Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Divine right to rule]

These eunuchs want what? Some kind of homogenous newspeak and thought?

No, they want everyone to be forced to respect their delusion on gunpoint, and everyone who refuses to be either killed or put in gulags.
I am not kidding.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Real talk, when is drex going to have nick on his channel?

 

[heathercho]

But they also all had their start and growth on youtube, though in some cases like Salty Cracker he still has a channel and has uploaded to it as recently as 12 hours ago: https://www.youtube.com/c/SaltyCracker/videos

But here's the other thing, Nick is bigger than any of them, and he's kind of a normie. That last part is very important.

He's had it suspended many times + he doesn't stream his full streams on there. He doesn't rely on it. That's the thing.
Unlike Nick, he planned ahead : Cut off the stream midway before any spice and tell people to head over to alt-tech.
He's completely de-monetized on YT.
Besides, in reality, Salty Cracker's audience would have come from /TheDonald, not randoms on YT.

Not to mention : Nick is only "bigger" than them, because he has fly-bys coming in to watch the trials.
Yeah, he'll lose out on those filthy YT casuals, but who cares? They aren't the ones sending him superberries.
They aren't the ones giving him sponsorships. His core base is going to be who watches his late night drunk streams.
No one with half a brain watches any ads on YT. They use Brave or Vanced and skip all the ads. His core audience who paypig and superberry him will just follow him wherever he goes. That's evident by his numbers on Rumble post-yeet.
Those people though, are going to have to learn that they're now the unclean too. It's no longer just conspiracy theorists, truthers, Trumptards, Qtards, Kiwifarms, TERFS and Ethan Ralph that are no longer desirable on these platforms. It's them too.

Unless they capitulate and take the troon dick, deeper and deeper, coz it never ends, they'll be as internet homeless as everyone else, unless they go over to other platforms.
Nick going over to Rumble will only help to grow others. I hope he doesn't cuck out when he gets reinstated on YT and forget the importance of alt-platforms. If (which is likely) that he gets reinstated, then I hope he adopts a push-towards other platforms approach, rather than just going back to reliance on YT.
People need to forget this idea that YT is this be-all-to-end-all. It doesn't want 70% of its content creators on there, it wants them dead and gone.

 

[Elmo]

People need to forget this idea that YT is this be-all-to-end-all. It doesn't want 70% of its content creators on there, it wants them dead and gone.

YouTube Rewind is really all you need to know about what kind of content and "audience" they want on the platform.

 

[FILTH Tourist]

They simply want to watch the world burn and be the cause of it. These are peak sadomasochists that only want misery onto themselves and others in the process.

Nah, burning the world is too much excitement for them. They want to kill us though entropy. They want to end humanity by sapping us of out of ambition, desire for freedom, and critical thinking and letting us rot blissfully on this planet.

 

[Pargon]

Nah wasn't spam, reasonable pace. Banned for saying 'nigger' ironically as Nick was talking about 'the alt tech nigger problem' admin gave nick $25 bucks earlier and was probably in chat playing janny as best I can tell.

Appeal it how? There is nothing I can find in the UI, there is no email or notification, just can't comment or chat at all on the whole platform.

I'm not going to go register for a twitter give those troons my real name and spend hours @ing some PR account begging for review. I already made a new account. I am gonna use my limited reach to warn people that they aren't what they say they are though. These people are billing themselves as supposed safe havens for the likes of Null and Jim and their audiences. I learned yesterday that they are full of shit like The Lemon Emperor and Brit-Chute before them.

people who want every website to be like 2006 4chan are so fucking pathetic

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Watching this Jew lawyer kvetch about this not being a death threat for the past couple weeks was pretty funny.

Why is your interpretation the correct one?

 

[Make Anime Illegal]

Watching this Jew lawyer kvetch about this not being a death threat for the past couple weeks was pretty funny.

Even the worst possible interpretation of what he said isn't a death threat. "X should be killed" is not a threat. "I'm going to kill X" is. Do you think saying a murderer should get the death penalty is a "death threat?"

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Even the worst possible interpretation of what he said isn't a death threat. "X should be killed" is not a threat. "I'm going to kill X" is. Do you think saying a murderer should get the death penalty is a "death threat?"

Ah, but murders aren't a protected caste. Transsexuals are.

You aren't even allowed to say you wouldn't fuck a transsexual, or that you don't find them sexually appealing. Anything they want, all the time. That's the standard. That means if you express the opinion that you wouldn't do something that they might want to do, like fuck them, you're inherently in the wrong and being bigoted and must be silenced so others might not share this hateful viewpoint.

 

[Slap47]

The greatest weakness of the rightwing press is their inability to report on issues like this. Probably one of the largest socially conservative channels ever has been banned and they say effectively nothing.

 

[Throwing Romans]

The greatest weakness of the rightwing press is their inability to report on issues like this. Probably one of the largest socially conservative channels ever has been banned and they say effectively nothing. being controlled by the kikes

fixed this for you

 

[Telemeter]

I don't know exact metrics, but most of the people who do thrive are MAGA/Q related. X22, Salty Cracker etc, but they use cross platform (Odysee, Rumble, Bitchute, Foxhole, their own site etc). The amount Salty Cracker rakes in per stream isn't trivial and he only streams 3 times a week. Those movements have their own bases on the .WIN sites, on GAB, Telegram, Truth Social etc.

It's 100% possible. You have to remember too, those people have long been kicked off YT, off Twitter, FB, Reddit etc. This isn't new to them. But it is likely "new" to Nick's audience. As the censorship gets broader, they'll start yeeting more normal creators and more people will just go over to other platforms.

I'm really having a hard time even staying on youtube now, its pretty much all MSM shit and coonsumer content that i don't care about (Pretty much the entire FNT group, please stop recommending them to me, I've been checked out of Hollywood for years and that includes bitching about Hollywood) from the independent creators. Everyone else is so afraid they might say the wrong joke it's just boring to listen to.

Really getting to the point that I just turn on the local TV channel to have some noise in the background as a default, because at least I'm mildly interested in the weather forecast around here and the talking heads are just about as edgy as the people still on Youtube.

The best thing about Youtube these days are the video tutorials for how to do an oil change and other practical DIY stuff.

 

[Narr Then]

this is interesting to me because it illustrates keffals paranoia. there are different ways to interpret what nick said, but he did not say "and shot". that is what keffals heard, but it isn't what he said. he has plausible deniability in this.

it's already been pointed out itt that the phrases "on the wall" or "up against the wall" can be interpreted any number of ways. nick clarified that it was a reference to "removing these individuals from society". someone else said they thought it referred to mugshots and / or a police line-up. someone else said it was a literary refence to the haidmaid's tale. someone else posted an urban dictionary definition of a sex act. personally, when i hear either phrase, what first comes to mind is the stop-and-frisk technique the police use to literally force suspects against a wall to search them. i know that's not what nick meant, but the fact is, people hear what they want to hear, and what they hear often reveals what they want the truth to be. keffals wants to believe that someone opposing him is a lethal threat. but it's not.

Even if he had said 'up against the wall and shot', it's still not a death threat, hate speech nor inciting violence. It's rhetorical. Or hypothetical. One of the 2. There's absolutely zero chance of it happening, or of keffals actually believing that there's the slightest chance of it happening, regardless of what he says to the contrary.

It shouldn't need plausible deniability or any of the other semantics being thrown around about it, because it's a commonly used turn of phrase, not something that is said then followed through on. Otherwise there'd be hundreds of thousands of people worldwide with kill counts like Bundy ffs.

I'm so sick of hysterical men in dresses fucking with language.

 

[Easy Peasy]

F in the chat for rackets. It's disgusting that troons have so much social currency.

I'll have to look in to his other subscription based streams and send some sheckles. The guy can be annoying as fuck, but he presents his info mostly well, and shouldn't be silenced because his not that inflammatory opinion is slightly different than someone elses

 

[12345]

This popped up in my feed today:

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Even if he had said 'up against the wall and shot', it's still not a death threat, hate speech nor inciting violence. It's rhetorical. Or hypothetical. One of the 2. There's absolutely zero chance of it happening, or of keffals actually believing that there's the slightest chance of it happening, regardless of what he says to the contrary.

It shouldn't need plausible deniability or any of the other semantics being thrown around about it, because it's a commonly used turn of phrase, not something that is said then followed through on. Otherwise there'd be hundreds of thousands of people worldwide with kill counts like Bundy ffs.

I'm so sick of hysterical men in dresses fucking with language.

That's what's so frustrating about the childish "but I didn't actually say the specific words that denote exactly what everyone understood I meant" excuse. Just own it. People have been using that euphemism ever since there've been guns and walls.

 

[TexOffender]

Chrissie did a video this morning on it.

 

[jspit2.0]

This was actually a significant point in the 5th Circuit ruling.

And, yes, anti-trust action against Alphabet, Meta, and Twitter is way overdue.

The only problem is the lolbertarians. Muh free market.

Were any of them getting tens of thousands of views during their live streams? Were they on the top charts of super chats on the platform?

The point isn't so much that Nick is special in himself, it's that if he can continue drawing those large audiences to alternative platforms for over a year, there's actual competition possible. Because remember, when Ninja went to Facebook gaming or whatever the service couldn't draw in audiences, neither could fireside or whatever it was called, and Clubhouse died as well. Odysee isn't really drawing in the numbers but Rumble is, however both are seeing more creators mirror their content on them, so as soon as one can show that you don't just die in the long term by moving there as a big name like Nick, that's a huge issue for Youtube.

One big thing to also look out for is can a creator grow an audience on one of those platforms without starting on Youtube. As in, can some rando just make an account, and actually be a success.

Nick got lucky on YT with the Vic/Rittenhouse stuff. He'll still be fine if he can keep even a tenth of his audience somewhere else.

But that Tube channel was worth a fortune and YT just nuked it without any fanfare. There's something deeply sick about that.

As to whether a anybody can just build themselves on these other platforms? I don't know. Something tells me it would be extremely difficult. But part of the problem is that most of these people aren't any good entertainment wise.

There are very few drama channels on the level of Jarbo the Hutt, KillallPedos, and DamePesos. Most of these people sit in a game chair and stair at a web cam while reading a Farms thread.

 

[Yourmissingsock]

people who want every website to be like 2006 4chan are so fucking pathetic

2006 4chan had a serious problem with CP.

I stopped using 4chan because of this.

Admittedly 2006 was before the really had the imagine hashing to filter out known images technology figured out but moderation is absolutely required.

 

[JustWant2PlayVidya]

Rackets is up on rumble rn covering the Darrell Brooks trial