Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Cuckstain is daring them to coop him so he can "fight" them: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1627944&oldid=1627943

What about a user like Castaigne2, who takes quite an aggressive stance? Should he banned as well? Aneris seems to clash with many editors because he has a minority viewpoint, not because he wants to do nothing else. And from what I've seen, he always explains his positions in detail. Lord Aeonian (talk) 00:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

He does need to be told off, but he isn't quite on the same level yet. And it hasn't been as long standing of a problem. If you want me to dig up a more compelling case, I can, but I sort of relied on the experience of others having dealt with him when I brought this up precisely because of how long standing this issue has been. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 00:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, please, coop me. I dare you. I relish a good fight when it's offered. --Castaigne2 (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Someone has decided to propose a month-long ban for Aneris which Adam eagerly supported. Aneris replies and explains how Adam and the rest of the Cohen Crew are harassing him by edit warring and gutting articles they don't like that Aneris has worked on, and now Adam is continuing this harassment by trying to silence him with a coop case and then crying victim. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1627963&oldid=1627958

Let me sum up. Virtually every edit, no matter how sourced was always reverted by your gang. They also destroyed articles and removed like a third of all sources. I pretty much always accepted that, since your gang is persistent. In particular your friend Ryulong is internet famous in that department, wasn't he? (just google Ryulong, everyone). There is usually no point in enganging in this. It's also unimportant in which direction it goes. When they want something in, they put it in. And revert every changes. If they don't want something in, they also revert. It doesn't matter. Only the Grand Narrative is important. Collaborative editing? Forget about that. Constructive dialogue, as touted on the frontpage? Where does that happen? This follows the same logic as what you present here: if you like the direction, it's good. If you don't, it's mean evil vandalism! These things are typical for a Right Wing Authoritarian mindset (don't confuse with political directions). A little bit of jootsing already screws up your bot program. Of course are you a harasser. How many of such edit wars have there been really? Aren't there at least two parties in such an edit war? In other words, quite literally the very moment I don't submit to your “ownership” you start your coop case harassment, together with more harassment that is certainly to follow as usual (we've been there before). How many sock puppets did you people create — like five? (this is also a fact, not polemitcal) And now that you see that your BS doesn't work out exactly as you would have liked, your smearing and poisoning the well: you claim victimhood — poor victimized me! Well, that's abusive. ~ Aneris ✻ 02:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Adam replies within minutes to jeer 'lol nou'.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1627964&oldid=1627963
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Randall Fragg, Francis York Morgan, fuehrer_dessler and 1 other person
upload_2016-2-14_19-29-57.png


I love it.

Also, what was passive aggressive about what Carpetsmoker said? Does Kitsu even know what that means or is that yet another buzzword for him?

[EDIT]
upload_2016-2-14_19-35-52.png


IGNORE ALL GOOGLE RESULTS
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Hellfire and chimpburgers
HipstrsGonnaHip said:
View attachment 73456

I love it.

Also, what was passive aggressive about what Carpetsmoker said? Does Kitsu even know what that means or is that yet another buzzword for him?

[EDIT]
View attachment 73457

IGNORE ALL GOOGLE RESULTS
Click to expand...
Redacting other user's talk page, coop or forum edits is totally forbidden on pretty much every wiki, this including. Why the fuck did no-one notice or revert it? Are they retarded???
 
  • Agree
Reactions: APerson
HipstrsGonnaHip said:
I like Carpetsmoker when he's riled up.
Click to expand...

Adam's ooking and eeking as he chimps out at Aneris and Carpetsmoker comes in swinging. Love it.

Adam spergs out about the Farms, with more lies as afaik we didn't do anything to his butt buddies on Twitter until sometime after he had protected the account and one of them said he would break our jaws with one punch like he was his anime hero: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628045&oldid=1628043

On your "It would have put myself and others at risk": A) That's disingenuous as shit to bring up because the incident we're talking about at that time was around the height where people were fucking trying to doxx me. More drama means more ammo means more risk means more, y'know, doxxing. They were also targeting anyone who was talking with me on twitter at the time, which forced me to make my account private. I'm talking about later. And you know that. The "Driving you off of the site" complaint is purley from the talk page shitfest, which was me trying to level with you. And yes, if I wanted you gone, at that point, I would have fucking cooped you. More to the point, I was increasingly frustrated with your passive aggression, your attempts to ignite some kind of flame war with me whenever you got the chance. Forgive me if my tongue got away from me, but you were, quite literally, trying to get just that kind of rise from me, because I had the gall to treat sensitive issues the way they needed to be treated in an incredibly fucking sensitive time. In that sense, it is rather ironic that you accuse me of trying to chase you off, when it appeared to quite literally be the other way around, and I was tired of it.

It is laughable that you insist I wasn't in any immediate danger by contributing to this wiki, because you yourself openly contributed to a thread in which was dedicated to the doxxing and harassment of Ryulong, and at the time in question (not when you were posting there, if you're keeping track), had turned it's attention to focus on me, because you'd done their job and driven him from the site. And before you give me that "I left because I don't like doxxing!" shit, the thread literally has Ryulong's fucking IRL name in it's god damn title and you didn't care. You looked at it and said "These seem like great people, I should mingle and try to get along with them!" I guess doxxing is okay if it's happening to Ryulong, eh? - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 04:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, fuehrer_dessler and AnOminous
As Adam screams and flails at him, Carpetsmoker has decided to dox himself.

this is me, as is this. Here is my living room (well, part of it anyway). here it is on a map (if you use streetview it's the top-right one−it's from before I actually lived there btw).

So, now I am "doxed". It was all public anyway for anyone who cared to search (whois anyone), but for some strange and inexplicable reason I have never been a target for such searches. I wonder why. Oh wait, I think maybe it's not being a lying asshole who stirs up shit every chance he gets, but merely being someone who wants to constructively contribute to the internet.

Oh, and "you'd done their job and driven him [Ryulong] from the site" is funny, because I'm pretty sure most Kiwis regret Ryulong's departure, as he was a consistent and high-level (or low-level, depending on your take) source of ridiculous drama. Carpetsmoker (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Adam continues to screech.

So your argument is "You aren't in any danger, doxxing is harmless, and if you get harassed through doxxing you deserve it because you're a lying asshole who stirs shit up every chance she gets"? Ho---leee---crap. And you're trying to imply I'm chickenshit for not having all my private information online by posting yours here. Holy fucking shit. Have you gone off of the deep end? - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

No, my argument is that it was ridiculous and lame for brining up doxing and playing the victim, as the discussion wasn't even touching on it. The world does not revolve about your alleged harassment. It was about you being a non-contributing person who only arrogantly complains about others in a vile and hateful manner, and somehow has the guts to arrogantly assert how this site "should be". Carpetsmoker (talk) 05:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

"Alleged harassment" oh gods are you saying doxxing isn't a form of harassment now or are you seriously insisting these people weren't trying to doxx me? also let me say something regarding your earlier post: google doesn't always remove doxx, and the fact that it's on google does not make it fucking okay. Christ on a pogostick. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Carpetsmoker wonders why Adam is sperging out about doxing still when he just doxed himself because he doesn't give a shit. Adam starts chimping and repeatedly edits his response. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628100&oldid=1628099

Why are we still talking about doxing? Why aren't we talking about you repeatedly lying? Why aren't we talking about that you make almost no meaningful contributions and seemingly only want to squash any dissent on a very narrow range of topics? This discussion isn't about doxing. Your attempts to play victim to win internet discussions may work for some, but not with me. Carpetsmoker (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Because you said some incredibly reprehensible things that nobody can really justify? And they're incredibly indicative of the kind of shit that makes me have a problem with you in the first place? And you're still insisting me saying people were trying to doxx me is false. And that I'm just doing this to gain VictimBux instead of trying to tackle YOUR issues with me by explaining what actually happened. Which is incredibly fucking offensive. HEAVEN FORBID I actually address you bitching about me talking with the mods behind yourback and give the reasons why it wasn't out in the open.- Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

At this point Tielec had made a "No" vote saying "Please stop Kitsunelaine" and Adam lashes out at him too, repeatedly editing to up his spaghetti spillage.

Please stop Kitsunelaine. Tielec01 (talk) 05:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Carpetsmoker has said some incredibly offensive things and you're telling me to stop? Where are your priorities? Do you WANT people to ignore this stuff? It won't make it go away. It'll remain there, forever festering in a pile of boiling gunge. Nobody wants that.- Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Adam realizes Tielec wasn't directly talking to him and removes his salt: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628104&oldid=1628103

Adam then starts lying and saying he isn't the problem and it's Carpetsmoker who "goes out of his way" to attack Adam: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628107&oldid=1628105

Adam then autism edits his comment to say he doesn't want to be browsing the site if Carpetsmoker is around, as if it's a huge loss to the RW community if the manchild named Adam Morland stops instigating shit there: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628109&oldid=1628107

Carpetsmoker laughs his ass off at the continuing lies: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628114&oldid=1628109

Adam snivels that Carpetsmoker is just a "disingenuous brat": http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628123&oldid=1628122

Holy shit this is great, @Dynastia where are you, get your popcorn there is plenty of salt to go around.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Randall Fragg, AnOminous, Francis York Morgan and 2 others
Hellfire said:
As Adam screams and flails at him, Carpetsmoker has decided to dox himself.



Adam continues to screech.



Carpetsmoker wonders why Adam is sperging out about doxing still when he just doxed himself because he doesn't give a shit. Adam starts chimping and repeatedly edits his response. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628100&oldid=1628099



At this point Tielec had made a "No" vote saying "Please stop Kitsunelaine" and Adam lashes out at him too, repeatedly editing to up his spaghetti spillage.



Adam realizes Tielec wasn't directly talking to him and removes his salt: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628104&oldid=1628103

Adam then starts lying and saying he isn't the problem and it's Carpetsmoker who "goes out of his way" to attack Adam: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628107&oldid=1628105

Adam then autism edits his comment to say he doesn't want to be browsing the site if Carpetsmoker is around, as if it's a huge loss to the RW community if the manchild named Adam Morland stops instigating shit there: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628109&oldid=1628107

Carpetsmoker laughs his ass off at the continuing lies: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628114&oldid=1628109

Adam snivels that Carpetsmoker is just a "disingenuous brat": http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628123&oldid=1628122

Holy shit this is great, @Dynastia where are you, get your popcorn there is plenty of salt to go around.
Click to expand...

Holy fuck, the Stupid Fox Mutt trying to out-sperg the Idiot Serpent? He's got a long way to go, but he's well on his way, I can see that clearly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hellfire
Dynastia said:
Somebody just cooped Kitsulaine.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1628259&oldid=1628238

Prepare yourselves.
Click to expand...
Typhoon acts dumb here.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=next&oldid=1628259

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=1628264

Adamu / Bitchunelaine shows up again to sperg and edits the fuck out of his comment for several edits:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=1628271

More shit from this loser:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=next&oldid=1628281

Carpetsmoker tries to save the day:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=next&oldid=1628295

Bitchunelaine again:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=next&oldid=1628296

It's just so much.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Splendid, Hellfire, fuehrer_dessler and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back