Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 97 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 157 40.3%

  • Total voters
    390
The circus of this shit should be utterly humiliating for companies like Cloudflare and YouTube. Imagine being a serious shareholder of either and hearing extremely conflicting statements + seeing extremely conflicting actions. "Oh a lawyer with half a million subs got banned? Must be a good reason for it. Wait, they're already unbanned?" "Oh, they're not banning this controversial site? Must have a good reason for it. Wait, they're already banned?" lol, just the necksnap.
I wonder if shareholders can start suing these companies for this kind of bullshit, considering banning large clients is a great way to lose money.
 
However, he's an egomaniac, he'll take credit for everything and is obsessed with being the centre of attention, he keeps bigging himself up and trying to take all the attention, fucking over even other Trannies, so ultimately he's slowly gonna ruin his reputation as people realise how much of an awful fucking person he is.
A person like him will eventually be exposed for what he really is. He deserves nothing less than to return to the world of fake fart porn.
 
They are not going to stop at one attempt.

He/Anyone should take this opportunity to move as many people over to Rumble as possible now, not just go back to youtube pretending things will be okay and never happen again.
That's his plan. He's aiming to just use youtube for viewer-gathering (however the fuck he does that), and use Rumble as his main streaming service.

Also per his stream, revealing the addresses of the 45 Keffals orbiters is on hold indefinitely.
 
He said something about using YouTube for clips, so maybe the YT channel will be like an official clips channel, sort of like what Sam Hyde is doing.
“KEFFALS! I’M GONNA SUE YOU!”
“As a bit, right?”
“NOOOO, IN REAL LIFE! SERVED AT YOUR HOUSE!”
 
Also per his stream, revealing the addresses of the 45 Keffals orbiters is on hold indefinitely.
Cuck Retarda of Recucka Law cowers in fear to the axewound, will he grow a pair of balls and call out the flaggot groomers, or will he save his precious Jewtube channel and let it go like a buckbroken niggerboy who mouthed off to massuh? Find out next time on Kiwiball Z
 
I wonder if shareholders can start suing these companies for this kind of bullshit, considering banning large clients is a great way to lose money.
shareholders are clueless boomers, just as lawmakers are clueless boomers. No one is wrangling these tech industry retards and the culture they have fostered inside these companies.
 
Legal Mindset (Andrew) just called out one of the snakes live "Lady Rackets has done more for Nick than Law & Lumber"
Does not surprise me, he was kind of snooty during the Depp trial. I remember Rekieta had to come in and tell L&L and DUI Guy to stop beefing over DUI Guy reacting in the courtroom. It was a valid point to make, but L&L and Bytes made it a huge deal in such a mean girl way. Eyeroll.
 
Does not surprise me, he was kind of snooty during the Depp trial. I remember Rekieta had to come in and tell L&L and DUI Guy to stop beefing over DUI Guy reacting in the courtroom. It was a valid point to make, but L&L and Bytes made it a huge deal in such a mean girl way. Eyeroll.
nick finding out the treacherous seas of trying to have internet friends not melt down at each other

i guess people act like that in real life too
 
Cuck Retarda of Recucka Law cowers in fear to the axewound, will he grow a pair of balls and call out the flaggot groomers, or will he save his precious Jewtube channel and let it go like a buckbroken niggerboy who mouthed off to massuh? Find out next time on Kiwiball Z
Joined Aug 12, 2022
Reaction score -423

Opinion discarded.
 

“And thou, lucas, shalt see that no theme may be played that hath not its uttermost source in me, nor can any alter the music in my despite. For he that attempteth this shall prove but mine instrument in the devising of things more wonderful, which he himself hath not imagined.”​

- Quoting from the Music of the Penor (the Inugriftallday), the first book of the Shillformillions.
 
Then why unban him in the first place?
It's because of that new Texas law. Personally, I don't think it'll hold up in appeals and they probably think the same, but the cost of being the one to take it to the SC will be extraordinary. Why rush to do that when you can hold back and let twitter or facebook or tiktok take the hit instead?
 
It's because of that new Texas law. Personally, I don't think it'll hold up in appeals and they probably think the same, but the cost of being the one to take it to the SC will be extraordinary. Why rush to do that when you can hold back and let twitter or facebook or tiktok take the hit instead?
I have a hunch that it was a combination of a couple things. I think he said on his Rumble stream the day he was yeeted that he had been keeping records of the boasting and talking about flagging him off of YT since the 2nd strike. Thee fact he is a lawyer, I would assume it was presented in a way that was compelling, even if he had to do it in a hurry at the last minute.

I also think the Texas law was a factor, in that, I don't think Google/YT wanted to have to use his case as a test case against that law. He would have had proof that it was caused by a campaign against him, targeted and coordinated; was against the YT terms of service; and that YT knew all of this and still went along with it.

I think there is/was no way they wanted to have that be the case presented against them as the first case against that law, and I think everything lined up for the Texas AG to take it on. They would much rather prefer some smaller channel, who doesn't have proof that being kicked off was caused by TOS breaking activities and no legal background to be preparing for it for that long.

This isn't an change of heart or good deed by Google/YT, they are scum. This was a cover there own ass move. If Nick is correct, and they removed the 2nd strike, then they removed the one from when he says Lucas should get on the wall but kept it on the last one which is a much weaker strike, IMO.

He still gets 2 weeks suspension, but they don't have to deal with the Texas Law in any meaningful way, yet.
 
but the cost of being the one to take it to the SC will be extraordinary
The law let's either the user or the Texas AG sue on the users behalf, and Nick has connections in Texas. So it's not out of the realm of possibility that Texas will sue for him. Nick even mentioned bringing it to Ken Paxton's attention during the post-ban stream.
 
I have a hunch that it was a combination of a couple things. I think he said on his Rumble stream the day he was yeeted that he had been keeping records of the boasting and talking about flagging him off of YT since the 2nd strike. Thee fact he is a lawyer, I would assume it was presented in a way that was compelling, even if he had to do it in a hurry at the last minute.

I also think the Texas law was a factor, in that, I don't think Google/YT wanted to have to use his case as a test case against that law. He would have had proof that it was caused by a campaign against him, targeted and coordinated; was against the YT terms of service; and that YT knew all of this and still went along with it.

I think there is/was no way they wanted to have that be the case presented against them as the first case against that law, and I think everything lined up for the Texas AG to take it on. They would much rather prefer some smaller channel, who doesn't have proof that being kicked off was caused by TOS breaking activities and no legal background to be preparing for it for that long.

This isn't an change of heart or good deed by Google/YT, they are scum. This was a cover there own ass move. If Nick is correct, and they removed the 2nd strike, then they removed the one from when he says Lucas should get on the wall but kept it on the last one which is a much weaker strike, IMO.

He still gets 2 weeks suspension, but they don't have to deal with the Texas Law in any meaningful way, yet.
I wonder if they think they could get a certain Texas lawyer to completely drop the ball again. I have my doubts Nik would even use that Lawyer. I just wonder if that is what YT is thinking
 
  • Winner
Reactions: ChromaQuack
Back