Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Of course ISWV Fails isn't going to let it go anytime soon because that's really the only thing she has going for her. I mean her five minutes of fame are up now that the lawsuit is over and in a month from now everyone is going to forget about this and move on to other things unless any more drama comes up later on.

So the way I see it, ISWV Fails is going to end up becoming a discount Brianna Wu if she thinks she can keep up her Twitter gimmick account grift forever. If in a month we still see that ISWV Fails still bitches about Vic then we'll just mock her the same way people mock the Leftoids that can't move on from #Gamergate anyway.
 
We should start keeping a tally board of all the KV speds who come into the thread just to gloat about their very hollow victory over a technicality.

Imagine gloating like an arrogant, mustache twirling villain not because you proved your point, but because the other side was disqualified because of a mistake.

That's like winning a cooking competition because your opponent just forgot to use the theme ingredient and not because you made the better dish.
 
I assume not. The court said it was proper to not consider anything from the second amended petition, while also saying the depositions, Erica McCord's declaration, and Stan's affidavit were properly in the record. Ergo, it wasn't in the second amended petition.

Page 13
View attachment 3629487

Your bringing up the whole "I would remember it" = speculation thing makes me wonder. This opinion reads a lot different from the other TCPA opinions that we've looked at while waiting for this one. It just feels different if that makes sense.

I can only assume the court was so annoyed with Ty's bumbling and the general mountain of shit in the record they kind of just stopped caring.
Damn…Ty really fucked up huh?
 
We should start keeping a tally board of all the KV speds who come into the thread just to gloat about their very hollow victory over a technicality.
I mean yes, but also no.

As I've learned watching other trials that Nick has covered, rules are rules, and those rules need to be followed. Bill Cosby, who looks guilty as fuck, was released on a "technicality," but said technicality was lying to him and violating his constitutional rights.

Those rules need to be followed. Imagine if the Mountain Jew or Greer or whoever was allowed to break the rules to continue their lawsuit. That wouldn't be proper. It doesn't become proper just because a guy who got fucked over by metoo is doing it (through his lawyer).

Damn…Ty really fucked up huh?
That's pretty much what it looks like.

Vid did kind of shoot himself in the foot when he was a little too ambiguous and charitable in his deposition (like when he admitted to touching Marchi's hair), but his affidavit where he firmly denies her story should have cured that.

Vic shot himself in the foot, but Ty's fuckup took a baseball bat to both his kneecaps.
 
Nah, tally away.

Just commenting on the "technicality" rhetoric.
I'm not saying the technicality itself is bad. A win is a win no matter how scuffed and how much it aggravates me.

What I am saying is bad is them treating the technicality as if it's some gotcha that proves all the lies they'd said about him since day one and gloating as if they earned it, which they didn't. If they were able to have a total victory over him by proving in that TCPA that they did no damage to him whatsoever, that would be a different story. But they didn't and they won only because mistakes were made on Vic's side.

So to me, their victory is hollow. It was handed to them because their opponents happened to be a tad more incompetent. I concede to them about calling Ty out on ultimately fucking Vic's asshole, but no more than that.

They haven't proven anything about Vic being some serial rapist, only that his lawyers make dumb mistakes.

Imagine we're playing a friendly game of bandmitten and you hit the birdie and it goes out of bounds and they automatically award me the victory, not because I scored more points or was better, but because you messed up a bit too much. Then I proceeded to go around and tell everyone that I soundly beat you and that you're awful at bandmitten when that wasn't/isn't the case. Sure, you'd concede that you lost, but that would be pretty annoying having some jackass go around badmouthing you about it, wouldn't it? Especially because you messed up and not because you were lousier at the game.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying the technicality itself is bad. A win is a win no matter how scuffed and how much it aggravates me.
I think aggravating is the best word for this.

If Gay Pants Man had gone to trial and the jury had inexplicably found Marmot Toye, Whale Rial and Bitch Marchi more trustworthy than Vic, well, them's the breaks, but at least he got to tell his story.

If all Is had been dotted and Ts crossed, but it still failed TCPA, well, maybe his case wasn't as strong as we thought it was, and the TCPA is way too hard to satisfy.

But this timeline, where Vic had a very real chance to get to trial, but for Ty's fuckup, is aggravating.
 
Real shame about the appeals decision. Granted, winning the appeals was a tall order to begin in, but still, to think it was Ty, not Chupp, who fucked up the case. Sigh.

Damn…Ty really fucked up huh?
I'm really sorry you had to hear this news.
 
Real shame about the appeals decision. Granted, winning the appeals was a tall order to begin in, but still, to think it was Ty, not Chupp, who fucked up the case. Sigh.


I'm really sorry you had to hear this news.
Once the 2nd amended petition couldn't come in Ty's fuck up doomed the case. Vic's only win was the fees getting lowered and now that's undone. Now he's 500k+ in the hole due to some fat larping faggot of a lawyer. I hope he slaps Ty with a malpractice lawsuit. Don't think Anime Matsuri are gonna be reaching out to Nick to come next year. :story:
 
b8918d831f2b9059219992f15fda6705.pnga8b7297ceab9d0da554fcc9dcc6dcca0.png09bce447bfe62f102f18f3602fba810c.png56ae5fd5c2e5ee9a526f1e9d1c3e2f2d.png8f36efbf000c1a0f18e8f71f59904d54.png
 
Honestly, it's the US legal system that seems to be at fault here.
If calling a man a sexual predator almost 500 times in a few month on twitter is not malicious defamation, what is?

I don't consider this to be Ty's fuck up, Ty's mistakes were irrelevant ones.
Chupp and the CoA failed to consider justice over paperwork, which is what juges are expected to do.

I don't think this will go to the Supreme Court, but I clearly would like it to, that'd be quite entertaining.
 
Last edited:
Once the 2nd amended petition couldn't come in Ty's fuck up doomed the case. Vic's only win was the fees getting lowered and now that's undone. Now he's 500k+ in the hole due to some fat larping faggot of a lawyer. I hope he slaps Ty with a malpractice lawsuit. Don't think Anime Matsuri are gonna be reaching out to Nick to come next year. :story:
Why would they not reach out to Nick?
 
Real shame about the appeals decision. Granted, winning the appeals was a tall order to begin in, but still, to think it was Ty, not Chupp, who fucked up the case. Sigh.


I'm really sorry you had to hear this news.
I want him to Where that fucking shirt next time he's on Nicks show. that dumb ass
 
Honestly, it's the US legal system that seems to be at fault here.
If calling a man a sexual predator almost 500 times in a few month on twitter is not malicious defamation, what is?

I don't consider this to be Ty's fuck up, Ty's mistakes were irrelevant ones.
Chupp and the CoA failed to consider justice over paperwork, which is what juges are expected to do.

I don't think this will go to the Supreme Court, but I clearly would like to, that'd be quite entertaining.
The appeals court made it pretty clear it was the shitty legal representation that caused the failure of the case. Its Ty Beards fuck up.
 
The appeals court made it pretty clear it was the shitty legal representation that caused the failure of the case. Its Ty Beards fuck up.

Circular logic.
The juges can't be at fault because the juges said someone else is at fault... is basically what you said here.
I'm gonna assume you're just tired or something.
 
Last edited:
Circular logic.
The juges can't be at fault because the juges said someone else is at fault... is basically what you said here.
I'm gonna assume you're just tired or something.
That's literally how the courts run. They make rulings, and the ruling was that critical evidence was not properly put in the record because Ty fucked up.

No evidence, no case.
 
Ass clapper is right.

As annoying as it is, Ty failed to prove there was enough of a case and the appeals courts called him out on it. They noted that he would have had something going had he properly admitted the correct evidence, but he flubbed it and rules are rules.

It really sucks but that's why the court system has these proceedures in place. You have to follow them and if you mess up, that's on you.
 
Back