Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 76 18.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.8%

  • Total voters
    417
Cutting off funding isn't the point. The point is to limit the chance that normies will stumble into your content and "become radicalized"
Cutting off funding is another way to block a message, since money is one of the few things that can cut through censorship if you have enough of it and without it, you're relegated to fringe platforms. The trouble is they're deplatforming so many people that the normies are (slowly) starting to migrate as well. Soon those fringe platforms won't be so "fringe."

These people are essentially a feral pack, by and large they aren't very smart and they all hate each other. However if you try to pull tough guy shit corporations will not protect you from the mob. Ever.
This is why you always assume you will be standing alone against the angry mob and plan accordingly. It's important that when you "pull tough guy shit," you have the ability and willingness to follow through with it, corporate protection be damned.

There's a possibility Ken Paxton will sue for him. HB 20 is in effect and Nick has connections. Ty Beard had a Texas state senator working for him.
Ty Beard is not an attorney I would want anywhere near this case, because I would like it to have at least some chance of success and that fat fuck has proven himself to be lazy and utterly incompetent.
 
Anyone with a youtube account who watches political videos is going to end up in a bubble anyway because of the recommended videos algorithm. Any time I open youtube on a incognito tab and look at the feed I feel like my IQ measurably drops. The only exceptions are a few left wing channels/videos that getting shilled by youtube regardless.
Plenty of people broke ranks on issues like Rittenhouse because of Rekieta.
 
Plenty of people broke ranks on issues like Rittenhouse because of Rekieta.
It's interesting how Youtube itself, as in the people behind it, really push leftist content manually, but given enough time the algorithm will eventually push you towards Tim Pool and others that are more right wing or libertarian. I didn't even watch anything political on one of my accounts, just stuff like SunnyV2, Internet Historian, and Big Boss and I still eventually saw the recommendations push me towards Rackets and co.

It's almost like the AI is trying to tell them that globohomo isn't the way to go.
 
Because big corpos hate everything that is not bland, thrice processed shit.
This sort of establishment is the bane of creativity and humour.
Why does creativity even matter? History is over and the eternal present will be predictable and non-offensive. Don't mind hatethinkers like ... whatever his name was, it doesn't matter. Those people (lol) are simply being mopped up.
 
Yeah, and the last time Ty Beard was "in touch," it ended in a less than optimal outcome. The Weebwarriors here will get the joke.

I would not stake your hope on anything involving a connection with Tyrone Percy Beard.

That said, I hope Nick has alternate connections, and he gets his channel back. This whole thing is fucked. I'm tired of this deplatforming shit.
One can only hope it's due the case involving anime.
>Andrew Tate terminated
>SNEAKO terminated
>Nick Rekieta terminated


Why does YouTube dislike fun and entertaining?
Because they full of sad and malding people that abuse their power in order to feel like they are badasses when they clearly are not. That, and they are grifting, masculine influencers that would make people think twice about drinking the troonshine.
 
Ty Beard is not an attorney I would want anywhere near this case, because I would like it to have at least some chance of success and that fat fuck has proven himself to be lazy and utterly incompetent.
I'm only mentioning him as a way to get Ken Paxton aware of it. HB20 lets the Texas AG sue on behalf of users.
 
Virtually all tech platforms run at a loss. The revenue model for Silicon Valley is not to generate profit through actual selling of goods or services, but to expand the userbase to attract more VC investment.

Besides, YouTube's value to Google/Alphabet is not strictly monetary.
I knew about this, but I've never thought about it very hard.
So how does that work, exactly? Feel free to simplify since I'm just an internet retard.
Let's say I'm an investor, and I put in $X.
How does Google pay me if it runs youtube at even a minor loss?
Because if I get burned on this investment, I'd make sure everyone in my community (people who would most likely be fellow venture capital investors) knew that I got burned hard by Google, and that they should take their money elsewhere.
Does it pay me from the next set of investors? I know that only works for so long, and it's only legal until someone realizes what's happening. I know Google's pretty buddy buddy with the Feds so punishment for that wouldn't happen unless someone important got burned, if that's the case.
I am very, very sorry that you have to deal with this retarded set of questions.
 
Last edited:
Back