Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just say "victory" and "treachery", faggot.
It's not going to kill you to learn languages other than English and Urdu, you know.

I got a joke. How do you fit the entire Ukrainian army in a Humvee?
Zaluzhny in the front, Zelensky in the back, and one million Ukrainian soldiers and NATO mercenaries in the ashtray.
 
If Russia launches nukes then Ukraine will launch a Gay Bomb.
But who has control of the Nude Bomb?
thenudebomb.jpg
 
Too late, the last gay bomb was detonated over America in 2015 to celebrate Obama's second term.


In other words you don't know that zrada always follows peremoga.

What's your winning scenario here? If the west floods Ukraine with more mercenaries and they keep trying to take more territory, then they'll promptly turn into a radioactive pile of ashes. NATO has already proclaimed they will not respond unless attacked directly, so as long as the nuclear strike is restricted to Ukrainian territory, there will be no retaliation, and no refunds. There's no way for Ukraine to win here, other than promptly surrendering. SDAVAYSA KHOKHOL! AHKMAT SILA!
And we are back to nuclear shitposting

:semperfidelis:

Ever consider that when you keep tying victory to the appearance of mushroom clouds, you aren't in the best of positions?

Nichevo always follows the failure of khvastovstvo. Or the failure of any Russian endeavor. Which, for any Russian endeavor not involving over a trillion dollars in American largesse (today's value of the American supplies sent to Russia 1942-1945), is every Russian endeavor
 
Last edited:
And we are back to nuclear shitposting

:semperfidelis:

Nichevo always follows the failure of maskirovka. Or the failure of any Russian endeavor. Which, for any Russian endeavor not involving over a trillion dollars in American largesse (today's value of the American supplies sent to Russia 1942-1945), is every Russian endeavor
No, no. Come on. Tell me how you envision a scenario of Ukraine "winning" and NOT getting nuked.
 
Ukrainian soldier scores a wallbang
No, no. Come on. Tell me how you envision a scenario of Ukraine "winning" and NOT getting nuked.
Easy. The strategic rocket forces refuse to carry out the order. The political leadership already fucked the military by sending them to die repeatedly in offensive actions that made no military sense but were driven by political goals. Including troops from the very own strategic rocket forces and sailors from the navy who were "voluntold" to serve in Ukraine as infantry or tank drivers to plug the manpower gaps.
Under no circumstances is the military going to obey the order to end the world and die for a manlet who can't take the L.
 
Russians evacuated Kherson schoolchildren to Crimea until October 21, they are most likely expecting the city to be taken over soon.
1665086850313.png
 
Easy. The strategic rocket forces refuse to carry out the order. The political leadership already fucked the military by sending them to die repeatedly in offensive actions that made no military sense but were driven by political goals. Including troops from the very own strategic rocket forces and sailors from the navy who were "voluntold" to serve in Ukraine as infantry or tank drivers to plug the manpower gaps.
Under no circumstances is the military going to obey the order to end the world and die for a manlet who can't take the L.
So you're basing your entire theory on the assumption that someone will refuse an order? We already know that NATO won't respond to a nuclear strike unless it is directly on a NATO member nation, so your whole "end of the world" situation goes out of the window. Pretty pathetic, if you ask me.
 
So it should be easy for you to describe, then. Go ahead. Tell me how Ukraine can win and not get nuked in return. What steps can they take to accomplish that?
Ukraine continues winning on the battlefield, nuclear weapons do not get used. There

Do you realize you sound like you're on some kind of hardcore stimulant?

IF: X, THEN: MUSHROOM CLOUDS ARE DEFINITELY HABBENING PROVE ME WRONG

I assume you're aware of the logical fallacy known as "the impossibility of proving a negative"

Once again the burden of proof is on you, claiming that nuclear weapons will 100% be used if Russia continues to lose. Vague, imprecise remarks by Vlad daddy are your proof. We have seen numerous identical remarks before from Russians. They were bluff and bluster then. I assert they are again now. I have no reason to believe your assertion they are not
 
Last edited:
Ukraine continues winning on the battlefield, nuclear weapons do not get used. There

Do you realize you sound like you're on some kind of hardcore stimulant?
What makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do you think this is a movie, and that Ukraine has plot armor? Zelensky just threatened nuclear war, AGAIN.

You do realize that using a nuclear weapon will not automatically trigger MAD, right? That's a fucking retarded idea. NATO will pretend nothing happened and will go about its business, rather than risking a retaliation strike that will end the world.
 
What makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do

The United States has already given Russia a red line on chemical or nuclear weapons. NATO countries would consider any radioactive fallout blowing across the border to be a reason to declare article 5.
 
What makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do you think this is a movie, and that Ukraine has plot armor?
What makes you think they will? Ukraine takes back the territory that Russia stole from it by force of arms. How does that, in any way at all, justify using nukes?

Even a tactical nuclear strike in Ukraine would send a radiation cloud across Europe that far exceeds anything put out by Chernobyl. You honestly believe that they wouldn't retaliate?
 
So you're basing your entire theory on the assumption that someone will refuse an order? We already know that NATO won't respond to a nuclear strike unless it is directly on a NATO member nation, so your whole "end of the world" situation goes out of the window. Pretty pathetic, if you ask me.
Soviet officers already made the decision to not fire nukes at least twice during the Cold War. We're only talking here because most people who work with nukes know how fucking stupid it is to launch them.
And the US already said they would respond to a nuclear weapon with a conventional strike. Anyone carrying out an order to fire a nuke knows that Russian assets, if not Russian soil, will suffer a reprisal attack which then could spiral into a nuclear attack on US/NATO.
It's not pathetic. It's real life. Your theory hinges on the Russian military leadership, who understand the applicability of their own nuclear doctrine, to obey a man who is willing to destroy Russia over his ego.
 
What makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do you think this is a movie, and that Ukraine has plot armor? Zelensky just threatened nuclear war, AGAIN.

You do realize that using a nuclear weapon will not automatically trigger MAD, right? That's a fucking retarded idea. NATO will pretend nothing happened and will go about its business, rather than risking a retaliation strike that will end the world.
I say you're blustering

That I do not believe said bluster

What qualifications do you, seething anonymous internet shitposter, possess that would make me change my mind?

So, that is that

A bluff

Unless...

...Retarded monkey, is that you? Vlad daddy?

...If so, I am honored of course, but sir,
shouldn't you be running the war instead of seething and shitposting on a gossip webzone?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back