Supreme Court Watch

[SneedEyeMitch]

Americans, what are the implications of this West Virginia vs the EPA ruling? Any chance the ATF can be disbanded over it?

It will basically limit the executive branch on what it can and can't do.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Americans, what are the implications of this West Virginia vs the EPA ruling? Any chance the ATF can be disbanded over it?

The ATF won't be disbanded but their ability to change major firearms laws by fiddling with definitions on a whim might be stopped.

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

There is a low chance it ends Chevron difference which would force a lot of machine gun cases to get relitigated (along with pretty much everything else). It would be hard to predict what actually happens.

The ATF won't be disbanded but their ability to change major firearms laws by fiddling with definitions on a whim might be stopped.

Got it. Reading up more about it, seems that it will effectively castrate a lot of the three-letter agencies, making a bigger impact than RvW ever did. Would be entertaining, that's for sure.

 

[Puff]

Got it. Reading up more about it, seems that it will effectively castrate a lot of the three-letter agencies, making a bigger impact than RvW ever did. Would be entertaining, that's for sure.

I expect a narrow ruling, but I did for Dobbs and NYRPA too.
It's also the last thing being released despite the ridiculously controversial Roe overturn being on the same docket.

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

I expect a narrow ruling, but I did for Dobbs and NYRPA too.
It's also the last thing being released despite the ridiculously controversial Roe overturn being on the same docket.

If it happens, the levels of salt will be through the roof, holy shit. With RvW no one cared that much except for the usual suspects, but this is going to hit a lot of unelected bureaucrats right in their, to quote Putin, "decision-making centers". I expect a lot more screeching from the media too.

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

This argument always makes me laugh. This was proposed in the book Freakonomics (2005) that was then peddled in every university as mandatory reading in certain required classes. I remember distinctly having to read it. Although interesting. it's merely another way of looking at it. Nonetheless, after 20 years of pushing it as gospel people do indeed believe this notion that abortion means less crime is the absolute truth.

If anything it proves the efficacy of forcing a generation of people where most attend university to read and digest various materials you deem important. In an effort to shape the cultural thought on topics important to your cause (leftists). The long march through the institutions indeed.

So that's why those retards project their racism onto the conservicucks.

 

[Netizennameless]

Stop combining my poasts, you jew nigger tranny kiwi jannies.

I am an artiste, and I will be heard in my own voice. Damn you!

For the love of god don't start sperging at the thunderdome despot. I actually like their moderation style and would like them to stick around.

 

[Getting tard comed]

Wait why is this a partisan ruling? I don't really know the details here at all but it sounds pretty whatever. Or is it just MUH SACRED NATIVES?

Gorsech joined the dissent so probably agaisnt goverment overreach. Idk though would be interested in the break down.


Is the EPA decision predicted to go agaisnt the 3 letter agencies?

 

[Celebrate Nite]

Article: https://longisland.news12.com/cvs-removes-purchase-limits-on-emergency-contraception
Archive: https://archive.ph/MgMkx
------------------------------------------
CVS removes purchase limits on emergency contraception

CVS is removing the purchase limit it had put on emergency contraceptive pills following last week's Supreme Court ruling.

CVS along with Rite Aid and Amazon all put limits on the number of Plan B pills people could buy. It was three per transaction, but people can now purchase as many as they want.

CVS implemented that limitation due to an increase in demand for the pills after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

CVS says it initially put the limit in place to "ensure equitable access and consistent supply on store shelves."

The pharmacy chain says there was a spike in sales of the Plan B pill, but now that has stabilized.

According to health officials, the emergency contraception pills do not cause an abortion and prevent pregnancy from occurring in the first place.
------------------------------------------

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Article: https://longisland.news12.com/cvs-removes-purchase-limits-on-emergency-contraception
Archive: https://archive.ph/MgMkx
------------------------------------------
CVS removes purchase limits on emergency contraception

CVS is removing the purchase limit it had put on emergency contraceptive pills following last week's Supreme Court ruling.

CVS along with Rite Aid and Amazon all put limits on the number of Plan B pills people could buy. It was three per transaction, but people can now purchase as many as they want.

CVS implemented that limitation due to an increase in demand for the pills after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

CVS says it initially put the limit in place to "ensure equitable access and consistent supply on store shelves."

The pharmacy chain says there was a spike in sales of the Plan B pill, but now that has stabilized.

According to health officials, the emergency contraception pills do not cause an abortion and prevent pregnancy from occurring in the first place.
------------------------------------------

Hmmm, I sense an opportunity....

 

[MrJokerRager]

Gorsech joined the dissent so probably agaisnt goverment overreach. Idk though would be interested in the break down.


Is the EPA decision predicted to go agaisnt the 3 letter agencies?

Liberals on SCOTUSblog comments section where predicting it might go against the conservatives, which is why they delaying it for Thursday or Friday.

 

[SneedEyeMitch]

Liberals on SCOTUSblog comments section where predicting it might go against the conservatives, which is why they delaying it for Thursday or Friday.

counter narrative they left it last as a final fuck you to the feds as the ruling would be attacking them directly.

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

counter narrative they left it last as a final fuck you to the feds as the ruling would be attacking them directly.

It does make sense to leave the most controversial ruling for last, yeah. They can just fuck off to their bunkers afterwards.

 

[Magicicada_septendecula]

>conservatives mad
>conservatives want abortion gone
>abortions are now gone in the most black states
>conservatives happy
>deadly crimes surge in 20 years due to influx of poor black babies born in southern states
>more restrictive gun laws are passed
>conservatives mad

There are a few things going against it playing out this way. Abortion will still be legal in places like New Jersey, New York, and Illinois, which have the real violent shit hole cities. Meanwhile, save for some libtard whites in New England and in/around Colorado, white girls will be stuck with their babies. As for the blacks in Mississippi and Alabama, I could live with more of them, southern blacks are pretty chill.

 

[SneedEyeMitch]

There are a few things going against it playing out this way. Abortion will still be legal in places like New Jersey, New York, and Illinois, which have the real violent shit hole cities. Meanwhile, save for some libtard whites in New England and in/around Colorado, white girls will be stuck with their babies. As for the blacks in Mississippi and Alabama, I could live with more of them, southern blacks are pretty chill.

Also a lot of "there will be more blacks" operate under the assumption that blacks follow the law.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Liberals on SCOTUSblog comments section where predicting it might go against the conservatives, which is why they delaying it for Thursday or Friday.

That doesn't make any sense. Nothing about this court indicates any 'F You' coming for conservatives. A win is expected its just up in the air how big of a win.

 

[AnotherPleb]

Only two opinions released today. That still leaves two for this term. The next opinion day is not announced yet.

The remaining cases are important ones, involving immigration and the environment.

Edit: They just announced tomorrow as an opinion day, probably the last of the term.

They're gonna cheese it hard, and with the other rulings I can see this shit getting spicy.

It will basically limit the executive branch on what it can and can't do.

Oh let them drop the hammer on the alphabet agencies.

If it happens, the levels of salt will be through the roof, holy shit. With RvW no one cared that much except for the usual suspects, but this is going to hit a lot of unelected bureaucrats right in their, to quote Putin, "decision-making centers". I expect a lot more screeching from the media too.

If they go full bore this will send shockwaves through the swamp that will make Trump look mild in comparison.

 

[Weppers]

That doesn't make any sense. Nothing about this court indicates any 'F You' coming for conservatives. A win is expected its just up in the air how big of a win.

In a world of political magical thinking, predictions are wishes.

 

[Confederate Fag]

But women are the ones that care about this. Don't want a baby, get your tubes tied. Is it irreversible? I don't care, it's not my body. I'm not getting snipped when I can just not impregnate a girl I don't like.

I really don’t care about your feelings, or anyone else’s for that matter. I was just correcting your extremely incorrect assumptions regarding these medical procedures.

 

[SBG]

I know the usual fags are shit flinging but did anyone see this? (I might be late, I don't want to dig through 20 pages of autism)
https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/exploration-survival/west-virginia-v-epa/
Archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220629133232/https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/exploration-survival/west-virginia-v-epa/

If the implications are as far reaching as I think they might be, this would be the first step in neutering the three letter agencies control on the choices made by the Government.
Glow niggers on suicide watch.

Just sounds like a lot of scaremongering or cheerleading for retards. Groups like the FBI are meant to enforce the law as it was written, so it shouldn't be some grand travesty if they're limited from making up laws themselves.

What Dems have wanted to do for a while is have federal agencies just make up their own rules so that they didn't need to get the votes in congress to pass those same rules. So if SCOTUS ruled against the EPA it probably wouldn't affect the FBI or CIA so much as prevent groups like the EPA just making shit up as they go along.

Given this court’s enthusiasm for throwing out established precedent in favor of achieving longstanding right wing political goals, that’s concerning.

“In that sense, this seems like a power grab,” Bethany Davis Noll, executive director of the State Energy and Environmental Impact Center at New York University School of Law, told E&E News.

Retards like this are acting like it's a power grab to not give a federal agency a power it was never allowed by congress to have.

They're also acting like it's somehow massively strange that even though the regulation in question wasn't enacted that a court case is still going on. When that's pretty normal. It's like if you had someone sue over a wrongful gag order and then the person that asked for that gag order decided to have it dropped before the court could look at the case. The court could still go forward with the case to help set precedent, which is the same shit happening here, the courts want to just have the precedent set because this is a major problem worth addressing.

Federal agencies do get a lot of leeway about how they run themselves, but it's a bit different when those federal agencies are telling private businesses how they be run. Might be why the courts feel this is worth ruling on.