Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
Because they have a unicorns and rainbows mentality that everything will be fine if we let unarmed social workers handle a hostile, violent situation, because they can handle it without guns. Heck, there was an article about how just because there are no cops in Steven Universe and the She-Ra reboot, we don't need them either. The ones that aren't con-artists are naive idiots who think the mentioned social workers should only chase criminals in helicopters so they don't cause traffic problems. (Interestingly, one could put the fools and con-artists categories in with socialism as well.)
Click to expand...
I bet they take pointers from Naruto, too.

"Talk no Jutsu", anyone? I cannot tell you how malignantly retarded that outlook is and just how many of the "fans" fall back on that. It's one of the top memes for a reason. Probably because of how the crime culture in Japan is, and because Kishimoto must have thought he was being feel good "profound" in his writing.

Also, pursuing criminals in helicopters? Are they living in an action movie? Do they think some Sylvester Stallone or Vin Diesel type is gonna go gung-ho and swing down from on high like a badass? I thought they hated that shit? Fuck me, no wonder these morons failed in autonomous zones.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Doctor Hobo, The Curmudgeon, Aunt Carol and 5 others
21ECC3BE-FE83-4034-86C4-C4F6FC66D76D.jpeg
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Clotso Coof, KokoroKoroki, Doctor Hobo and 23 others
notafederalagent said:
View attachment 3597677
View attachment 3597663
https://twitter.com/lizar_tistry/status/1551316900638248960 (archive.ph)
Click to expand...

I have issues with mandated reporting, we have something similar in the UK. In can do more harm than good, for example if a family knows seeking help (eg from charities) will result in a report to social services that may make their situation worse, they may avoid seeking help altogether. Quite often, social services can't actually do anything if there is no proof or the victim denies, but the knowledge that there's been a report could make life 10X worse for the victim. The paranoia could cause their abusers to close off their access to the outside world, or accuse the victim of making the report.

However this graphic is plainly written by groomers. It's overly focused on children, when a lot of social services reports involves abuse of adults, or situations of self-neglect or incapability where a person cannot take care of themselves. The notion that 80-90% of reports are unsubstantiated has the same energy as perverts saying that most rape accusations are false, when really they are just hard to prove in court.

And then there's the typical tranny/SJW forced teaming tactic of tying everything to race in order to grow support. In the hope that anyone who wants to Kill Whitey will see this and get on board their groomer agenda to destroy all protections for children.
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Doctor Hobo, M4RTIANT1TAN, chickenbutt and 8 others
Slap47 said:
View attachment 3596349
View attachment 3596350

Do not say the word "Trap" please, it obviously refers to us lumpy balding people.
Click to expand...

>"I understand the context of the post but "trap" is a bannable slur"

If you understand the context, then why are you banning them? Banning someone for using a term in demonstrative contexts makes it impossible to discuss issues surrounding the term, and makes you look like a power-tripping asshole of a moderator. Reducing every naughty word in the language to "The Letter Word" (i.e. "The n-word, the t-slur, etc.") just makes it impossible for others to understand what the hell you're even talking about.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™, chickenbutt, madethistocomment and 14 others
ToroidalBoat said:
Another woke grift tactic: elimination of differences being called "inclusive" or similar BS. Like the attempt to eliminate "gender" differences being called BS like that.

People don't have to be the same to get along. Looks like the woke cult is projecting again.
Click to expand...
They can't make up their minds.

On one hand, they insist we're all different and will never have any common ground. They demand separate spaces for different peoples. They're against any form of cultural diffusion lest it becomes the dreaded "cultural appropriation." They insist on tribalism and ethnic nationalism. For example: We MUST see color!

On the other hand, they demand inclusivity, representation, and equity. They want people to live together but only in the context of their so-called progressive stack which is akin to a caste system. Like you said, they want to eliminate differences, yet only for cynical reasons. As in, they want grant privileges to favored groups by reducing or eliminating standards altogether.

I'm sure there are better examples, but that's the gist of it.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Somerandoontheweb, Coal Burner Account, Dracula's Spirit Animal and 14 others
The Curmudgeon said:
They can't make up their minds.

On one hand, they insist we're all different and will never have any common ground. They demand separate spaces for different peoples. They're against any form of cultural diffusion lest it becomes the dreaded "cultural appropriation." They insist on tribalism and ethnic nationalism. For example: We MUST see color!

On the other hand, they demand inclusivity, representation, and equity. They want people to live together but only in the context of their so-called progressive stack which is akin to a caste system. Like you said, they want to eliminate differences, yet only for cynical reasons. As in, they want grant privileges to favored groups by reducing or eliminating standards altogether.

I'm sure there are better examples, but that's the gist of it.
Click to expand...
Schrodinger's skin color?
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Coal Burner Account, TerribleIdeas™, chickenbutt and 10 others
Book Thief said:
>"I understand the context of the post but "trap" is a bannable slur"

If you understand the context, then why are you banning them? Banning someone for using a term in demonstrative contexts makes it impossible to discuss issues surrounding the term, and makes you look like a power-tripping asshole of a moderator. Reducing every naughty word in the language to "The Letter Word" (i.e. "The n-word, the t-slur, etc.") just makes it impossible for others to understand what the hell you're even talking about.
Click to expand...
What the hell is "trap" supposed to mean?
 
The Curmudgeon said:
They can't make up their minds.

On one hand, they insist we're all different and will never have any common ground. They demand separate spaces for different peoples. They're against any form of cultural diffusion lest it becomes the dreaded "cultural appropriation." They insist on tribalism and ethnic nationalism. For example: We MUST see color!

On the other hand, they demand inclusivity, representation, and equity. They want people to live together but only in the context of their so-called progressive stack which is akin to a caste system. Like you said, they want to eliminate differences, yet only for cynical reasons. As in, they want grant privileges to favored groups by reducing or eliminating standards altogether.

I'm sure there are better examples, but that's the gist of it.
Click to expand...
Don't forget how they want to unite the POCs and their white "allies" against their boogeyman, whitey. Just like good little soldiers. Or their little mind games where they will heap all this guilt and accusations on whites, then turn around and tell them not to feel any negative emotions about it. They say there's nothing wrong with having white skin, yet still claim whiteness as evil.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Hobo, Coal Burner Account, TerribleIdeas™ and 16 others
The Last Stand said:
What the hell is "trap" supposed to mean?
Click to expand...
Term that refers to men that pass as women that originates from Japanese gay-anime subcultures.

Transpeople in the west assert that this is a slur that represents them as gays that want to trick straight men. However, the point of the trap is often that they still identify as men and are not even trying appear as a woman.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Hobo, The Lawgiver, TerribleIdeas™ and 8 others
Chandelier said:
If you don't see race, you're a white supremacist.
If you do, you're also a white supremacist.





View attachment 3601377
View attachment 3601378
Click to expand...
Yeah, it’s not really helping your case when you subtly admit that you want J.K. Rowling to get the same type of treatment that a well known author and academic did years after receiving a fatwa to his name.

Thankfully, people in the comments section are calling out this kind of hypocrisy, because we all know they would never be bold enough to do this in real life.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Doctor Hobo, TerribleIdeas™, chickenbutt and 8 others
The Curmudgeon said:
They can't make up their minds.
Click to expand...
Cultural diffusion, races getting along without identity politics, differences between the sexes are examples of what they want out.

I guess the cult really wants people to stop being people. In other words - wokeism really is a "toxic" and anti-human "ideology"...
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Doctor Hobo, Coal Burner Account, TerribleIdeas™ and 10 others
The Last Stand said:
What the hell is "trap" supposed to mean?
Click to expand...
Crossdressers that actually pass, primarily those in anime. They aren't trans, they're just fabulous femboys.

The term itself comes from an old 4chan gag involving Bridget, where posters would be tricked into saying how they wanted to bang the “cute monk girl” before that one Admiral Ackbar image was deployed in response. The fact of the matter was that Bridget openly asserts that he was a guy whenever he was hit on, and turning him into a tranny because troons feel threatened when Gender nonconforming characters exist was incredibly insulting to the history of the character.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Doctor Hobo, TerribleIdeas™, chickenbutt and 8 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back