Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.8%

  • Total voters
    353
Prince's rapid 180 after praising free speech lends credence to the idea that something big beyond any one company's control cleared its throat to provoke this action. My colleagues have a gut feeling that some troon-sympathetic mid-level (or higher) manager at Visa/MC caught wind of this shitstorm who had enough influence convince his masters to threaten to block CF's credit card processing if they didn't take action.
This theory has been raised a lot in regards to major platforms pulling even moderately disagreeable content. It feels like there's this kind of malaise hanging over these spaces because some faceless, nameless, unknown entity in the shadows wants something gone and then it is made gone. It would be game changing to actually know for sure from where and what level these directives are coming.
 
I don't get why people are getting this mad over Nick Rekieta getting banned. I think some of the VODs from his channel are lost, which sucks don't get me wrong, but whatever. I also don't get why people here are saying they'll stop using Youtube and go to dogshit sites like Odyssee or Rumble. What is the point of that? To hurt Youtube's revenues? So what, even if Youtube stops being virtually a monopoly somehow (It won't be), what is there to gain? It is not like the aspects of culture you are unsatisfied with will change. That ship sailed long ago.

Stop being sad over this grifter losing his channel, it isn't like he was saying anything important or funny.
Who knew the most powerful Karen of them all Susan Wojcicki had a Kiwi Farms account.
 
Drex apparently blasted LegalBytes for her mild defense of Nick which I'm in agreement as it was a insulting show of support for the guy who elevated you to where you're at and you are supposedly friends with. Will be doing a stream tomorrow calling out more fair weather friends of Nick.

1665298489664.png
 
Drex apparently blasted LegalBytes for her mild defense of Nick which I'm in agreement as it was a insulting show of support for the guy who elevated you to where you're at and you are supposedly friends with. Will be doing a stream tomorrow calling out more fair weather friends of Nick.

View attachment 3725281
You know... Proudly displaying unfollowing someone is soy energy. Sorry giant black man.

It's gay when people do the same thing in Nick's youtube comments, it's gay when you do it on twitter.
 
Drex apparently blasted LegalBytes for her mild defense of Nick which I'm in agreement as it was a insulting show of support for the guy who elevated you to where you're at and you are supposedly friends with. Will be doing a stream tomorrow calling out more fair weather friends of Nick.

View attachment 3725281

Looks like Drex is planning his own Night of the Long Knives, and I'm all in for it.
 
This theory has been raised a lot in regards to major platforms pulling even moderately disagreeable content. It feels like there's this kind of malaise hanging over these spaces because some faceless, nameless, unknown entity in the shadows wants something gone and then it is made gone. It would be game changing to actually know for sure from where and what level these directives are coming.
Maybe it's someone at whatever outfit assesses each company's ESG? I doubt Larry does all that work himself.
 
Last edited:
If the DUI Guy backlash didn't happen her denouncement of Nick would have been way stronger. She is trying to fence ride and she fails to understand that people watch lawtube for their opinions. Her channel has lost 8k subs since that went down and no video has gotten over 100k views. The largest superchat amount for a stream since Depp has been $208.

She is a case study in how to fuck up a perfect opportunity.
 
Considering Legal Mindset named and shamed when the internet circled the wagons, I cannot wait for the hilarity Drex is going to drop.
Who did he name and shame?
I don't really follow any of these "lawtubers" aside from when there is a big case to cover. Apart from Rackets they just aren't interesting to listen to on normal matters.
 
Any context? I do watch this guys videos from time to time.
tl;dr during the Depp trial DUI guy and a few others got into the courtroom.
That happened and legalbytes, hoeg law, and law and lumber came out denouncing him and banning him from their streams. The claim was it was unprofessional and it blemished the 'lawtube' brand.
 
tl;dr during the Depp trial DUI guy and a few others got into the courtroom.
That happened and legalbytes, hoeg law, and law and lumber came out denouncing him and banning him from their streams. The claim was it was unprofessional and it blemished the 'lawtube' brand.
Wow that's gay as fuck. My only exposure to this drama is hearing Nick dismiss it and say he doesn't want to get involved in that shit. I get his stance now. This is retarded and petty enough to put high-school girls to shame.
 



I wouldn't be surprised if some nice Twitcher just so happened to come upon this bit of targeted harassment and reported it.
 
Back