- Joined
- Jan 30, 2021
A bubble then?Virtually all tech platforms run at a loss. The revenue model for Silicon Valley is not to generate profit through actual selling of goods or services, but to expand the userbase to attract more VC investment
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A bubble then?Virtually all tech platforms run at a loss. The revenue model for Silicon Valley is not to generate profit through actual selling of goods or services, but to expand the userbase to attract more VC investment
Normally a company does this by paying dividends. But a company can also indirectly pay you if you buy a share at $X and their share price later goes up to $Y. Then you've made $(Y-X) profit. That assumes the share price goes up, though.Let's say I'm an investor, and I put in $X.
How does Google pay me if it runs youtube at even a minor loss?
Yeah, well, if you build something whose sole job is pattern recognition, you shouldn't be annoyed when it recognizes patterns. But then we wouldn't have tons of books* and articles specifically saying AI is racist/sexist/whateverist and we need to "train it better".It's almost like the AI is trying to tell them that globohomo isn't the way to go.
It's all very reminiscent of the south sea bubble situation.More investment signals "hey, this is a stock that's going places!" which raises the value of the stock which means higher dividend payments, which draws more VC investment.
If you're asking, "how is that viable in the long term?" well, it's not. It's literally a repeat of the 90's Dot Com bubble. But this time around there's even more money being thrown around, and it's allowed these companies to acquire and wield significant power that affects the rest of us.
I agree.Alphabet will never let go of YouTube.
Apparently the bubble is close to bursting as Facebook (or rather Meta) and other Silicon Valley giants have issued a hiring freeze and are even looking to weed out their staff for lazy employers. Hopefully this means the danger heads and axe wounds get the boot.A bubble then?
Running at a loss doesn't mean the business is actually incapable of returning a profit. In anything business related you can be making a ton of money but you can be operating at a loss because of things like depreciation and reinvestment. There are also benefits to showing a loss on the balance sheet, such as taxes, but also in Youtubes case it's much harder to sue them for say copyright infringement because well they're running at a loss in legal terms even if they're making money when you take out all of the financial bullshit.Doesn't it run a massive loss?
Troons: "We're the victims of a KF harassment campaign!"Tempting as that might be, we are not the Autistic Illuminati.
You only need to look at Google itself, they closed not only Stadia but also their laptop business and other services almost out of nowhere.Apparently the bubble is close to bursting as Facebook (or rather Meta) and other Silicon Valley giants have issued a hiring freeze and are even looking to weed out their staff for lazy employers. Hopefully this means the danger heads and axe wounds get the boot.
And who knows what happens with Twitter now that Musk owns it. I expect a heavy restructuring of the company. Musk himself said he wants to make Twitter a basically one in all product. Interesting times ahead
Much like the SJW and Anti-SJW crowd. Just look at Gamergate, Comicsgate and Weeb Wars. At this point it's better to not have a stake in either side.Troons: "We're the victims of a KF harassment campaign!"
Most Farmers and Null: "No, you're not. You're merely being laughed at for the stupid shit you say and do. STFU."
2022 Pink Triangle Retards: "We need to campaign against Keffals!"
The first group is worse, but the third is hardly helping matters.
Speaking of "soviet way of doing things".Very soviet way of doing things. Everyone is guilty we just don't know what they are guilty of yet.
I know, I was daydreaming.Google is not going to sell a platform that makes 0 money that they bought solely to monopolise video content creating and hosting
MEIGH GET ME MUH FUCKIN' ENEMY LIST, DIS DAMN WHORE CALLED ME A PAEDO AND SAID I'M FAT!
View attachment 3720100
It's not a coincidence. The Keffals shit is being used as justification but you have several factions that were working together (including activist employees within Google/YouTube) behind the scenes in order to give YouTube enough cover and justification to finally pull the trigger for real. The biggest mistake a lot of the cancelled make is getting smug and complacent when the early deplatforming attempts fail. These people never stop and the activist employees within these are playing the long game even if the foot soldiers are completely retarded. L&C tried and failed to demonetize his channel with spurious DMCA claims so the activists within YouTube had to wait until he got mass flagged for showing a violent clip to give him a strike. I'm sure YouTube was giddy when he started talking about Keffals because more strikes via mass flagging were guaranteed.Hey I've got a bit of a weird question for those of you who haven't denounced YouTube entirely but were previously subscribed to Nick.
I am not subscribed to Law&Crime, I do not interact with the channel in the slightest. However, this morning I got a recommendation for the channel as a push notification sent to my phone. I don't get these very often, so seeing it did stand out to me. This left a sour taste in my mouth because I know they were assblasted about Nick using their streams of court cases and making crazy $ off of it.
This might seem far-fetched but I'm wondering if there's more to this than just the trannies, because that feels a little too on the nose. Did anyone else experience something similar, or am I just being retarded over a coincidence?
Given the track record of L&C as well as YouTube shills doing strange shit, I don't want to write off the possibility that more bad actors have been involved.
It always weirds me out how many aware and non-insane people not only use but heavily rely on the major platforms without a backup already in line. Like, if a company (or agency) repeatedly sides with the insane why are you so complacent you think shit is never going to hit the fan? Is normalcy bias really just that great of a drug?It's not a coincidence. The Keffals shit is being used as justification but you have several factions that were working together (including activist employees within Google/YouTube) behind the scenes in order to give YouTube enough cover and justification to finally pull the trigger for real. The biggest mistake a lot of the cancelled make is getting smug and complacent when the early deplatforming attempts fail. These people never stop and the activist employees within these are playing the long game even if the foot soldiers are completely retarded. L&C tried and failed to demonetize his channel with spurious DMCA claims so the activists within YouTube had to wait until he got mass flagged for showing a violent clip to give him a strike. I'm sure YouTube was giddy when he started talking about Keffals because more strikes via mass flagging were guaranteed.