Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
would you rather 8 nails in your coffin (the coffin being freedom), or nine?

Frankly I don’t consider YouTube to be a nail at all.
Payment processors is a nail, but YouTube and other social media platforms are just a reaction to that nail rather than nails the themselves.

Other sites exist. They don’t have the brand recognition or userbase, but Nick is far from censored
 
Why was the channel for the funny lawyer man terminated? Kinda sad, dude had like a million views on their videos.
Rackets should have utilized the "Jim Method". Make 4 innocuous videos about the weather and any live stream you do, shill the merch, collect the superberries and delete. Let the most die hard followers mirror and archive the videos.

Glad I could help.
 

Attachments

  • MV5BYzNhMGQzY2ItZmFhMC00NmY3LWJlYjgtMjA2OTMwNjI4MGQ0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDY3OTcyOQ@@._V1_.jpg
    MV5BYzNhMGQzY2ItZmFhMC00NmY3LWJlYjgtMjA2OTMwNjI4MGQ0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDY3OTcyOQ@@._V1_.jpg
    58.2 KB · Views: 60
Just pointing out that in the Destiny thread some people gave the dude shit for not coming out guns blazing, deliberately misgendering, attacking the journalists, etc. when dealing with the troon shit, because apparently that's being a pussy and not just having wise restraint.

Well this is what happens when you don't do that.
As much as it sucks, when you're dealing with a corporate environment like the internet you have to be willing to play the game. Threatening to share damning personal info on stream rather than quietly releasing them through some other channel that can create plausible deniability, even if everyone is 99% sure it's you, is absolutely moronic, because it allows them to zero in the crosshairs.

These people are essentially a feral pack, by and large they aren't very smart and they all hate each other. However if you try to pull tough guy shit corporations will not protect you from the mob. Ever.
 
Rackets should have utilized the "Jim"Method". Make 4 innocuous videos about the weather and any live stream you do, shill the merch, collect the superberries and delete. Let the most die hard followers mirror and archive the videos.

Glad I could help.
Reminds me of when Razorfist proved that demonetization isn't an algorithm, but a deliberate blacklist, by uploading an inoccuous video and showing it get demonetized in real time.

As for Rackets and Youtube, anyone who values free speech needs to fight for every inch of ground they can. Being consigned to the alt-tech ghettos is conceding defeat.

You can't get your message out and have it taken seriously when you're having to share a bunk on BitChute with loons and controlled ops like David Icke.
 
Unprecedented if you ignore the other times it has happened. Just because they only removed 2 sites for "vague" reasons, cloudflare has a history of removing sites all the time.
The difference being that a literal prostitution marketplace (which is what Switter is/was) is illegal in the jurisdiction Cloudflare is subject to, which is consistent with their policy. You probably couldn't set up your auto-sear store with Cloudflare either.

You are also missing a key point of differentiation, which is that Switter relied on Cloudflare for their content delivery network; not just their DDoS protection services. The difference is that, to Switter, Cloudflare is like a cop saying "I'm not going to send you the credit card numbers for your fraud ring anymore" vs for us it's more like "I'm not going to protect you from that angry mob looking to rip you apart after we've already arrested you for your fraud ring".

It is indeed pretty rare to see that DDoS protection revoked.
 
Why would the government fight itself?

Who do you think controls these platforms?
Because the government (or really any large enough bodies) are comprised of private actors who only cooperate due to it benefitting them. The moment that stops they'll happily go against the status quo

So with the justice system, if lawyers see that tech corporations can silence their online presence they might decide to fight back.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: yydszmiteg2
Because the government (or really any large enough bodies) are comprised of private actors who only cooperate due to it benefitting them. The moment that stops they'll happily go against the status quo

So with the justice system, if lawyers see that tech corporations can silence their online presence they might decide to fight back.

Here’s hoping some lawyers have their eyes opened. The troon scourge will not stop until they eliminate all opposition. They want total control so they can groom and be degenerates in public without pushback.
 
Hey I've got a bit of a weird question for those of you who haven't denounced YouTube entirely but were previously subscribed to Nick.

I am not subscribed to Law&Crime, I do not interact with the channel in the slightest. However, this morning I got a recommendation for the channel as a push notification sent to my phone. I don't get these very often, so seeing it did stand out to me. This left a sour taste in my mouth because I know they were assblasted about Nick using their streams of court cases and making crazy $ off of it.

This might seem far-fetched but I'm wondering if there's more to this than just the trannies, because that feels a little too on the nose. Did anyone else experience something similar, or am I just being retarded over a coincidence?

Given the track record of L&C as well as YouTube shills doing strange shit, I don't want to write off the possibility that more bad actors have been involved.
 
The law was only passed last month. How could it have been upheld.....twice?

Catch up:


It has already caused a circuit split between the 5th and a precedent that was already established in the 11th. The 5th can hear the case again, or otherwise it's on its way to the SCOTUS to resolve the circuit split.
 
This might seem far-fetched but I'm wondering if there's more to this than just the trannies, because that feels a little too on the nose. Did anyone else experience something similar, or am I just being retarded over a coincidence?
It's worth a thunk or two. They paid to have their channel artificially promoted in the algo and yet rackets still made way more than them, in both views ands simpbux.

Nick should have listened to the trannies, now his kids are going to starve!
This trufax post checked and verified REAL TRUTH, by the same people that conclusively proved kiwi farms is totally dead, for realsies this time.
 
"Against the wall" has been an internet colloquialism for executions for years. I haven't ever heard against the wall used in the context of legally processing someone.
Aktually he said this
1665021023371.png

Shtoopid shtinky

And? You think he’s ever gonna make the same amount of griftbucks he made on YouTube? Lmao
Rumble takes less of a cut than Jewtube
 
Last edited:
Back