Keffals / Clara Sorrenti / Lucas John Roberts / Queen Clara the Fart Dominatrix / SorrentiThott - Twitter / Twitch slacktivist. Obsessed with being famous. Operator of the Catboy Ranch. Canadian T-Girl porn star and independent Fart Fetish / Findom Dominatrix. Personally sponsored sending Chinese HRT from Brazil to children without parental consent.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
let's check in with one of Lucas' orbiters
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220902-095847_Twitter.jpg
    Screenshot_20220902-095847_Twitter.jpg
    256.4 KB · Views: 29
Feel free to clock and hat me but god damn if this isn't a peak Lucas moment:

View attachment 3670792

This mongoloid expects people to take off work with only a week's notice, shell out hundreds of dollars for travel and board in Australia, and protest on his behalf, yet he can't even he bothered to show up because its too far? This unemployed faggot has no real life obligations outside this farce of a campaign. He has both the time and capital to attend a protest he organized, yet would rather prance around in the Irish countryside like an IPtroon. At this point, Lucas is more of a woman than an activist.
Bahahaha, such fearless activism you can't be bothered to go to the very place you rile up a crowd to protest at. Also "not doing a 20 hour flight", homie you flew from Canada to Ireland I'm pretty sure that's a close length of time to 20 hours.
 
Bahahaha, such fearless activism you can't be bothered to go to the very place you rile up a crowd to protest at. Also "not doing a 20 hour flight", homie you flew from Canada to Ireland I'm pretty sure that's a close length of time to 20 hours.
Isn't he also supposed to go to San Francisco next month for the Cloudflare protest? Isn't...isn't that also a double digit flight?

This is your queen, trannies. Good job.
 
This makes absolutely zero sense.
Stochastic terrorism works as a theory, but it only applies when the cultural zeitgeist is promoting the attitudes that inspire the terrorism. Random hate crimes are obviously going to be committed more often if an entire society has a quiet, unspoken consensus that the class of victims deserve it.

The bit that makes zero sense is trying to apply the term to a fringe community of autistic weirdos who say nigger all day.
 
It doesn't even make sense, these terms are just stupid.
Stochastic defines a process of randomness, at least in the mathematical sense. Unless you have stochastic obsessiveness and compulsions (au-tism), the two words mean the same thing.

So this is how "stochastic terrorism" is defined:

This makes absolutely zero sense. Stochastic implies a large degree of random variables working together, sort of like idiots deciding to queue up for a new product. It doesn't try to imply what is and isn't probable. There isn't a distribution for say, hateful but legal rhetoric and actual crimes.

This is completely retarded, whatever happened to that correlation doesn't imply causation and spurious relations talk when it comes to crime and race?
Here, let's reword it.

Does this not sound demented? What about mass hysteria, like that psychologist who's convinced that wind turbines are causing her nausea, and a bunch of other people followed suit after the idiot asked (ie circular logic)? Stochastic wind turbines? Stochastic migraines?
Stochastic 41% yourself.

"Ontologically evil" is an even dumber combination of words.
View attachment 3670861
Good grief. This is the first search result.

So it's just being naturally evil, I guess. I hate pineapple on pizza, couldn't be because it just tastes weird, acidic, and pineapple is juicy so it turns the whole thing into a slop, my dislike of this topping must be ontological.

Using these terms just makes you look like a spaz. I guess that's better than a troon.
Both words are of Greek origin.

Stochastic = thinking/deliberation. In that context, stochastic terrorism pretty much means "terrorism of the mind," something that is not actually terrorism, but could lead to terrorism. Literally wrongthink.

Ontological = being/nature/substance. Someone who is ontologically evil is someone who was born evil.

In the context these phrases are used, they are technically and linguistically correct. Yet they are both extremely retarded concepts.
 
Feel free to clock and hat me but god damn if this isn't a peak Lucas moment:

View attachment 3670792

This mongoloid expects people to take off work with only a week's notice, shell out hundreds of dollars for travel and board in Australia, and protest on his behalf, yet he can't even he bothered to show up because its too far? This unemployed faggot has no real life obligations outside this farce of a campaign. He has both the time and capital to attend a protest he organized, yet would rather prance around in the Irish countryside like an IPtroon. At this point, Lucas is more of a woman than an activist.
To be honest he sounds like a trooned out DSP. If that is the case then I can't wait for the bankruptcy hearing which will be shared around the then named Apple farms by an avid user
 
It doesn't even make sense, these terms are just stupid.
Stochastic defines a process of randomness, at least in the mathematical sense. Unless you have stochastic obsessiveness and compulsions (au-tism), the two words mean the same thing.

So this is how "stochastic terrorism" is defined:

This makes absolutely zero sense. Stochastic implies a large degree of random variables working together, sort of like idiots deciding to queue up for a new product. It doesn't try to imply what is and isn't probable. There isn't a distribution for say, hateful but legal rhetoric and actual crimes.

This is completely retarded, whatever happened to that correlation doesn't imply causation and spurious relations talk when it comes to crime and race?
Here, let's reword it.

Does this not sound demented? What about mass hysteria, like that psychologist who's convinced that wind turbines are causing her nausea, and a bunch of other people followed suit after the idiot asked (ie circular logic)? Stochastic wind turbines? Stochastic migraines?
Stochastic 41% yourself.

"Ontologically evil" is an even dumber combination of words.
View attachment 3670861
Good grief. This is the first search result.

So it's just being naturally evil, I guess. I hate pineapple on pizza, couldn't be because it just tastes weird, acidic, and pineapple is juicy so it turns the whole thing into a slop, my dislike of this topping must be ontological.

Using these terms just makes you look like a spaz. I guess that's better than a troon.
I love seeing the example of orcs used as "ontologically evil". Orcs being naturally born evil is one of those hobby horses leftists ride to criticize J.R.R. Tolkien, & Dungeons & Dragons.

Article Archive
Orc or Victim of Cirumstance.png
or is just economic factors that produce bad ends?
8vics3e4ndu11.png
Biological determinism is unrelated to an evil nature, or biological determinism results in an evil nature, it cannot be both...
 
let's check in with one of Lucas' orbiters
At least he's admitting Chris is one of them.
Plenty of troons are trying to claim Chris isn't one of them because he "only transitioned to get women", which is false. He transitioned because he worshiped women. He wore women's clothing and regularly wore a bra.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Onni Kalsarikännit
I'm really puzzled, do troons actually know what "ontological" and "stochastic" means?
I've never used the two words outside of mathematics autism. Most will just say "random" instead of stochastic and "idea" or maybe "doctrine" instead of ontology.

If these troons think big words demonstrates their intelligence, it's not working.
This is how Dictionary.com defines "stochastic terrorism": -

The public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of a violent act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted.

Of course, it never applies to them. Troons and TRAs are constantly demonising women who aren't 100% on board with their gender horse shit as "TERFs", and they will often say that TERFs deserved to be punched, stabbed, raped, shot or whatever, and in some cases, women have been physically attacked by mentally ill troons or TRAs.

They have no consistent principles. It ultimately comes down to "it's OK when we do it", because it ties in with the "ontologically evil" part, where they believe they are the good guys fighting people who are inherently evil by nature.

I just want fat greasy eunuchs to leave kids alone, so if that makes me a "terrorist" or "evil", then so be it.
 
This mongoloid expects people to take off work with only a week's notice, shell out hundreds of dollars for travel and board in Australia, and protest on his behalf, yet he can't even he bothered to show up because its too far? This unemployed faggot has no real life obligations outside this farce of a campaign. He has both the time and capital to attend a protest he organized, yet would rather prance around in the Irish countryside like an IPtroon. At this point, Lucas is more of a woman than an activist.
Lucas is a puppet, LFJ is the person behind the protest in AUS, because it's part of his attempt in bullying them into blackholing the network. Lucas admitted around the time of the destiny arc that he started working with "several high profile trans people". In the interview archived in LFJ's thread, LFJ even says something to the effect of "when keffals started to get eyes on him, we decided it would be a good chance to push the dropkiwifarms thing again". Lucas is a mere puppet, a useful idiot to the really insane people with a grudge. Lucas is only part of this because he has a large audience of children and retards.
 
They have no consistent principles. It ultimately comes down to "it's OK when we do it", because it ties in with the "ontologically evil" part, where they believe they are the good guys fighting people who are inherently evil by nature.
Of course, if they believe others are ontologically evil, they believe themselves to be... ontologically good. And ontologically good people can literally do no wrong, after all.
 
This makes absolutely zero sense. Stochastic implies a large degree of random variables working together, sort of like idiots deciding to queue up for a new product. It doesn't try to imply what is and isn't probable. There isn't a distribution for say, hateful but legal rhetoric and actual crimes.

This is completely retarded, whatever happened to that correlation doesn't imply causation and spurious relations talk when it comes to crime and race?
Here, let's reword it.
This is literally what Lucas is doing.

I don't support Kiwi Farms being brought down by an illegal DDoS attack, but it's a very good thing, and we need to get Cloudflare to drop their DDoS protection of Kiwi Farms.

This is Joshua Conner Moon's mom. She's ontologically evil and helped create her awful transphobe son. I hope no one gets her fired... ;)

He's so disingenuous. I haven't seen hypocrisy this blatant and accepted as fact in a while.
 
Stochastic terrorism works as a theory, but it only applies when the cultural zeitgeist is promoting the attitudes that inspire the terrorism. Random hate crimes are obviously going to be committed more often if an entire society has a quiet, unspoken consensus that the class of victims deserve it.

The bit that makes zero sense is trying to apply the term to a fringe community of autistic weirdos who say nigger all day.
Both words are of Greek origin.

Stochastic = thinking/deliberation. In that context, stochastic terrorism pretty much means "terrorism of the mind," something that is not actually terrorism, but could lead to terrorism. Literally wrongthink.

Ontological = being/nature/substance. Someone who is ontologically evil is someone who was born evil.

In the context these phrases are used, they are technically and linguistically correct. Yet they are both extremely retarded concepts.
Well, the English language definition is a lot more precise. For stochastic terrorism to make sense as a phrase, giving that stochastic as a word is strictly mathematical, there must be a lot of factors in the equation that likely has their own weight (ie percentage) as well. It won't just be some rally where people are spewing hate, it'll be the guy's mood all the way to the colour of his dilator and you can even argue the 41% remaining battery of his vibrating buttplug can be included.

Here's the kicker, in stochastic processes, each category could play a role in the outcome, you can say it's justifying an outcome.
So some idiot attends a weird glowing rally, gets mad at his Jewish girlfriend and Tyrone whom she cheated on him with, and his Latina mum didn't cook his tendies, he goes and torches a Black church and then shoots up a synagogue.
Does any of that justify his actions?

Oh wow, imagine the horrifying undertones when reality is broken into numbers.

Or in plain terms, the premise of this term is wrong and stupid. The word is misused. People who use such a phrase should just lick an icy pillar in Siberia.

I'm gonna stop drinking and go lick some ice pillars (ie shut up).
 
I love seeing the example of orcs used as "ontologically evil". Orcs being naturally born evil is one of those hobby horses leftists ride to criticize J.R.R. Tolkien, & Dungeons & Dragons.

Article Archive
View attachment 3670908
or is just economic factors that produce bad ends?
View attachment 3670916
Biological determinism is unrelated to an evil nature, or biological determinism results in an evil nature, it cannot be both...
Orcs are just a social construct!
 
I love seeing the example of orcs used as "ontologically evil". Orcs being naturally born evil is one of those hobby horses leftists ride to criticize J.R.R. Tolkien, & Dungeons & Dragons.

Article Archive
View attachment 3670908
or is just economic factors that produce bad ends?
View attachment 3670916
Biological determinism is unrelated to an evil nature, or biological determinism results in an evil nature, it cannot be both...
Even better. One origin is that the first dark lord twisted them and forced them to shift to a disgusting evil form also making them all evil. Wonder if anyone we know is like that?
 
(Ruined own life) + (Army of journos) =

View attachment 3670902


Added bonus* attention of internet artists

Sometimes, via the tread, I see all the good stuff he got that has come out of him saying that Kiwifarms is your "nemisis" and is "super evil" being overall as dumb as Twitter, that I thought he could have been some genuis who acts like a retard in order to get this cash and brownie points from the forever online crowd to able to do a lot of what he wants to do, which is to grift cash and groom the catboys.


Then I realized that nobody smart would link their grooming account to their main, nor done what he would have done to "takedown" kiwifarms. Plus, a lot of the past stuff suggests he isn't fond of good choices in life.


Maybe I'm retarded, but sometimes when you see the cash he made and the validation, you can kind of see how he keeps saying some of the dumb stuff he said. With the social pressure of social media being as strong as it is to him because he cannot be offline, it is possible he will kill himself if he gets blowback from the catboy ranch, or for just being kind of an asshole overall.


The world would be a better place for kids, if he did.


tl;dr Keffals is a instant gratification dopamine addict who does what he does for tweet likes and drug money, and explains his entire reason of being, besides maybe e-sex with teens.
 
Back