Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

[Vito Gesualdi]

Alternately, being outed as a pedo put him into a manic state where he had a major public meltdown that lasted for a long time instead of being some kind of 20d chess move that didn't even come close to working.

You know what, these stupid accusations have been floating around on here unchallenged long enough that I might as well address them.


So I had recently watched a debate about non-offending pedophiles, and as a typical pussy liberal I agreed with the basic assertion that mental health care and treatment are the best way to deal with the problem, not just useless fantasizing about throwing them in a woodchipper. So I posted a tweet basically repeating what I had heard in the debate.


Somebody then asked me to define non-offending, so I farted out a tweet that read to me like "we (me and you) would understand that term to mean someone who doesn't break the law." I still believe it reads that way, I would love someone with an English background to prove me wrong.


When people started accusing my tweet of having a different meaning, I corrected the record multiple times (strange how no one ever posts those screenshots). Yes, I "sperged out" or whatever but when thousands of people are calling you a pedophile without caring about your attempt to clarify what you meant, you might go a little nuts too.

If I wanted to out myself as a pedophile, why would I wait for some random guy to question me about the definition of non-offending? This theory that I was trying to be some sort of sneaky pedo who gets off on teasing people about my pedo status is stupid as hell. And why would I immediately try to plead otherwise if I'm supposedly getting off on it? Wouldn't I be frantically beating my dick, violently aroused by all the negative attention, instead of fighting all day about the actual meaning of my tweet?

People also claim that I "constantly joke" about being a pedophile, which is just a bullshit lie. There was a point after I defended mrgirl that people would attack and call me a pedo, and occasionally I would reply with shit like "better hide your kids then!" But this was just me not knowing what the hell you're supposed to do when people make those accusations, because simply pleading "gosh guys I'm really not a pedophile!" isn't effective either. I have a channel full of hours of content, I can't think of any pedo jokes I've made on there. Why would I not use my largest platform to make these jokes I'm supposedly getting off on?

Anyway, in summary: I'm friends with mrgirl, I think the movie Cuties is valid and legal expression under U.S. law, I made a few jokes to fuck with haters who called me a pedophile, and I worded a tweet ambiguously. Believe whatever you want, but since we seem to live in a time where everybody and their brother is being falsely labeled a pedophile I really don't care anymore. The only people who believe these allegations are terminally online losers who didn't like me to begin with.

 

[0 0]

You know what, these stupid accusations have been floating around on here unchallenged long enough that I might as well address them.


So I had recently watched a debate about non-offending pedophiles, and as a typical pussy liberal I agreed with the basic assertion that mental health care and treatment are the best way to deal with the problem, not just useless fantasizing about throwing them in a woodchipper. So I posted a tweet basically repeating what I had heard in the debate.


Somebody then asked me to define non-offending, so I farted out a tweet that read to me like "we (me and you) would understand that term to mean someone who doesn't break the law." I still believe it reads that way, I would love someone with an English background to prove me wrong.


When people started accusing my tweet of having a different meaning, I corrected the record multiple times (strange how no one ever posts those screenshots). Yes, I "sperged out" or whatever but when thousands of people are calling you a pedophile without caring about your attempt to clarify what you meant, you might go a little nuts too.

If I wanted to out myself as a pedophile, why would I wait for some random guy to question me about the definition of non-offending? This theory that I was trying to be some sort of sneaky pedo who gets off on teasing people about my pedo status is stupid as hell. And why would I immediately try to plead otherwise if I'm supposedly getting off on it? Wouldn't I be frantically beating my dick, violently aroused by all the negative attention, instead of fighting all day about the actual meaning of my tweet?

People also claim that I "constantly joke" about being a pedophile, which is just a bullshit lie. There was a point after I defended mrgirl that people would attack and call me a pedo, and occasionally I would reply with shit like "better hide your kids then!" But this was just me not knowing what the hell you're supposed to do when people make those accusations, because simply pleading "gosh guys I'm really not a pedophile!" isn't effective either. I have a channel full of hours of content, I can't think of any pedo jokes I've made on there. Why would I not use my largest platform to make these jokes I'm supposedly getting off on?

Anyway, in summary: I'm friends with mrgirl, I think the movie Cuties is valid and legal expression under U.S. law, I made a few jokes to fuck with haters who called me a pedophile, and I worded a tweet ambiguously. Believe whatever you want, but since we seem to live in a time where everybody and their brother is being falsely labeled a pedophile I really don't care anymore. The only people who believe these allegations are terminally online losers who didn't like me to begin with.

How compelling.

Please verify yourself in our Talk To Staff section by providing evidence proving your identity, Until then, you are permanently threadbanned.

https://kiwifarms.st/forums/talk-to-staff.26/

 

[Jack Awful]

I'm sorry for summoning the beast

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

I'm sorry for summoning the beast

You will be forgiven after you've finished your ritualistic suicide.

 

[Blacklight]

If that is the real Vito your, "Lol I was only pretending" shit stops being funny after the 1st time you do it. You aren't Amos Lee. Christ, your fat ass was enough to get me to stop listening and I was one of the callers people still bring up.

 

[Jack Awful]

Somebody then asked me to define non-offending, so I farted out a tweet that read to me like "we (me and you) would understand that term to mean someone who doesn't break the law." I still believe it reads that way, I would love someone with an English background to prove me wrong.

That is 100% NOT what you said:


The "we" only makes sense grammatically if you are a member of the non offending pedophile group.

I don't know how deceivers masturbate, but saying you're a pedophile isn't the deception, walking it back is, you probably started jerking after that.

You're fat, annoying, unfunny, you turn everything you touch to feces, and that stink has probably gotten into a few LA county girl's swimsuit areas.

 

[Journoscum]

Somebody then asked me to define non-offending, so I farted out a tweet that read to me like "we (me and you) would understand that term to mean someone who doesn't break the law." I still believe it reads that way, I would love someone with an English background to prove me wrong.

I will play along with this larp. I don't have the screenshot on me, but I wonder what someone with an English background would say about the "We? We" tweet?

The person pretty clearly was asking you what you meant by we. "We?" in this context pretty clearly means 'you mean you're including yourself among the pedophiles?' I think even the biggest of retards could figure that one out. Except for you apparently, as you just shot out a very simple and confirming response. "We."

So is your defense that you were too dense to understand what he was getting at? If you say 'I am really dumb' I might believe you.

 

[Berrakh]

So I had recently watched a debate about non-offending pedophiles, and as a typical pussy liberal I agreed with the basic assertion that mental health care and treatment are the best way to deal with the problem, not just useless fantasizing about throwing them in a woodchipper. So I posted a tweet basically repeating what I had heard in the debate.

But this would be effective without cringe libtards like you stopping it (along with releasing every other type of criminal from jail).
Even if I were to believe your excuses your moral code and general belief system is questionable and gives cover to despicable people.
And you do have a lot of traits of a truly demented pervert: you love pornography and nudity and sex work without shame, you struggle to keep your frame of mind consistent, and you have an impulsive aversion to anything that's uplifting instead of pleasurable.

Before it's suggested this is woo; this is exactly what Amos Yee was like. And Nick Bates (although I keep myself blissfully unaware of that story's finer details). They had obscene brains and a dislike of any punitive system. Because obviously if you're involved in the filthiest crime it's possible to imagine you need to do away with the concept of punishment.

 

[Null]

I'm sorry but pedophiles aren't welcome on the site. I'd give Vito a fair shake like everyone else (if that is even him), but he's a chronic attention whore on top of everything. There's no benefit what so ever to having him here because he'll still post 100 times a day on Twitter.

 

[Love me not]

You know what, these stupid accusations have been floating around on here unchallenged long enough that I might as well address them.


So I had recently watched a debate about non-offending pedophiles, and as a typical pussy liberal I agreed with the basic assertion that mental health care and treatment are the best way to deal with the problem, not just useless fantasizing about throwing them in a woodchipper. So I posted a tweet basically repeating what I had heard in the debate.


Somebody then asked me to define non-offending, so I farted out a tweet that read to me like "we (me and you) would understand that term to mean someone who doesn't break the law." I still believe it reads that way, I would love someone with an English background to prove me wrong.


When people started accusing my tweet of having a different meaning, I corrected the record multiple times (strange how no one ever posts those screenshots). Yes, I "sperged out" or whatever but when thousands of people are calling you a pedophile without caring about your attempt to clarify what you meant, you might go a little nuts too.

If I wanted to out myself as a pedophile, why would I wait for some random guy to question me about the definition of non-offending? This theory that I was trying to be some sort of sneaky pedo who gets off on teasing people about my pedo status is stupid as hell. And why would I immediately try to plead otherwise if I'm supposedly getting off on it? Wouldn't I be frantically beating my dick, violently aroused by all the negative attention, instead of fighting all day about the actual meaning of my tweet?

People also claim that I "constantly joke" about being a pedophile, which is just a bullshit lie. There was a point after I defended mrgirl that people would attack and call me a pedo, and occasionally I would reply with shit like "better hide your kids then!" But this was just me not knowing what the hell you're supposed to do when people make those accusations, because simply pleading "gosh guys I'm really not a pedophile!" isn't effective either. I have a channel full of hours of content, I can't think of any pedo jokes I've made on there. Why would I not use my largest platform to make these jokes I'm supposedly getting off on?

Anyway, in summary: I'm friends with mrgirl, I think the movie Cuties is valid and legal expression under U.S. law, I made a few jokes to fuck with haters who called me a pedophile, and I worded a tweet ambiguously. Believe whatever you want, but since we seem to live in a time where everybody and their brother is being falsely labeled a pedophile I really don't care anymore. The only people who believe these allegations are terminally online losers who didn't like me to begin with.

What are you gonna gain from trying to debate people here? Did you think you were gonna convince everyone that we were wrong, and all the haters would go away? It literally takes negative effort to not log into Kiwifarms. go be an attention seeking faggot elsewhere.

 

[3322]

I'm sorry but pedophiles aren't welcome on the site.

Oh no, bad news Vtuber sisters.

 

[genericwhitemale]

You know what, these stupid accusations have been floating around on here unchallenged long enough that I might as well address them.


So I had recently watched a debate about non-offending pedophiles, and as a typical pussy liberal I agreed with the basic assertion that mental health care and treatment are the best way to deal with the problem, not just useless fantasizing about throwing them in a woodchipper. So I posted a tweet basically repeating what I had heard in the debate.


Somebody then asked me to define non-offending, so I farted out a tweet that read to me like "we (me and you) would understand that term to mean someone who doesn't break the law." I still believe it reads that way, I would love someone with an English background to prove me wrong.


When people started accusing my tweet of having a different meaning, I corrected the record multiple times (strange how no one ever posts those screenshots). Yes, I "sperged out" or whatever but when thousands of people are calling you a pedophile without caring about your attempt to clarify what you meant, you might go a little nuts too.

If I wanted to out myself as a pedophile, why would I wait for some random guy to question me about the definition of non-offending? This theory that I was trying to be some sort of sneaky pedo who gets off on teasing people about my pedo status is stupid as hell. And why would I immediately try to plead otherwise if I'm supposedly getting off on it? Wouldn't I be frantically beating my dick, violently aroused by all the negative attention, instead of fighting all day about the actual meaning of my tweet?

People also claim that I "constantly joke" about being a pedophile, which is just a bullshit lie. There was a point after I defended mrgirl that people would attack and call me a pedo, and occasionally I would reply with shit like "better hide your kids then!" But this was just me not knowing what the hell you're supposed to do when people make those accusations, because simply pleading "gosh guys I'm really not a pedophile!" isn't effective either. I have a channel full of hours of content, I can't think of any pedo jokes I've made on there. Why would I not use my largest platform to make these jokes I'm supposedly getting off on?

Anyway, in summary: I'm friends with mrgirl, I think the movie Cuties is valid and legal expression under U.S. law, I made a few jokes to fuck with haters who called me a pedophile, and I worded a tweet ambiguously. Believe whatever you want, but since we seem to live in a time where everybody and their brother is being falsely labeled a pedophile I really don't care anymore. The only people who believe these allegations are terminally online losers who didn't like me to begin with.

Why are you friends with a guy who said he was attracted to the kids in Cuties?

 

[Devout Muslim]

Listened to the episode with Karl on it. Really quite boring. Funny to hear him still mad at Josh for “breaking up” with him and his gloating about the farms being down. It was funny to hear Karl just say “no” re: apology.

Sorry mate this is fucking dumb. I don't think Vito is smart enough, and emotionally stable enough to think of a plan like that.

Can you please clarify this point? As I understand it: 1) Vito alluded to himself being a pedophile. 2) Vito unexpected copped an extraordinary backlash. 3) Vito deleted everything and exhibited a high level of instability.

What he did required literally no intelligence or emotional stability.

 

[genericwhitemale]

Listened to the episode with Karl on it. Really quite boring. Funny to hear him still mad at Josh for “breaking up” with him and his gloating about the farms being down. It was funny to hear Karl just say “no” re: apology.

Can you upload a fair use, transformative clip of them talking about it?

 

[Devout Muslim]

Can you upload a fair use, transformative clip of them talking about it?

No, I can’t sorry. I don’t have the technical skills nor the inclination. He doesn’t get ad revenue from the show anyway.

The Kiwifarms / Keffals bit is at 1:06:00 of The Dick Show episode 324 and lasts for about 2 or 3 minutes. Ralph comes on at 1:37:00 (give or take 20 seconds) and the show becomes fairly entertaining. Karl is ribbing Ralph the entire time and he gets aggravated.

 

[AnOminous]

Can you please clarify this point? As I understand it: 1) Vito alluded to himself being a pedophile. 2) Vito unexpected copped an extraordinary backlash. 3) Vito deleted everything and exhibited a high level of instability.

He's pulling the usual "out of context" bullshit creeps like this pull after saying something damning, when the context of years of creepy pedo behavior by him only makes him look even worse.

 

[Berrakh]

He's pulling the usual "out of context" bullshit creeps like this pull after saying something damning, when the context of years of creepy pedo behavior by him only makes him look even worse.

If you have a thousand narrow excuses you're just making excuses.
Let's say Vito says 10 possibly pedophilic statements. And for each one there is a 50/50 shot it's innocent but misconstrued.

Well only one has to be over the line for him to look like a pedophile. All have to be innocent to clear him. So there is a .097656% chance it's safe to trust him.

These were all made up numbers but the principle is consistent: tenuous rationalizations only go so far, while a causal relationship will be big and repeatable (just like Vito repeatedly softening the image of pedophilia).

 

[genericwhitemale]

No, I can’t sorry. I don’t have the technical skills nor the inclination. He doesn’t get ad revenue from the show anyway.

The Kiwifarms / Keffals bit is at 1:06:00 of The Dick Show episode 324 and lasts for about 2 or 3 minutes. Ralph comes on at 1:37:00 (give or take 20 seconds) and the show becomes fairly entertaining. Karl is ribbing Ralph the entire time and he gets aggravated.

Oh it's on the Dick show. Nvm then. When you said him and Karl, I thought it was one of their bonus episodes.

 

[Love me not]

Can you please clarify this point? As I understand it: 1) Vito alluded to himself being a pedophile. 2) Vito unexpected copped an extraordinary backlash. 3) Vito deleted everything and exhibited a high level of instability.

What he did required literally no intelligence or emotional stability.

The post I was replying to implied that it was a tactical action to divert from admitting he is a pedophile. On one hand the accusation is that he gets excited, as pedos do, when admitting he himself is a pedophile. Then to cover the trail he goes on some weird Twitter tirade. If Vito was trying to get a shock I don't think he would immediately break down like that. It's got to be one or the other, and I choose to believe that Vito is just an unfunny faggot who too an argument in an unfunny faggot direction.

In the event that a hard-drive with 3.6 terabytes of CP is found in his man child den I will issue a full apology to everyone in this thread that I doubted.

 

[Nod Flenders]

That is 100% NOT what you said:

View attachment 3713743
The "we" only makes sense grammatically if you are a member of the non offending pedophile group.

I don't know how deceivers masturbate, but saying you're a pedophile isn't the deception, walking it back is, you probably started jerking after that.

You're fat, annoying, unfunny, you turn everything you touch to feces, and that stink has probably gotten into a few LA county girl's swimsuit areas.

Further proof that Vito is indeed a dirty pedophile.