There is some interesting commentary here, and some other commentary I think is whack.
I still think what Gene has done since the end of Episode 11 is out of character. It also seems so out of character for him to let the mask down so far with Marion, tipping his hand re knowledge regarding the differences in the bond system in Albuquerque and Nebraska.
Jeff driving full blast into a park car really pulls things out of character and I am no longer buying the actor switch they did.
I appreciate this thread because reddit, as reddit is apt to do, is going off the rails with the virtue signaling, how Better Call Saul fans are not nearly as 'breaking" bad fans, even bringing up "Skyler can do not wrong" because misogyny is evil karma harvesting posts (see attachments) I am hoping that is not a fair sample of the Better Call Saul audience, but to the extent it is, people are really buying into the moral fagging that Vince Gilligan and the writers are dishing out. He even said in the podcast that the subtext derives from the "catholic guilt" of his upbringing, something that has been the nexus of a lot of self-destructive behavior.
Of course it is traumatic for a ranking member of the Mexican drug cartel to "teleport" into one's home, murdering a former colleague, someone you know well in cold blood. I just do not see the foreseeability or causation in play with Howard's murder by *LALO* (not Kim or Jimmy) for Kim to rationally take such blame morally upon herself, and in the process destroy herself and effectively abandon the man she professed to have loved.
We will see how it ends, but the last episode has left me unimpressed. I think VInce Gilligan wants to "make an example" ouf Kim and Jimmy, in a way he wanted to with Walter White but dared not do, as he has talked about characters "getting what they deserve." In other words, six or seven years of following this show have been reduced to a crude morality play.