This scenario has always been one that I love to picture happening, but I just don't see how it would ever come about and I've had to mostly relegate it to wishful thinking. He doesn't engage with anybody in any forum where he isn't just able to block them out. His response to every criticism is to stretch it to the point of absurdity and then say, 'What an idiot, get tf out of here' and ban them. The closest you'd ever get to this is something like the bankruptcy hearing where he knew he'd potentially have to account for all the shit he lies about not adding up, and he got treated with relative kid gloves.
Think about how he acted though, even in a scenario where he was barely pressed on things. He was giving ridiculous rambling responses where he was trying to describe things like PayPal in really specific semantic ways like how he usually plays with language when he's being slimy about something. That little preview of how poorly he was able to handle himself when barely being called to account made me realize what kind of a meltdown he'd have if someone (especially in a position of authority) actually played his language game back at him and picked apart the semantic bullshit that seems to be his only tool when trying to deflect. It'd be glorious to see him stammering and mush mouthed, unable to just call the person stupid and ban them, but he'd only ever be in that scenario if some circumstance forced him to, never willingly. As much as he likes to posture about his principles and his 'rightness' in his holier than thou, absolute black and white terms, he's a moral jellyfish who has zero courage or belief behind his convictions.
