Yelen, wait, wat, another coincidence?

Stay tuned next week for another gripping instalment on how China runs America.

Oh noes, the Chinese are in Brazil! It's Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0!

Who sold the American manufacturing base to China? It's was Henry something or other in the Nixon administration. Must be a coincidence. Oh, look, that Sorkin guy is also doing shitty stuff. Wow, another coincidence, right? Yelen, wait, wat, another coincidence?

Stay tuned next week for another gripping instalment on how China runs America.

Holy smokes guys, Victoria Nuland, she of 2014 Maidan is also Chinese? No, can't be. So Voltamort Zalynskyyyy also Chinese? WTF. Mayorkas, Blinken , and Garland all Chinese? Phew, looks like the Chinese have taken over, ryte guize?!?!?!

 

[Slap47]

This is proof that Democrats are just racists who hide their racism. If a black person does something to piss them off hard enough, they resort to using lesser racial slurs like "coon" because they're not prepared to commit to just calling him a "nigger."

All of their bloviating about white privilege is just their "ethical" way of expressing the white supremacy they personally feel but know not to express nakedly, so they have to beat around the bush with overtly complex forms of racism like Critical Race Theory.

CRT is just regular racism with extra steps.

Resetera is strange. They basically give black-identifying users the freedom to say coon and yes, even nigger.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

I've read the highlights but don't have the autism to slag through the slapfights so I hope this hasn't been covered but there is an update in the gun case:

As we know, SCOTUS invalidated NY's effective ban on carry licenses in which the city and counties could insist that people prove a specific, individual threat in order to carry a pistol (i.e. general self defense against crime was not enough). Now, states must provide a means for people to obtain such a license (although there is, as yet, no ruling on how tedious that process must be). This is relevant for only a few states which have no such process, like CA, NY, NJ, MD, HI.

NY and California- the two states which have had a pissing contest for years over which can institute the most mind-numbingly stupid and useless gun control- now have a plan, in two parts, to be created and passed ASAP, out of spite:

First, they will make carry licenses they are forced to issue completely useless by making everywhere a 'sensitive location' where they do not apply. This includes every single business in the state which does not specifically exempt itself from the law (which will be 99.9% of them for liability purposes). That means that everyone who has already or goes through the long (and often expensive) process to obtain a pistol carry license in those states will find that they are now only able to bear arms from their house to the sidewalk... unless they happen to be near a health care facility, government building, park, any sort of public transportation, "public gathering," school, daycare, municipal building, sports area, financial institution, or any of a dozen other "sensitive" places in which case you better just stay the fuck inside. Also note that carrying a gun and locking it in your car in a parking lots of any of the above, including private businesses, is also illegal. In short, this makes things much worse for anyone who actually has a carry permit in those two states (and there are many, as long as it's not in the cities). This completely guts/flouts the Thomas decision and is basically putting gun owners in a worse place than they were beforehand (surely the point).

Second, they will make the process of obtaining such a permit even more prohibitively expensive in time and money to stop anyone from actually doing it, while potentially invalidating all current licenses. "More extensive background checks" may sound fine until one learns that the current process of getting a license evidently takes 12-18 months and requires multiple references living in the county who have known the subject for years (so if you just moved... fuck you). 15-20 hours of training may sound fine until one learns that the process already costs hundreds of dollars and 20 hours of 'training' including live fire will cost hundreds more, all borne by the applicant. They will probably also remove the process from counties, some of which have been getting a little too 'friendly' to people who want to get a license to carry. This 'red tape' prohibition has not yet been addressed by SCOTUS which has, hitherto, left states alone to come up with the ways in which they want to bend people over the barrel.

 

[sylvan_wanderer]

Heebs, instead of just pressing "dumb"or "autistic" on my poasts when we point out Jews as the obvious common denominator in what is all that is wrong with our society try arguing the point.

Noticing has intensified.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I've read the highlights but don't have the autism to slag through the slapfights so I hope this hasn't been covered. Just a note about the responses to the gun decision:

As we know, SCOTUS invalidated NY's effective ban on carry licenses in which the city and counties could insist that people prove a specific, individual threat in order to carry a pistol (i.e. general self defense against crime was not enough). Now, states must provide a means for people to obtain such a license (although there is, as yet, no ruling on how tedious that process must be). This is relevant for only a few states which have no such process, like CA, NY, NJ, MD, HI.

NY and California- the two states which have had a pissing contest for years over which can institute the most mind-numbingly stupid and useless gun control- now have a plan, in two parts, to be created and passed ASAP, out of spite:

First, they will make carry licenses they are forced to issue completely useless by making everywhere a 'sensitive location' where they do not apply. This includes every single business in the state which does not specifically exempt itself from the law (which will be 99.9% of them for liability purposes). That means that everyone who has already or goes through the long (and often expensive) process to obtain a pistol carry license in those states will find that they are now only able to bear arms from their house to the sidewalk... unless they happen to be near a health care facility, government building, park, any sort of public transportation, "public gathering," school, daycare, municipal building, sports area, financial institution, or any of a dozen other "sensitive" places in which case you better just stay the fuck inside. Also note that carrying a gun and locking it in your car in a parking lots of any of the above, including private businesses, is also illegal. In short, this makes things much worse for anyone who actually has a carry permit in those two states (and there are many, as long as it's not in the cities). This completely guts/flouts the Thomas decision.

Second, they will make the process of obtaining such a permit even more prohibitively expensive in time and money to stop anyone from actually doing it, while potentially invalidating all current licenses. "More extensive background checks" may sound fine until one learns that the current process of getting a license evidently takes 12-18 months and requires multiple references who have known the subject for years. 15-20 hours of training may sound fine until one learns that the process already costs hundreds of dollars and 20 hours of 'training' including live fire will cost hundreds more, all borne by the applicant. They will probably also remove the process from counties, some of which have been getting a little too 'friendly' to people who want to get a license to carry. This 'red tape' prohibition has not yet been addressed by SCOTUS which has, hitherto, left states alone to come up with the ways in which they want to bend people over the barrel.

Don't interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake.

The instant somebody gets in trouble over either of these two pieces of gun control legislation, it can be appealed to the Supreme Court and get slapped down. I bet the six red Justices would be more than eager to tell California they're breaking the Second Amendment.

I really hope that California and New York go through a process of throwing every legal idea for gun control (and the kitchen sink) at the Supreme Court and all of it goes up in smoke and CA/NY have to accept that 2A is the word of the law.

2A states "shall not be infringed," which means no red tape bullshit to get in the way, which is exactly what they're doing. The smart move would be to wait for all the elderly Justices to pass of old age and try to shove Democrats in so they could make this move but nope, they react like an autoimmune disease instead.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

Do the state abortion laws not already do that? Sounds like the doctor was just incompetent.

Yes. And these state laws have been on the books for years. And the SCOTUS decision was leaked, what, a month ago? Plenty of time for anyone who may need to know to talk to a lawyer so they don't have to let someone (allegedly) bleed out or whatever because they couldn't bother until that moment.

Edit to avoid dp:

Don't interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake.

The instant somebody gets in trouble over either of these two pieces of gun control legislation, it can be appealed to the Supreme Court and get slapped down. I bet the six red Justices would be more than eager to tell California they're breaking the Second Amendment.

I really hope that California and New York go through a process of throwing every legal idea for gun control (and the kitchen sink) at the Supreme Court and all of it goes up in smoke and CA/NY have to accept that 2A is the word of the law.

2A states "shall not be infringed," which means no red tape bullshit to get in the way, which is exactly what they're doing. The smart move would be to wait for all the elderly Justices to pass of old age and try to shove Democrats in so they could make this move but nope, they react like an autoimmune disease instead.

It took many years for all of these cases to get to adjudication. Theoretically this could take less time, as a lower court SHOULD apply the recent case and start tossing things quicker, but it still takes time (the 9th circuit has already refused to apply the new ruling in a 2-1 ruling, although I can't find the citation atm). They are throwing a shit-ton of stuff at the wall and creating a complete mess to untangle. I'd love to see SCOTUS take extraordinary action and basically issue an injunction against all of it, citing bad faith, but I just don't think it works that way.

There's another potential issue here- Justice Thomas can write his ruling, but can he enforce it?


(pictured above: actual NYC councilmembers who have now also suggested doing exactly this by making anyplace with over 10,000 people per mile off limits)

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

I've read the highlights but don't have the autism to slag through the slapfights so I hope this hasn't been covered but there is an update in the gun case:

As we know, SCOTUS invalidated NY's effective ban on carry licenses in which the city and counties could insist that people prove a specific, individual threat in order to carry a pistol (i.e. general self defense against crime was not enough). Now, states must provide a means for people to obtain such a license (although there is, as yet, no ruling on how tedious that process must be). This is relevant for only a few states which have no such process, like CA, NY, NJ, MD, HI.

NY and California- the two states which have had a pissing contest for years over which can institute the most mind-numbingly stupid and useless gun control- now have a plan, in two parts, to be created and passed ASAP, out of spite:

First, they will make carry licenses they are forced to issue completely useless by making everywhere a 'sensitive location' where they do not apply. This includes every single business in the state which does not specifically exempt itself from the law (which will be 99.9% of them for liability purposes). That means that everyone who has already or goes through the long (and often expensive) process to obtain a pistol carry license in those states will find that they are now only able to bear arms from their house to the sidewalk... unless they happen to be near a health care facility, government building, park, any sort of public transportation, "public gathering," school, daycare, municipal building, sports area, financial institution, or any of a dozen other "sensitive" places in which case you better just stay the fuck inside. Also note that carrying a gun and locking it in your car in a parking lots of any of the above, including private businesses, is also illegal. In short, this makes things much worse for anyone who actually has a carry permit in those two states (and there are many, as long as it's not in the cities). This completely guts/flouts the Thomas decision and is basically putting gun owners in a worse place than they were beforehand (surely the point).

Second, they will make the process of obtaining such a permit even more prohibitively expensive in time and money to stop anyone from actually doing it, while potentially invalidating all current licenses. "More extensive background checks" may sound fine until one learns that the current process of getting a license evidently takes 12-18 months and requires multiple references living in the county who have known the subject for years (so if you just moved... fuck you). 15-20 hours of training may sound fine until one learns that the process already costs hundreds of dollars and 20 hours of 'training' including live fire will cost hundreds more, all borne by the applicant. They will probably also remove the process from counties, some of which have been getting a little too 'friendly' to people who want to get a license to carry. This 'red tape' prohibition has not yet been addressed by SCOTUS which has, hitherto, left states alone to come up with the ways in which they want to bend people over the barrel.

On point 2, that's why they should have gone with constitutional carry instead of shall-issue licenses. They were always going to go with the bad-faith implementation. And then there's California's spergout by doxing all CCW license holders.

 

[sylvan_wanderer]

This guy just stuffed my wife's boyfriend's aborted baby back into her cunt.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Don't interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake.

The instant somebody gets in trouble over either of these two pieces of gun control legislation, it can be appealed to the Supreme Court and get slapped down. I bet the six red Justices would be more than eager to tell California they're breaking the Second Amendment.

I really hope that California and New York go through a process of throwing every legal idea for gun control (and the kitchen sink) at the Supreme Court and all of it goes up in smoke and CA/NY have to accept that 2A is the word of the law.

2A states "shall not be infringed," which means no red tape bullshit to get in the way, which is exactly what they're doing. The smart move would be to wait for all the elderly Justices to pass of old age and try to shove Democrats in so they could make this move but nope, they react like an autoimmune disease instead.

I don't think so. Many states with concealed carry have had such restrictions for years. You'd think Louisiana would be pretty based but no. CC licenses are pretty easy to get however you're not allowed to carry inside any place that serves alcohol (every single restaurant and most businesses in the state), you're not allowed to carry at any gathering or event that required a permit to hold (which is every Mardi Gras parade, festival, meeting, etc) and you're not allowed to carry inside any gov't building or place where an elected official might be (which eliminates everywhere else). Basically you can carry in the grocery store and that's about it.

 

[sylvan_wanderer]

On point 2, that's why they should have gone with constitutional carry instead of shall-issue licenses. They were always going to go with the bad-faith implementation. And then there's California's spergout by doxing all CCW license holders.

You people are fucking ridiculous. How would anything you are arguing about change the fact that Jews have destroyed your families and social order and niggers are running buck wild?

Show me on the doll where arguing about guns and abortion solves this...

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

If true, this doctor is retarded. Ectopic pregnancies aren't abortions and maybe you should focus on saving lives rather than engaging in CYA lawyer calling behavior.

Abortions are used to stop the woman from dying when she has an ectopic pregnancy, dude. So yeah, they would have had to call a lawyer.

See this is why people don't want people like you controlling women's bodies

And I will retain that agency by not getting snipped.

So you're fine with removing women's bodily autonomy but not your own

 

[sylvan_wanderer]

Abortions are used to stop the woman from dying when she has an ectopic pregnancy, dude. So yeah, they would have had to call a lawyer.

See this is why people don't want people like you controlling women's bodies


So you're fine with removing women's bodily autonomy but not your own

This, right here, is why women should not have a voice.

They try to make it about medical emergency, 1 in 100,000 type shit or incest and rape.

Bitches, we all know it's about you not wanting to be beholden to a man and start a family.

All your feminist heroes were yentas, and they had loads of kids.

Fuck off

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

This, right here, is why women should not have a voice.

They try to make it about medical emergency, 1 in 100,000 type shit or incest and rape.

Bitches, we all know it's about you not wanting to be beholden to a man and start a family.

All your feminist heroes were yentas, and they had loads of kids.

Fuck off

Lol what? Because some guy on Kiwi Farms doesn't know what an ectopic pregnancy is, women shouldn't have a voice?

Look, I realize you don't like abortions. That's fine, it's your right. But then don't get one.

 

[Cilleystring]

Look, I realize you don't like abortions vaccines. That's fine, it's your right. But then don't get one.

Just because I'm a shit disturber

 

[sylvan_wanderer]

Lol what? Because some guy on Kiwi Farms doesn't know what an ectopic pregnancy is, women shouldn't have a voice?

Look, I realize you don't like abortions. That's fine, it's your right. But then don't get one.

The likes of you pretending statistical outliers are cause for hair on fire weirdos pissing themselves outside the Supreme Court is somehow a reason that our society should venerate killing our unborn is why women should not have a voice.

Just because I'm a shit disturber

Not on my watch, Nazi!

 

[JohnDoe]

NY and California- the two states which have had a pissing contest for years over which can institute the most mind-numbingly stupid and useless gun control- now have a plan, in two parts, to be created and passed ASAP, out of spite:

these two pieces of gun control legislation, it can be appealed to the Supreme Court and get slapped down. I bet the six red Justices would be more than eager to tell California they're breaking the Second Amendment.

The latest decision was, by SCOTUS standard, pretty aggressive and it was so because the states and the lower courts have been playing exactly these games. All these obstinate games will only result in the next decision being additionally restrictive - they're going to end up with Constitutional Carry and a strictly enumerated lost of 'sensitive places' if they keep this up.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Just because I'm a shit disturber

I can respect that