Community Tard Baby General (includes brain dead kids) - Fundies and their genetic Fuckups; Parents of corpses in denial

Android, I'm going to respectfully disagree. Many forms of autism are related to the X chromosome (Fragile X syndrome being one of the best-known) and even if a girl is affected, it's going to be much less severe than in a boy.
Eh, that might be true to an extent, but if there are more autistic males than females I think the ratio is still much closer to equal that traditionally thought.

It's hard to know exactly how common it is in females because so many autistic girls and women miss diagnosis. Shit is better than it used to be but there's still a long way to go.

Related tinfoil, I think some Karens cling so hard to vaccines causing autism as a cope because they don't want to consider the possibility that they or their kids father might be autistic.
 
They haven't seen Polio, or Diptheria (sp) sicken and kill children. Those things never existed in their world because, VACCINES!
They are too exceptional to realize this logic.
Not to mention being vaccinated helps protect those that cannot (for genuine reasons) be vaccinated or are immunosuppressed and are at risk.

They’d rather be selfish cunts because they read some nonsense on the internet.

SSPE anyone? I’m sure they’d love to lose a kid to this. Their very own, preventible, potato.
 
These "crunchy" anti-vax parents are from a generation who never experienced these diseases that we almost eradicated through vaccines.

They haven't seen Polio, or Diptheria (sp) sicken and kill children. Those things never existed in their world because, VACCINES!
They are too exceptional to realize this logic.
For thousands of years parents knew the terror of a infant or child’s fever spiking and knowing death was looming. Almost every family knew the trauma of losing children, or even parents, to contagious diseases. Even the hope a vaccine could prevent these diseases had ppl lining up for blocks to get them.

It’s amazing that all the loss and suffering endured by families for generations can be discarded once the “living memory” of it is gone.
 
Not to mention being vaccinated helps protect those that cannot (for genuine reasons) be vaccinated or are immunosuppressed and are at risk.

They’d rather be selfish cunts because they read some nonsense on the internet.

SSPE anyone? I’m sure they’d love to lose a kid to this. Their very own, preventible, potato.
There's an American woman on another website I go to who did. Her daughter got measles when there was a local outbreak in her area (IIRC California in the 1980s) before she was old enough to be vaccinated, and at first they thought her aberrant behavior was teenage hormones, but nope, SSPE, and she was basically a teenager with Alzheimer's for the next few years until her inevitable death. A one in a million tragedy that was completely preventable.

And her daughter was old enough to know what was happening to her.
 
It's interesting how banning abortion, be it under a Catholic state like Ireland or a Communist one like Romania, leads to shit like that.

In the Dominican Republic it's completely banned to the point where if your daughter is dying of cancer she can't be treated because radiation might affect the fetus. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/mom-abortion-ban-daughter-death-dominican-republic-rcna43600

In South Carolina they're proposing a total ban and they rank dead last on post neonatal care. With the Kansas vote they're having a public hearing on it.

I expect foster care shelters will be stuffed full of unwanted kids, or we'll see dead moms of cancer who'd otherwise live.
That makes no sense. The mother's would die anyway. They'd have to, in order to get the infants born. The mother's would l
I know abortions are increasingly rare after the 10 or so week mark, but I wonder if there's a slight spike in numbers around the 20 week mark specifically due to that being when a shitton of FUBAR fetal anomalies are diagnosed?

I remember a while back prolifers were screeching about an experiment where scalp tissue from fetuses aborted around 20 weeks were grafted onto rats. They were clutching pearls going on about how said fetuses totally would've survived as premies and shit even though I strongly suspect given the gestational age, that at least some of the donated fetuses were aborted/donated after getting devastating news at the 20 week scan.

This is precisely why some countries allow legal abortions from 20-24 week, after the 20 week FAS (Foetal abnormality scan). Lots of god awful stuff isn't detectable until then.

It's very easy for people to think they know what they'd do in that spot but until you, god forbid, go through it, it's hard to know for sure.
 
Everyone who eats food has died.
Vindicated +1000, from beyond the grave.


GAVIN-jumbo.jpg
 
If the word “abortion” or “pregnancy” is anywhere in the legislation and it’s supported by the pro-life faction, the whole point of it is to chip away at legalized abortion. They realized just a blanket reversal of Roe v Wade was unlikely so instead they try to dismantle it bit by bit in state legislatures via shit like this.
Fast forward five years and Roe vs Wade has been reversed. What a sad state of affairs in this day and age.
 
Not necessarily a tard baby (well, sort of) but something someone said like 100 pages ago stuck out to me, about how historical books tend to talk about potentially disabled people from long ago.

So after Alexander the Great died there was a huge hubub over who would be the next king and inherit the empire, and after a lot of drama between the army and the generals (which involved an attempted coup and the near lynching of a senior officer) they decided to form a regency and have two kings on the throne- Alexander's baby son, and his adult half-brother Philip, who was retarded. That is literally the term that history book use, right up to the 2010s. The kinder ones will say that he was 'mentally deficient' or osme variant thereof, but most will just straight up call him a tard or a moron. Classics/histpry books have a very long shelf-life and it's not unusual to use books that are 40-50 years old, so outdated terminology is normal.

Anyway I'm quite fascinated by poor 'tarded Philip. While he was king he was basically surrounded by wranglers at all times the foremost of which was his extremely intelligent and forceful wife Eurydice (who was also his niece). He was apparently normal-looking and prone to emotional meltdowns, so he was probably autistic. It's quite amazing that he was able to make it to adulthood, althoughy I suppose his brother never really considered him a threat. When Alexander died there was initially no suggestion of making Philip king, but after the army started making a fuss they relented. The Macedonians wanted a member of the royal family on the throne regardless of who it was (as long as it wasn't a woman). I wish we knew more about his life, but ancient authors barely talk about him and modern authors tend to dismiss him on account of his retardation. It's a shame though, I feel like the fact that he was allowed to live and even held a certain status tells us a lot about how ancient peoples treated their disabled family members. The Macedonian royals were always murdering one another so the fact that Philip lived to adulthood is very interesting. He was apparently competant enough to be told what to say and address the army under the watch of his wranglers, but he was incapable of making any proper decisions.

He was eventually tortured and murdered by his stepmother Olympias, and tbh I feel quite sad when I think about it because he seems to have been an innocent tard who wasn't doing anyone any harm, and he was forced into a dangerous position by the people around him.
 
Several years ago, there was a lot of press about a young man with autism who became a Rhodes Scholar, and he was going to be the first Rhodes Scholar to be accompanied by a service animal, and also his mother, a non-practicing physician who took care of him.

That man had a lot more wrong with him than just autism; among other things, he also wore leg braces and wore a backpack attached to a feeding tube pump, because of an unnamed other disorder he had (I suspect Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, which can often also present with autism-like symptoms).
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The-Mad-Asshatter
Not necessarily a tard baby (well, sort of) but something someone said like 100 pages ago stuck out to me, about how historical books tend to talk about potentially disabled people from long ago.

So after Alexander the Great died there was a huge hubub over who would be the next king and inherit the empire, and after a lot of drama between the army and the generals (which involved an attempted coup and the near lynching of a senior officer) they decided to form a regency and have two kings on the throne- Alexander's baby son, and his adult half-brother Philip, who was retarded. That is literally the term that history book use, right up to the 2010s. The kinder ones will say that he was 'mentally deficient' or osme variant thereof, but most will just straight up call him a tard or a moron. Classics/histpry books have a very long shelf-life and it's not unusual to use books that are 40-50 years old, so outdated terminology is normal.

Anyway I'm quite fascinated by poor 'tarded Philip. While he was king he was basically surrounded by wranglers at all times the foremost of which was his extremely intelligent and forceful wife Eurydice (who was also his niece). He was apparently normal-looking and prone to emotional meltdowns, so he was probably autistic. It's quite amazing that he was able to make it to adulthood, althoughy I suppose his brother never really considered him a threat. When Alexander died there was initially no suggestion of making Philip king, but after the army started making a fuss they relented. The Macedonians wanted a member of the royal family on the throne regardless of who it was (as long as it wasn't a woman). I wish we knew more about his life, but ancient authors barely talk about him and modern authors tend to dismiss him on account of his retardation. It's a shame though, I feel like the fact that he was allowed to live and even held a certain status tells us a lot about how ancient peoples treated their disabled family members. The Macedonian royals were always murdering one another so the fact that Philip lived to adulthood is very interesting. He was apparently competant enough to be told what to say and address the army under the watch of his wranglers, but he was incapable of making any proper decisions.

He was eventually tortured and murdered by his stepmother Olympias, and tbh I feel quite sad when I think about it because he seems to have been an innocent tard who wasn't doing anyone any harm, and he was forced into a dangerous position by the people around him.
Philip was a very useful pawn for his wife, her family, and others which is why he survived as long as he did.

Same thing when a infant or child inherits a throne, a regent with the political power gets to runs things for a decade. Dynasties are littered with literal useful idiots or children used as puppets by competing factions within the nobility.

Charles II of Spain (the bewitched king who was just a retarded man) is good reading for how useful idiot kings play out. Emperor Claudius is a great example of someone who pretended to be a useful idiot (he had a stutter and club foot) to get power but once he had it he proved to be a rather cunning mofo.
 
Not necessarily a tard baby (well, sort of) but something someone said like 100 pages ago stuck out to me, about how historical books tend to talk about potentially disabled people from long ago.

So after Alexander the Great died there was a huge hubub over who would be the next king and inherit the empire, and after a lot of drama between the army and the generals (which involved an attempted coup and the near lynching of a senior officer) they decided to form a regency and have two kings on the throne- Alexander's baby son, and his adult half-brother Philip, who was retarded. That is literally the term that history book use, right up to the 2010s. The kinder ones will say that he was 'mentally deficient' or osme variant thereof, but most will just straight up call him a tard or a moron. Classics/histpry books have a very long shelf-life and it's not unusual to use books that are 40-50 years old, so outdated terminology is normal.

Anyway I'm quite fascinated by poor 'tarded Philip. While he was king he was basically surrounded by wranglers at all times the foremost of which was his extremely intelligent and forceful wife Eurydice (who was also his niece). He was apparently normal-looking and prone to emotional meltdowns, so he was probably autistic. It's quite amazing that he was able to make it to adulthood, althoughy I suppose his brother never really considered him a threat. When Alexander died there was initially no suggestion of making Philip king, but after the army started making a fuss they relented. The Macedonians wanted a member of the royal family on the throne regardless of who it was (as long as it wasn't a woman). I wish we knew more about his life, but ancient authors barely talk about him and modern authors tend to dismiss him on account of his retardation. It's a shame though, I feel like the fact that he was allowed to live and even held a certain status tells us a lot about how ancient peoples treated their disabled family members. The Macedonian royals were always murdering one another so the fact that Philip lived to adulthood is very interesting. He was apparently competant enough to be told what to say and address the army under the watch of his wranglers, but he was incapable of making any proper decisions.

He was eventually tortured and murdered by his stepmother Olympias, and tbh I feel quite sad when I think about it because he seems to have been an innocent tard who wasn't doing anyone any harm, and he was forced into a dangerous position by the people around him.
Thank you for that info!
I'm assuming his mental issues stemmed from inbreeding if they lived in a time where it was acceptable?

I'm thrilled that most users here are well-read. I've gotten great book recommendations on the farms. Not bad for basement dwellers. Lol
 
Thank you for that info!
I'm assuming his mental issues stemmed from inbreeding if they lived in a time where it was acceptable?

I'm thrilled that most users here are well-read. I've gotten great book recommendations on the farms. Not bad for basement dwellers. Lol
He wasn't inbred, it was just a genetic mishap I think. I think it was Plutarch who reckoned that Philip developed learning disabilities because Olympias tried to poison him when he was young, but there's no proof and it's more likely that he was just a regular autist. The story was likely made up long after the event to justify how a member of the royal family could have ended up like that.
The Macedonian kings were polygamous and often practiced political marriage so consanguinity was fairly low at this point, and it was only in the Hellenistic period (323-31 BC) that inbreeding really became prevalent among certain royal families out of a desire to preserve the bloodline. The Ptolemies are the most famous example.
11701.jpg
Heres Philip ii's family tree. Philip III was married to his niece, but they almost certainly didn't have a sexual relationship and she was basically just his wrangler. Marriage was mostly a political tool so sometimes people would marry relatives out of necessity but then never have kids with them.

The wikipedia article suggests that Alexander kept him around because he was fond of him but again, no proof. Imo he might have had some affection for him, but it's more likely that he just didn't see the point in killing him since he didn't present a threat.
 
The last intelligible speech he/she had was, "help me, I'm scared". He/she would wander around the house hitting his/her head and repeating "help me, I'm scared" in a monotone. Obviously, it was horribly distressing for the parents and other observers. He/she truly DID appear to be frightened; it wasn't just autistic scripting.
Fuck. New worst fear as a parent just dropped.
 
Back