Crime (Update) Arrest Made in Rape of Ohio 10-Year-Old Who Had to Travel Out of State for Abortion

Link: https://www.thedailybeast.com/colum...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll
Archive: http://archive.md/2022.07.13-203034...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll


2BD82FDD-0F45-461E-A597-E6E5B37D2512.jpeg

An Ohio man was arrested Tuesday for raping a 10-year-old girl who became a central figure in the debate over abortion rights after she reportedly traveled to Indiana to have an abortion when Ohio outlawed the procedure last month.

Arrest records and court records viewed by The Daily Beast confirm that Gerson Fuentes, 27, was arrested Tuesday in Franklin County on a felony charge of raping a person under 13. The Columbus Dispatch, who first reported on his arrest, attended Fuentes’ arraignment in Columbus on Wednesday.

The unidentified girl’s plight became national news when the Indianapolis Star quoted a doctor who said a 10-year-old rape victim, who was six weeks and three days pregnant, had been forced to travel from her home in Columbus to Indiana for an abortion. Her home state had a trigger law that immediately outlawed abortions after six weeks once the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

A Columbus Police detective, identified by the Dispatch as Jeffrey Huhn, testified in court Wednesday that the 10-year-old victim was impregnated and had an abortion in Indianapolis.


“The victim went out of state to have a medically terminated abortion,” he said, according to video of the arraignment.

The video showed Fuentes staring blankly during the arraignment and standing with a slouch as a translator relayed the proceedings to him in Spanish.

Court records say the alleged rape occurred on May 12. Detectives said in court that police were made aware of the girl’s pregnancy through a referral filed with the local child services’ branch by her mother on June 22. Eight days later, the girl had the abortion in Indianapolis.

The aborted fetus has since been tested for DNA and entered into evidence, Huhn said, and officials say Fuentes confessed to the rape when he was questioned.

Fuentes’ arrest comes as conservative media claimed the girl’s story was made up for political theater, something parroted by Fox News presenters as recently as Tuesday night—while Fuentes was already in custody.

But those also with egg on their face in light of the horrific crime: the top law-enforcement official in Ohio.

Indeed, state Attorney General Dave Yost spent much of the past week effectively dubbing the story a hoax, suggesting he had heard nothing about any such crime being reported.

“We have a decentralized law enforcement system in Ohio, but we have regular contact with prosecutors and local police and sheriffs,” Yost said in a Fox News segment Monday. “Not a whisper anywhere.”


Yost released a statement Wednesday afternoon that did not address his previous comments.

“My heart aches for the pain suffered by this young child,” he said. “I am grateful for the diligent work of the Columbus Police Department in securing a confession and getting a rapist off the street.”

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, the Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist who first described the rape and its aftermath to the Indy Star, previously told The Daily Beast she expected vindication.

“It will all come out in time,” she said via text message on Tuesday.


Court records show Fuentes is being held on a bond of $2 million. The judge said he was considered a flight risk and, given the brutality of the crime, a high bail was necessary to protect the child involved.

—with reporting by Pilar Melendez
 
Last edited by a moderator:
depends on the state.


the doctor was doing her job. vilifying her for doing so is batshit retarded. blame the rapist, blame the mother, but the doctor was just doing her goddamn job.
Did you read the article? Going by the article, in Indiana she would have been required to call in a report as soon as possible and provide a written report within 24 to 48 hours. Ohio doesn't require the written report unless it's requested, but still requires a report ASAP. Her goddamn job, as you put it, was to report it ASAP, same as the doctor in Ohio, if they exist. If she did not, she's very likely about to get legally spitroasted by the Ohio and Indiana AGs, especially since she's had complaints about this very thing before.
 
We have skipped Clown World and entered Hell World. Telemundo tracked down the mother and she's claiming the rapist is innocent despite the fact the he apparently confessed to police.

View attachment 3492436
I wish I could find the study, but I wasn't the archivist I was back then and it probably got black holed. But there was a crime survey conducted in Southern California, and one part of it was how demographics behave differently. One of the memorable things is how Hispanics are likely to cover for each other, especially if it keeps the law away. But it's not like joggers and their no-snitching rule; these people can sexually predate and do other horrid shit, and their community is like "Well, that's how it is;" especially when it comes to illegals. The final part was it's hard to gauge how much crime Hispanics actually do, because they go hard on keeping outsiders (police) out.
 
Did you read the article? Going by the article, in Indiana she would have been required to call in a report as soon as possible and provide a written report within 24 to 48 hours. Ohio doesn't require the written report unless it's requested, but still requires a report ASAP. Her goddamn job, as you put it, was to report it ASAP, same as the doctor in Ohio, if they exist. If she did not, she's very likely about to get legally spitroasted by the Ohio and Indiana AGs, especially since she's had complaints about this very thing before.
what article are you reading? nigga, it doesn't even mention indiana (which is weird but whatever). i tried to do a cursory search for indiana mandatory reporter laws, and it does mention that ANY citizen of indiana is technically a mandated reporter. but what i haven't seen is a deadline to report. immediacy would be ideal, and is probably the case, but i've not seen anything mentioning it explicitly.
 
what article are you reading? nigga, it doesn't even mention indiana (which is weird but whatever). i tried to do a cursory search for indiana mandatory reporter laws, and it does mention that ANY citizen of indiana is technically a mandated reporter. but what i haven't seen is a deadline to report. immediacy would be ideal, and is probably the case, but i've not seen anything mentioning it explicitly.
Failing to report child abuse has serious consequences. In many states failing to report is considered a misdemeanor. In some states, it can even be upgraded to a felony. Because of this, mandated reporters need to know how long they have to report suspected abuse.

How long do I have to make the initial report?
Almost all states and U.S. territories require that mandated reporters report incidences of child abuse immediately or as soon as practically possible. A fast response time can make a huge difference for the child involved, making it imperative to respect this window of time.

Some states further clarify this time frame by setting a specific window. For example:

  • Connecticut: Your report must be made no more than 12 hours after cause to suspect.
  • Idaho, Nevada, Vermont, and the North Mariana Islands: You must report no later than 24 hours after reasonable suspicion.
  • Texas, Washington, West Virginia: Your report must be made no more than 48 hours after suspicion.
In Minnesota, suspected abuse at any point within the preceding three years must be reported immediately.

Many states require that this report be made via telephone hotline, but some, like Nevada and New York, allow electronic or other forms of report if it’s the fastest method. If you have reasonable suspicion of child abuse or neglect, contact the appropriate state authorities to report immediately.

How long do I have to submit a written report after my initial report?
18 states and several territories require a written report following an initial oral report. The window of time for this written report is usually between 24 and 48 hours.
The article lists the exceptions and then goes on to list the states with specific timeframes.

Or you could have just looked for Indiana specifically. Not hard to find, but the timing requirement is immediate.
 
what article are you reading? nigga, it doesn't even mention indiana (which is weird but whatever). i tried to do a cursory search for indiana mandatory reporter laws, and it does mention that ANY citizen of indiana is technically a mandated reporter. but what i haven't seen is a deadline to report. immediacy would be ideal, and is probably the case, but i've not seen anything mentioning it explicitly.
So, do you even know the history of the doctor you've been batting for? She has a fucking history of doing this shit.

Abortionist Caitlin Bernard Under Investigation by Indiana University and Attorney General of Indiana​

Link



This from the 2018 complaint:


Like out of all the things to try and sperg about it's the doctor.
Not the mom that might not even be the mom.
Jesus Christ you're bad at this.

Not even gonna mention the timeframe of the abortion -> interview -> report is most likely far longer than the longest timeframe for mandatory reporter laws. And then add the timeframe of diagnosis -> reporting to the media -> abortion. Which was ALSO the point of contention, by the way (that she reported it to the media BEFORE the authorities).
 
Last edited:
The article lists the exceptions and then goes on to list the states with specific timeframes.

Or you could have just looked for Indiana specifically. Not hard to find, but the timing requirement is immediate.
ctrl f and indiana isn't in the article i listed. but that's neither here nor there.

while your source says reports must be issued "immediately", apparently according to indiana's state departments of health and child services, the doctor was required to report the abortion within 3 days of it being performed, which she did. so my question is are you people upset she didn't report the abuse immediately even though she reported the abortion within the proper timeframe? like i'm struggling to grasp why people are hellbent on attacking this doctor for doing her job? is reporting a 10 year old's abortion not also effectively reporting abuse?

@derpherp2 pjmedia is a commentary website of right-wing politics, therefore it's biased. also calling the doctor an "abortionist" is pretty telling as far as biases go. please find a better source, friend.

edit: additionally, if these complaints were valid, how is she still a practicing doctor? surely she would have had her license removed if these complaints were as egregious as you seem to think they are.
 
Last edited:
ctrl f and indiana isn't in the article i listed. but that's neither here nor there.
Because it was only specifically listing exceptions or states with specific time frames. The Indiana specific link says immediately. Take the L.

while your source says reports must be issued "immediately", apparently according to indiana's state departments of health and child services, the doctor was required to report the abortion within 3 days of it being performed, which she did. so my question is are you people upset she didn't report the abuse immediately even though she reported the abortion within the proper timeframe? like i'm struggling to grasp why people are hellbent on attacking this doctor for doing her job? is reporting a 10 year old's abortion not also effectively reporting abuse?
It's not the abortion, it's the fact that a pregnant 10 year old is obviously abuse, which by Indiana state law, must be immediately reported. It was not and the abortion doctor you're busy simping for is very likely about to get legally fucked. And rightly so.
 
ctrl f and indiana isn't in the article i listed. but that's neither here nor there.

while your source says reports must be issued "immediately", apparently according to indiana's state departments of health and child services, the doctor was required to report the abortion within 3 days of it being performed, which she did. so my question is are you people upset she didn't report the abuse immediately even though she reported the abortion within the proper timeframe? like i'm struggling to grasp why people are hellbent on attacking this doctor for doing her job? is reporting a 10 year old's abortion not also effectively reporting abuse?

@derpherp2 pjmedia is a commentary website of right-wing politics, therefore it's biased. also calling the doctor an "abortionist" is pretty telling as far as biases go. please find a better source, friend.
Ah yes bias is totally going to change the part where she is under investigation for this shit. Or the parts where she failed to report similiar shit. already.

Got me there, faggot.
Do I need to source why you're a faggot btw? If so here -> (/https://kiwifarms.net/members/lurker.674/#recent-content)
 
Because it was only specifically listing exceptions or states with specific time frames. The Indiana specific link says immediately. Take the L.


It's not the abortion, it's the fact that a pregnant 10 year old is obviously abuse, which by Indiana state law, must be immediately reported. It was not and the abortion doctor you're busy simping for is very likely about to get legally fucked. And rightly so.
so let me try to understand this. the girl's abuse was reported in ohio, the state that she lives in, and because of ohio's restrictive abortion laws, she had to travel to indiana, where you're arguing ANOTHER child abuse report must be made despite it having been made in the state she actually resides in. i mean, i guess? technically i suppose that would be correct. it would seem redundant, but if that's what the state requires, then i guess she's super duper fucked and stuff.
 
so let me try to understand this. the girl's abuse was reported in ohio, the state that she lives in, and because of ohio's restrictive abortion laws, she had to travel to indiana, where you're arguing ANOTHER child abuse report must be made despite it having been made in the state she actually resides in. i mean, i guess? technically i suppose that would be correct. it would seem redundant, but if that's what the state requires, then i guess she's super duper fucked and stuff.
And was it reported in Ohio? By who?
Do you get what leading questions are or do I have to source that too?
You really should go back to calling people you disagree with boomers or pedophiles(cuz calling your buttbuddies pedos gets you assblasted for some reason?), it's much more fun than you vaguely sourcing shit via google to pretend you know what's happening.
 
so let me try to understand this. the girl's abuse was reported in ohio, the state that she lives in, and because of ohio's restrictive abortion laws, she had to travel to indiana,
The Ohio AG has said that's not the case, it would not have been illegal in Ohio. The doctor they went to in Indiana has multiple complaints for failure to report suspected abuse though, almost like they went to her for a reason.
where you're arguing ANOTHER child abuse report must be made despite it having been made in the state she actually resides in. i mean, i guess? technically i suppose that would be correct. it would seem redundant, but if that's what the state requires, then i guess she's super duper fucked and stuff.
Yes, Indiana state law mandates that the doctor must make an immediate report in cases of suspected child abuse. Pretty sure there's no "They're from out of state, so whatever," exception. They would have kicked it over to Ohio once they figured out the girl was from there. The Ohio doctor, assuming they exist, who pointed them at the Indiana doctor also would have been a mandatory reporter and thus is going to be in the same legal problems. It's not about the abortion, it's about failure to report obvious child sexual abuse.
 
And was it reported in Ohio? By who?
Do you get what leading questions are or do I have to source that too?
You really should go back to calling people you disagree with boomers or pedophiles(cuz calling your buttbuddies pedos gets you assblasted for some reason?), it's much more fun than you vaguely sourcing shit via google to pretend you know what's happening.

????????

edit: i'm specifically referring to @Dergint's timeline, or are you saying he's wrong, too?
 
Good you know it wasn't a doctor.
So, do you also understand what mandatory reporting child abuse post-abortion is?
Do I also need to remind you again what leading questions are?
the question you asked was whether abuse was reported in ohio. it was, by her mother.

you're not very good at this, friend.
 
depends on the state.


the doctor was doing her job. vilifying her for doing so is batshit retarded. blame the rapist, blame the mother, but the doctor was just doing her goddamn job.
According to RAINN, as of March 2020, she should have made the report immediately, so the same day she got the call from Ohio even if the girl doesn't come in. Or I guess the day that the girl came in, if she wants to do a thorough report with photographic evidence. No reason that can't be a followup though.

What part of her job description says she should make the case into a news story and give the rapist a chance to flee before she reports it to the cops?

Jews who hang a wire outside so they can walk around "without leaving their homes" have more integrity than this woman. Neither follow the spirit of the law but at least one the former is autistic about following the word of it.

I get you're trying to own the rightoids but you're not only late in trying to gotcha an entire fucking thread, your assumptions are so far from what people actually had an issue about it's funny.

Bait better, faggot.
I'm not so sure it's bait anymore, Lurker seems more desperate to exonerate the doctor than to make us mad.

Note the shift in tone from "shouldn't your indignant rage be directed at, I dunno, the man who raped the child?" to "blame the rapist, blame the mother, but the doctor was just doing her goddamn job."

The first is meant to be accusatory, and yes it looks like bait. I was shocked that their response to my "I'm mad at everyone here" was a dumb instead of a tophat.

But this note recent "[she] was doing her job", "[she] was doing her goddamn job"... It sounds more like someone's world is crashing down and they're trying to reassure themself that they know what they know. The plea to blame anyone but the doctor feels really weird and personal. Almost makes me suspect this is a personal acquaince of Bernard.

lol imagine expecting anyone to file a report on a friday. Faggot that is the end of the week it’s tequila time.
Lol seriously, Monday when she got the call or Thursday when she saw the girl in person would have made more sense than waiting until Saturday.

And was it reported in Ohio? By who?
Not to defend Lurker but the cops in Ohio did say they got the report from child services on the 22nd.
 

Attachments

Back