- Joined
- May 7, 2022
From the link:I think the difference is they have to be "legally competent" https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/right-represent-yourself-criminal-case.html?pathUI=button
I think it makes sense, can't really say someone got a fair trial if they clearly have no idea how to navigate the legal system and are a complete moron.
"
- the defendant's age
- the defendant's level of education
- the defendant's familiarity with English, and
- the seriousness of the crime with which the defendant is charged.
I think the seriousness of the charge and understanding court proceedings would possibly rule out Chris but it's up to the judge. If he just wanted to see his ship sink, he could declare him competent I suppose.
If one happens to be declared unable to defend themselves solely, can they do it with competent assistance? Such as, having a public defender act as an advisor but the defendant still directly defends themselves?