- Joined
- Sep 30, 2018
This is true and I agree that motorcycles should be promoted as an alternative to cars, but they're also incredibly unsafe. They travel at the speed of a car while only offering the protection of a bicycle. A lot of people would be willing to swap their car for a bicycle or a train ticket but considerably less would be willing to accept the massively increased risks that come with riding a motorcycle.Very often you can shoot down their arguments by vouching for motorcycles for personal transport. they cause less congestion, get the best fuel mileage out of motorised transport, they can filter through traffic in most states, and you can park something like 10 motorcycles in the space of 5 cars. But they do not want to acknowledge this.
Yes they do? Mobility scooters were originally designed with them in mind. Also, many elderly people are not fit to drive for various reasons, and are in fact one of the groups who are most disenfranchised and isolated by car-centrism.None of them consider the elderly either when going on an anti car rampage
Nobody except a tiny radical minority are calling for car ownership to be banned completely. Most people just think it would be nice to have more options other than driving, something that isn't true in many places in Canada and the US right now. In rural areas needing a car is understandable, but the fact that there are cities where a car is a necessity should be considered ludicrous. Why is having more choice in transportation a bad thing?or the fact that up to 5 people travelling to a destination benefit a car, or workers needing to haul tools to a site, or insulation from bad weather etc etc the car and mass transportation revolutionised the world and theyre seething about it