Crime (Update) Arrest Made in Rape of Ohio 10-Year-Old Who Had to Travel Out of State for Abortion

Link: https://www.thedailybeast.com/colum...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll
Archive: http://archive.md/2022.07.13-203034...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll


2BD82FDD-0F45-461E-A597-E6E5B37D2512.jpeg

An Ohio man was arrested Tuesday for raping a 10-year-old girl who became a central figure in the debate over abortion rights after she reportedly traveled to Indiana to have an abortion when Ohio outlawed the procedure last month.

Arrest records and court records viewed by The Daily Beast confirm that Gerson Fuentes, 27, was arrested Tuesday in Franklin County on a felony charge of raping a person under 13. The Columbus Dispatch, who first reported on his arrest, attended Fuentes’ arraignment in Columbus on Wednesday.

The unidentified girl’s plight became national news when the Indianapolis Star quoted a doctor who said a 10-year-old rape victim, who was six weeks and three days pregnant, had been forced to travel from her home in Columbus to Indiana for an abortion. Her home state had a trigger law that immediately outlawed abortions after six weeks once the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

A Columbus Police detective, identified by the Dispatch as Jeffrey Huhn, testified in court Wednesday that the 10-year-old victim was impregnated and had an abortion in Indianapolis.


“The victim went out of state to have a medically terminated abortion,” he said, according to video of the arraignment.

The video showed Fuentes staring blankly during the arraignment and standing with a slouch as a translator relayed the proceedings to him in Spanish.

Court records say the alleged rape occurred on May 12. Detectives said in court that police were made aware of the girl’s pregnancy through a referral filed with the local child services’ branch by her mother on June 22. Eight days later, the girl had the abortion in Indianapolis.

The aborted fetus has since been tested for DNA and entered into evidence, Huhn said, and officials say Fuentes confessed to the rape when he was questioned.

Fuentes’ arrest comes as conservative media claimed the girl’s story was made up for political theater, something parroted by Fox News presenters as recently as Tuesday night—while Fuentes was already in custody.

But those also with egg on their face in light of the horrific crime: the top law-enforcement official in Ohio.

Indeed, state Attorney General Dave Yost spent much of the past week effectively dubbing the story a hoax, suggesting he had heard nothing about any such crime being reported.

“We have a decentralized law enforcement system in Ohio, but we have regular contact with prosecutors and local police and sheriffs,” Yost said in a Fox News segment Monday. “Not a whisper anywhere.”


Yost released a statement Wednesday afternoon that did not address his previous comments.

“My heart aches for the pain suffered by this young child,” he said. “I am grateful for the diligent work of the Columbus Police Department in securing a confession and getting a rapist off the street.”

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, the Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist who first described the rape and its aftermath to the Indy Star, previously told The Daily Beast she expected vindication.

“It will all come out in time,” she said via text message on Tuesday.


Court records show Fuentes is being held on a bond of $2 million. The judge said he was considered a flight risk and, given the brutality of the crime, a high bail was necessary to protect the child involved.

—with reporting by Pilar Melendez
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who would say this? Beaner rapist or no, ten year old girls should not be pregnant. Ever. It is physically dangerous for them to do so, and the most adult thing stable and happy kids do at that age is some household chores or mowing the lawn. Ten year olds shouldn't even be having sex, they should be enjoying the last 2 to 4 years of childhood before puberty comes crashing in and shit gets weird. Any kid having sex at that age is being abused, and will 100.00% grow up wrong.

I don't care if they've got my politics, anyone who blames a child rape victim and says the whore should've just not been raped if she didn't want a child is out of their damned mind. This should not be a matter of using the girl as a free token to shill for pro-choice or life, it should be a matter of not letting this taco stand upright for the rest of his life.

Never mind, found someone who would say it.
You were apparently not here for the original thread where I had to argue with some weird autistic men that no a 10 year old rape victim should not be forced to give birth against her will. I don't know, these people are fucked in the head and their misogyny apparently translates to 10 year old girls as well. Scary stuff.
 
You were apparently not here for the original thread where I had to argue with some weird autistic men that no a 10 year old rape victim should not be forced to give birth against her will. I don't know, these people are fucked in the head and their misogyny apparently translates to 10 year old girls as well. Scary stuff.
This has nothing to do with misogyny. It's about doing what is right.
 
You were apparently not here for the original thread where I had to argue with some weird autistic men that no a 10 year old rape victim should not be forced to give birth against her will. I don't know, these people are fucked in the head and their misogyny apparently translates to 10 year old girls as well. Scary stuff.
Calm down, Karen. Even if he's not just trolling he can't hurt you through the internet.
 
I don't get why people think I am trolling or why they find the idea so wrong. Would you prefer we kill an innocent child?
I moderated the statement very well. It's hard to tell these days.

Here's not the place to get into it, but on edge cases like this I prefer to punt and let people make their own decisions and deal with the morality themselves. It's too fucked for me to try and figure out the actual right answer. I'm just going to ignore the problem.
 
I moderated the statement very well. It's hard to tell these days.

Here's not the place to get into it, but on edge cases like this I prefer to punt and let people make their own decisions and deal with the morality themselves. It's too fucked for me to try and figure out the actual right answer. I'm just going to ignore the problem.
Normally I'd agree with you but we're talking about an innocent kid here.
You could kill both mother and child if the kid is forced to carry to term. Do you know of any ten year olds who have a body capable of carrying a child? Sit the fuck down.
Ok look, if it's impossible for them both to survive fine do it. But if there is a chance that both can live, then you have to do that. End of discussion.
 
You could kill both mother and child if the kid is forced to carry to term. Do you know of any ten year olds who have a body capable of carrying a child? Sit the fuck down.
"Could", it can be evaluated on a case-by-case basis rather than by statue exempting all 10 year olds or something.
If you're worried about the health of the mother, the LAW ALREADY COVERS THAT.
Fucking retards.
Normally I'd agree with you but we're talking about an innocent kid here.

Ok look, if it's impossible for them both to survive fine do it. But if there is a chance that both can live, then you have to do that. End of discussion.
If I had to care about every dead kid, I'd be up all night. Not my monkey, not my circus.
 
"Could", it can be evaluated on a case-by-case basis rather than by statue exempting all 10 year olds or something.
If you're worried about the health of the mother, the LAW ALREADY COVERS THAT.
Fucking retards.
I don't even think it should be health of the mother since that is way too broad. It should be the life of the mother or no exceptions at all.
 
Normally I'd agree with you but we're talking about an innocent kid here.

Ok look, if it's impossible for them both to survive fine do it. But if there is a chance that both can live, then you have to do that. End of discussion.

"Could", it can be evaluated on a case-by-case basis rather than by statue exempting all 10 year olds or something.
If you're worried about the health of the mother, the LAW ALREADY COVERS THAT.
Fucking retards.

If I had to care about every dead kid, I'd be up all night. Not my monkey, not my circus.
But then y'all are the first to bitch when some faggot who was raised in a broken home goes on a crime spree and repeats the cycle. Hmm, I wonder if there's a solution for this?
You really want these kids to be born into families that can't take care of the rape children, grow up to commit crimes and not see the issue here?

Look at the history of recent mass shooters and how many of them came from situations that could've been easily resolved if the mother aborted the baby or at least had the option to. Look at how many of these street rats who go and commit violent crimes that were born to child and teen mothers? If you want that in your neighborhoods when everything not privately owned becomes Section 8 housing, go ahead.
 
Ohio AG says she didn't have to go to Indianna, they would've let her abort it in Ohio under the new law.


Her parents are retarded and didn't look it up.

Edit: lmao what fuckups
View attachment 3489760

So how long until it comes out the parents were forcing the child not to go to the police because they were not wanting to get the illegal immigrant in trouble for RAPING THEIR DAUGHTER. Because fuck their daughter's trauma (double so making her get an abortion and politicizing it), we can't be seen as being mean towards illegals!

So, how much are we likely to find out about this case given that there's a child involved? It doesn't explicitly say what the relationship was so it doesn't sound like incest, but the timing is fucked up and implies this isn't some random rape off the street either.


  • May 12, raped
  • 41 days later, mother contacts child services and they contact the cops? I think? Or is this just when they contacted the cops and they took over a month to tell the cops? Verbiage makes it sound like this is the day the mother did something though...
  • 20 days later, an arrest is made. Note that this is 2 months after the rape, so still being able to identify and locate the dude is interesting.
It could be that the mother waited so long to report it because she didn't know, but to know the exact date of the rape and to be able to track down the rapist so he can be arrested... She knows too much for her to not have known it happened.

Of course there's always the chance they fingered the wrong guy and are just throwing some beaner under the bus so they can go ffffffffuck you right wingers, he's real, give us our abortions. And then they silently exonerate him with DNA evidence when nobody is looking anymore because the MSM is great at publishing 6 pt retraction to 50 pt headlines. But they probably wouldn't use a minority if they were going to do that.

So, what happened? What is the relationship between these people, should the mother be deemed a risk to her child for holding off on making the report for do long?


Parents, plural? Do we know she has a dad?


Rape makes puberty go faster.
This is what I wrote in the other thread:
I still believe this story was used as an political rallying cry for the pro-abortionists. Here is the timeline as we now have facts to back up these dates:
  1. June 22nd -Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother. The child is under 6 weeks pregnant.
  2. June 24th- Roe v Wade struck down
  3. Same day mere hours later- Ohio's "Heart beat" law goes into effect
  4. June 27th - Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio has a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant
  5. June 30th - the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis at 6 week and 6 days pregnant
Why is there the 8 day delay? As stated in the thread the child would have meet the requirement for the exception after 6 weeks in the heart beat bill, instead we learn that the child could have gotten an abortion before 6 weeks.

Simple, people reacted with righteous fury at the harrowing tale of an 10 year old going out of state for an abortion since she just missed the cutoff period.
 
Torture children? TORTURE CHILDREN? The only one advocating for torturing children are the freaks advocating for babies to be ripped limb from limb!
If you and @Puff are too autistic to realize, I was talking about assholes in the other thread, not you, as I specifically stated. I don't remember you posting in that one, and I don't really care to read what you have to say after that huge 10 paragraph post about your masturbation in the Deep Thoughts forum I read earleir.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, let's stan for people that want to torture children. Put a gun in your mouth.
Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?
4210 Wolfetown Rd, Cherokee, NC 28719
Bring as many of your cowardly friends as you want; I'll go to prison, but all of you will go to the morgue.

I'm just saying maybe you're a bit too worked up about the opinion of a kiwifarmer.
 
Back