Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[TheDarknessGrows]

Troons: "We're the victims of a KF harassment campaign!"

Most Farmers and Null: "No, you're not. You're merely being laughed at for the stupid shit you say and do. STFU."

2022 Pink Triangle Retards: "We need to campaign against Keffals!"

The first group is worse, but the third is hardly helping matters.

The third group should go up on the wall. Don't specify by year though, I saw a 2014 pink triangle.

 

[JoeyJoJo]

View attachment 3718255
Nick's channel has been terminated

It's amazing how much bullshit these people can get away with, A mass flagging campaign that they are bragging about and yet Nick is punished. Disgusting

 

[AnOminous]

More investment signals "hey, this is a stock that's going places!" which raises the value of the stock which means higher dividend payments, which draws more VC investment.

If you're asking, "how is that viable in the long term?" well, it's not. It's literally a repeat of the 90's Dot Com bubble. But this time around there's even more money being thrown around, and it's allowed these companies to acquire and wield significant power that affects the rest of us.

Honestly society would be better off sucking up the economic hit and burning this shit all to the ground.

 

[Captain Manning]

Hey I've got a bit of a weird question for those of you who haven't denounced YouTube entirely but were previously subscribed to Nick.

I am not subscribed to Law&Crime, I do not interact with the channel in the slightest. However, this morning I got a recommendation for the channel as a push notification sent to my phone. I don't get these very often, so seeing it did stand out to me. This left a sour taste in my mouth because I know they were assblasted about Nick using their streams of court cases and making crazy $ off of it.

This might seem far-fetched but I'm wondering if there's more to this than just the trannies, because that feels a little too on the nose. Did anyone else experience something similar, or am I just being retarded over a coincidence?

Given the track record of L&C as well as YouTube shills doing strange shit, I don't want to write off the possibility that more bad actors have been involved.

I don't think you're retarded, but I doubt L&C was involved.

Reason is I got recommendations for L&C long before Rekieta got yeeted. I think that's just the algo realizing I watch a lot of legal shit.

Leagle Eagle is another one they kept trying to shill to me. As well as some other lawtuber channels (many rather conservative, and therefore "wrongthink.").

I am no fan of L&C, and they probably have cause to celebrate today, but I think the current faggotry lies at the feet of the troons mass reporting. It's also the simplest explaination.

 

[Happy Fish]

It's amazing how much bullshit these people can get away with, A mass flagging campaign that they are bragging about and yet Nick is punished. Disgusting

We are on a completely legitimate site where the corporate world backed out of protection service in support of cybercrime against it.

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

wtf youtube just smited legal vice's stream just now

:edit stream is back. weird week.

 

[Retink Retunk]

I need to sperg a little on the idea of "Youtube losing money", because that's a psyop at this point. The records showing that Youtube loses money are a decade old now and they were saying Youtube was losing something like 174 million a year:

But at the same time a bit later Youtube is handing out 25 million to TYT alone and in total 300 million. The loss, if any is purely artificial:

Now, consider that Youtube continues to grow and has made almost 29 billion in revenue in 2021, and there's no way that they're operating at any kind of real loss, and it's impossible to find anything from recent years that point that the branch is operating at a loss, with most sources claiming it's profitable or at the very worst break even currently despite them burning hundreds of millions to feed cockroaches like TYT:

Basically what I'm getting at is the whole "Youtube runs at a loss" thing is a psy-op engineered to make you support globohomo more. They're not operating at a loss, they're not some victim, they're assholes who know how to tug on your heartstrings and make you believe it's oh so hard to compete with them while they rake in billions.

 

[Meat Target]

wtf youtube just smited legal vice's stream just now

View attachment 3720136

Night of the Clipped Dicks

 

[Throwing Romans]

wtf youtube just smited legal vice's stream just now

View attachment 3720136

Looks like he's back now. Apparently he was just showing another youtube channel's videos.

 

[F_Break]

I need to sperg a little on the idea of "Youtube losing money", because that's a psyop at this point. The records showing that Youtube loses money are a decade old now and they were saying Youtube was losing something like 174 million a year:
View attachment 3720129


But at the same time a bit later Youtube is handing out 25 million to TYT alone and in total 300 million. The loss, if any is purely artificial:
View attachment 3720125

Now, consider that Youtube continues to grow and has made almost 29 billion in revenue in 2021, and there's no way that they're operating at any kind of real loss, and it's impossible to find anything from recent years that point that the branch is operating at a loss, with most sources claiming it's profitable or at the very worst break even currently despite them burning hundreds of millions to feed cockroaches like TYT:
View attachment 3720135


Basically what I'm getting at is the whole "Youtube runs at a loss" thing is a psy-op engineered to make you support globohomo more. They're not operating at a loss, they're not some victim, they're assholes who know how to tug on your heartstrings and make you believe it's oh so hard to compete with them while they rake in billions.

Even if YouTube operated at a loss, their parent company (Alphabet) doesn't so they can afford to eat those losses anyway.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Basically what I'm getting at is the whole "Youtube runs at a loss" thing is a psy-op engineered to make you support globohomo more. They're not operating at a loss, they're not some victim, they're assholes who know how to tug on your heartstrings and make you believe it's oh so hard to compete with them while they rake in billions.

The people for whom Youtube is operated are the same people who can have money printed whenever they want. The profitability of Youtube is a red herring. The scum that profit off Youtube's operations don't want money, they want to control your thoughts.

 

[whatever I feel like]

Night of the Clipped Dicks

Night of the Living Dead flesh grafted onto a troon's pee-slot.

 

[Hepativore]

Night of the Living Dead flesh grafted onto a troon's pee-slot.

Night of the Bore Holes?

 

[Sprocket]

Rekieta is on stream with Megan Fox right now. In case there's anyone unaware.

The RumbleStream: Troon Squad Silencing Opposition with Big Tech's Help

WTF YouTube? Nick Rekieta has been yeeted off the platform due to the whining of a bunch of weirdos. I've had enough. Help me migrate my YT channel to Rumble

rumble.com

 

[Sperglord666]

I need to sperg a little on the idea of "Youtube losing money", because that's a psyop at this point. The records showing that Youtube loses money are a decade old now and they were saying Youtube was losing something like 174 million a year:
View attachment 3720129


But at the same time a bit later Youtube is handing out 25 million to TYT alone and in total 300 million. The loss, if any is purely artificial:
View attachment 3720125

Now, consider that Youtube continues to grow and has made almost 29 billion in revenue in 2021, and there's no way that they're operating at any kind of real loss, and it's impossible to find anything from recent years that point that the branch is operating at a loss, with most sources claiming it's profitable or at the very worst break even currently despite them burning hundreds of millions to feed cockroaches like TYT:
View attachment 3720135


Basically what I'm getting at is the whole "Youtube runs at a loss" thing is a psy-op engineered to make you support globohomo more. They're not operating at a loss, they're not some victim, they're assholes who know how to tug on your heartstrings and make you believe it's oh so hard to compete with them while they rake in billions.

Thank you! I've explained this multiple times in other places on the internet and no one can seem to get their head that Google does not release the profit/loss on Youtube itself. As far as I'm concerned, if they choose to keep Youtube within the Google machine and that machine is profitable as a whole, Youtube is part of that profit. If you don't buy that, then keep in mind that Google has always uthlessly gutted services with no notice when they proved unprofitable. Youtube obviously has value if they've chose to keep it around this long.

Stop believing billionaires that complain about how broke they are.

 

[A Sunset]

The people for whom Youtube is operated are the same people who can have money printed whenever they want. The profitability of Youtube is a red herring. The scum that profit off Youtube's operations don't want money, they want to control your thoughts.

Just like twitter. Remeber when Elon Musk looked into the company and it came out that they'd been operating at a loss for years, and that it was more about the control and dissemination of certain viewpoints and political information?

What a shock that two massive platforms that control public discource especially politically, YouTube and Twitter, are permanently non-profitable yet are propped up by leftist corportations. And what a coincidence that Nick Rekieta was banned off both of them in quick succession, after getting in a spat with Keffals who openly stated the Youtube team was supporting him in the algorithm.

REEEEEEEEALY makes you think.

 

[Captain Manning]

Honestly society would be better off sucking up the economic hit and burning this shit all to the ground.

I've honestly fantasized about the government using eminent domain to seize the basic infrastructure of the Internet and declare it a public utility.

I know that's anathema to the idea privatization is good and nationalization is bad, but even the right is starting to realize big woke tech is slowly destroying the village square. That's why you got that Texas law. Something has to give. The center cannot hold.

As Keffals demonstrated with us, this isn't even just about specific corporate social media platforms anymore. We're beyond Twitter and YouTube now. They are, or soon will be, going after the backbone. I fear a world where nobody will allowed to plug anything into the Internet without some literal faggot in Palo Alto giving it their blessing.

 

[Danone]

"I'M MAD AND APPALLED THAT YOUTUBE WOULD DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS TO A SMALL CREATOR. THEY SHOULD GET THEIR SHIT TOGETHER. #WTHYT. Anyway, subscribe to my channel and my podcast. Sub to me on Twitch and donate because we're all a family and I'm your friend and I... am... out."

 

[6MillionCoofs]

I need to sperg a little on the idea of "Youtube losing money", because that's a psyop at this point. The records showing that Youtube loses money are a decade old now and they were saying Youtube was losing something like 174 million a year:
View attachment 3720129


But at the same time a bit later Youtube is handing out 25 million to TYT alone and in total 300 million. The loss, if any is purely artificial:
View attachment 3720125

Now, consider that Youtube continues to grow and has made almost 29 billion in revenue in 2021, and there's no way that they're operating at any kind of real loss, and it's impossible to find anything from recent years that point that the branch is operating at a loss, with most sources claiming it's profitable or at the very worst break even currently despite them burning hundreds of millions to feed cockroaches like TYT:
View attachment 3720135


Basically what I'm getting at is the whole "Youtube runs at a loss" thing is a psy-op engineered to make you support globohomo more. They're not operating at a loss, they're not some victim, they're assholes who know how to tug on your heartstrings and make you believe it's oh so hard to compete with them while they rake in billions.

How is anyone that ever brings up ‘youtube makes no money’ supporting globbohomo. Everyone that says it makes no money always follows by saying ‘making money does not matter because that is not the point’. It’s litterally being anti globo?

It is hsrd to compete with them, even if they weren’t racking in billions. Them racking in billions makes it even harder

 

[Associate Rick]

Night of the Bore Holes?

Dawn of the dilators