What is the American government? Literally an existential threat to the American people: Waco, Ruby Ridge, Bundy standoff, Sagebush Rebellion, Battle of Blair Mountain, Battle of Athens, Ranch Rescue, Ulvalde, etc...
You are all larping as confederates, or speaking as if you were Taliban inside your own country. And you didn't mention all the times Black people got screwed by the American government btw. If you want to change the American government, and you are American, then you can do it with you head and through politics. I fail to see how stockpiling assault weaponry is going to make the government less corrupt.
All national governments consider their "citizens" to be expendable when it suits them.
Lol, imagine being a pro-russian, pro-gun faggot, but anti Ukraine giving their people AK for defense against an actual invader. I admire that level of cognitive dissonance.
I never claimed to be for or against Russia or Ukraine. I do, however, recognize that both countries are run by corrupt oligarchs and associated shitheads.
The weapons (like the Javelin) were always meant for a war against Russia in the German forests. Blowing up Ruskie armor is what they were created for, and they are excelling.
There's nothing based about supporting the current thing just because the TV people tell you to support the current thing.
You're on the wrong thread, mate. Nobody here cares about Ukraine.
Nobody here goes around thinking "Which bitch do I cap today?", we want nothing but to be left alone in peace but it seems you don't understand that.
The way he's been acting in this thread, it kinda makes me think he wants to be the guy doing the killing fields. Like some kinda braindead commie larper not unlike Ahuviya Harel or ADF or whatever that dumbass's name is.
I don't know how normal people can do that. Maybe a desensitized first responder.
Propaganda's a hell of a drug. Just like cocaine.
hardly. it's an illusion that the government is doing something. the dems know it won't pass in the senate, but they know they can introduce it so their constituents can go "oh wow the dems are sure sticking it to those gun nuts!" while not actually having to do anything at all.
Implying this survives SCOTUS.
Legally, that's easier to defend. Lower courts (including the cucked 9th) have held that you must have SOME kind of carry under DC v Heller, and under the new historicity standard you could argue that this is in line with old brandishing laws. We'll have to see how it plays out and what arguments are made.
