Gamergate III: Rise of the Machines

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are the wind beneath our wings. Semper Fidelis.

EDIT: It gets so much better. @Spectator, your contributions to the lulz have been magical.

Ghazi is going into full-blown meltdown mode, and holy shit is it amazing
. In there, however, I found probably the fucking funniest post any Ghazi user has made since the infamous Zoe Quinn meltdown that @Alan Pardew mocked perfectly:

LB4v6Uc.png


:story:
Any forum that charges 10bux to register deserves to be hated, SJW haven or not.
 
Man, the Neogaf thread is truly depressing:

I just looked at this woman's thesis and it made me queasy as the father of two girls. No question she's a child porn apologist. I don't care about this Gamergate crap but it is weird to me that someone with those extreme views would be employed in such a public-facing position by Nintendo.

I'm not racist but...


---

This is the funniest (read: absolutely not funny) thing. She's not hiding this shit, Nintendo certainly knows.

Reminds me of when Lindsey Ellis (Nostalgia Chick) was talking about constant internet harassment, and how people would bring up her abortion like it was something they dug up from her past. When in reality, she made a documentary about it and has never once tried to hide it

Nintendo knew so much that they told Jaime that they didn't have any idea (Nintendo incompetence... but hey...)
 
Last edited:
Any forum that charges 10bux to register deserves to be hated, SJW haven or not.

Quinn, Lifschitz, Spacedad, Nyberg, Kirtaner, Randwhale, Ryulong, and a fucking host of other Anti-GGers are ex-SA alumni, so we have that as well.

Ten buck cucks are bigger lolcows than Ghazi.

Listen to this man, for he speaks truth.

They want to punish a woman for having opinions by whichever means necessary, it's that simple. They don't care if their accusations are nonsensical or hypocritical, mosly because they're emotionally stunted halfwits with no shame but also because they work regardless of the facts.

FAoyE8E.gif


This image exists for this purpose.
 
Man, Gaf is truly working in their mental gymnastics:

I'm a freelance writer, my personal brand is important. No one has every asked me about my college papers on social media, but if they did, what am I going to do, lie?

I get the benefit of not being targeted for thorough research because I'm a man who says mean things about video games. Should it ever come up, it comes up, and I imagine I will handle it in the same way of "I argued for these things in academia, yes."

But I bet you don't double it down after getting caught or arguing be in favor of it as close as Dec 2015 or having a link of it in your motherfucking online corriculum.

----

The people who are arguing that the gaming community/industry didn't just allow GG to happen but also fostered it, need to wake up.

Stop defending it.

Edit: Wow. This victim blaming.

Man.... fuck you

----

I had no idea who this was and despite reading some of the material here I don't understand why they were singled out. I have a feeling that "anti sex trafficking org" is just a font for a group of people who want to harass people while looking less suspicious.

Welp.

---

I want to answer this person because I actually like this person and he actually did something that I really appreciate, not going to post a user name but I will say it because I don't know how else to do it:

Yeah, like, if I were a gender studies academic, a thesis I might've written about a controversial topic. That might be a good professional thing to put on my linkedin

Yeah, but her job is not academic related: Is fucking PR. Don't get me wrong, we should separate academic work from professional one but her current job is about being a spokerman of a big corporation. She has made clear that she actually agrees with the stuff she is saying in her thesis to the point of saying that is 'political view that is not secret'. This is how she is presenting herself and her company in social media, and this is how she choose to present herself in her corriculum. Nintendo has fired people FOR LESS and has taken company decisions FOR LESS, gender studies academics have asked for the head of other people FOR LESS. So yeah, I think there is a genuine reason to somebody to complain about how a spokerman of big corp is having this views, specially since seem to be unchanged and open to the public.
 
Last edited:
She is the creator of an ONG with Kevin Smith and she received lots of spam and believed on it without checking.

She is nowhere close a gamergater and aparently already saw that she was wrong ?

Welp, she got the part of her not being GG right at least...

----

You're reading into my post a lot of stuff I didn't do or say.

When I say -- She's going to come out of this ahead -- I'm speaking to her credit and I'm sticking it to the Gamergate morons. You don't have to guess what side I'm on. I'm telling you what side I'm on. I have never had a negative thought towards Alison Rapp. She seems really cool.

I have a deja vu of witch hunt...
 
Last edited:
If she gets fired, she's just going to make a Patreon and rake in the hipster bucks.

Although considering that Firefox's CEO got fired for donating to an anti-gay charity, I wonder what are the chances you can get fired for donating to a pedophile apologist.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: TheRedRanger
If she gets fired, she's just going to make a Patreon and rake in the hipster bucks.

Although considering that Firefox's CEO got fired for donating to an anti-gay charity, I wonder what are the chances you can get fired for donating to a pedophile apologist.

He didn't actually get fired. He resigned under fire, but not at the demand of the Mozilla Foundation itself. They even have a FAQ about this. They even offered him a comparable position if he resigned as CEO and did not want to get rid of him. I think the whole brouhaha and the pressure put on the Foundation to try to make it impossible to do his job.

I just don't think the Foundation itself should take flak for something they didn't do.
 
So recently it was revealed that Bravely Second has had sweeping changes that - you guessed it - cripple the game in some fashion (this time, fucking over the bittersweet or tragic moments the game can have):

Gamezone said:
Bravely Second's localization is a real hatchet job that has been leaking to us piecemeal. First they altered the Tomahawk job class, they started covering more skin in the character costumes, and finally they are censoring art in the art book. No, I'm not arguing that we should see sexy costumes as art and complain they're covering the girls up: They are literally removing art from art books. This is actual art censorship we're talking about. Will these stereotypical censorship villains try to put pants on Michelangelo's David next?

Just when you thought it couldn't get anymore ridiculous, the latest localization failure falls upon us with the grace of a cow dropped from an airplane. Unfortunately, this time it isn't a joke, entire story lines have been removed from the game so that players can only receive one outcome:

"They removed all the non-neutral sidequest/Asterisk quest outcomes; any choices that would cause characters to die have been removed. Whatever choice you make now, you'll receive the neutral outcome where both sides make it out ok. Compare this to the Japanese versions where you had 4 different outcomes, with VOICED cutscenes!" [Source]

Wonderful, now there are no sad or bittersweet storylines, and your choices don't matter. Just what people want in all their RPGs. What a brilliant decision on the part of the localization team.

As some of you may be wondering, Nintendo is the company publishing Bravely Second in the West.
 
I'd say people supporting Sarkeesian / Brianna Wu / Quinn / Randwhale on Patreon get their money's worth. It's not like they care about them producing anything, they just donate to:
1) Alleviate their white-straight-male guilt
2) Pretend they are progressives supporting strong womyn against the patriarchy to their friends
3) Promote their SJW / Feminist ideology

All of the above are achieved much easier if Sarkeesian / Brianna Wu / Quinn / Randwhale gives lectures at university on oppresshiun / cries on twitter all day / gives botched U.N. speeches about muhsoggyknee / harass and doxxes ideological opponents, instead of actually making videos / creating games / doing... whatever it is Quinn pretends to do / making "anti-cyberbullying" software.

You forgot:

4) Defending these women will make male feminists less "toxic" and "masculine" in the eyes of women they want to sleep with.

I really dunno who the fuck to blame for this shit but seems that the only constant is NoA or Nintendo being the publisher. People namedrop 8-4 and Treehouse but at the end seems that Nintendo itself is the one calling the shoots of the most inane decisions that involves coding.

Why the heck somebody thinks that removing bad endings from side quests is worthwhile at all is anyone guess. Are Nintendo, Square Enix or 8-4 that deluded in thinking they can pass the Bravely franchise as a kid friendly one just by changing a aspect of the games while leaving the already pretty dark main story mostly unchanged?

Seems people are getting gutter in Treehouse but I fear the problem is beyond employees like Nich or Alison Rapp and more like their enablers.

But hey, the SJWs say that fuck us even if they agree the changes are BS, as willing to admit that censorship often gives more leeway to companies to do shit like this (whatever it makes sense or not) would be admitting "yes we are taking your games... Hell we are taking out the games we like but NO U"

I fear for #FE, as people have said that is actually a very good game if very, very, very Japanese centric

is this a case of "whaa, losing hurts my feelings?"


God forbid you lose sometimes in a video game.


It simply doesn't occur to this type of person that having a PR job for a company that sells things to children and openly advocating on behalf of child pornography might be incongruent. If she had, she wouldn't have proudly put it in her online resume.

You know some of these people will gladly join a lynchmob if a male employee was accused of being a misogynist or a sexual harasser or whatever.

But a woman losing her job because she defends pedos? GAMERGAAAAAATE

Women can't be pedos! Just look at Sarah.
But seriously, someone like Alison doesn't deserve any pity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back