- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
The RationalWiki quotes conspiracy theories about some of the Red Army Faction being assassinated in prison as true and quotes also conspiracy theories about the USS Liberty being attacked by Israel deliberately as fact.
Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Lol, asking that guy that. He just wants to farm as many dumb and autistic rates as he can. Something is wrong with this guy.
Moexlibu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2016
Am I stupid for not knowing who or what you mean?
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
Nail on the head, right there. Many of the older RW articles which focus on debunking and explaining fallacies are actually really good. That those have been swamped by the more recent SJW ranting is actually quite sad. But hey, where's the entertainment in well-written, balanced articles?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Maybe I was responding to your question about the actual dude you asked about?
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
Someone finally got up to upgrading the whole mess... And fucked up, of course:
Someone finally got up to upgrading the whole mess... And fucked up, of course:
Looks like they needed to rebuild the localisation cache because it's either corrupt or the attempt to upgrade farbled the data somehow.
If so, fuck it, here's the instructions if they can't figure it out for themselves:
"php rebuildlocalisationcache.php"
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
They probably won't and they won't listen to you just because you're one of those dang dirty Kiwi Gator trolls to them.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
Moexlibu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2016
Which dude would that be? Sorry, I'm a bit dense right now...
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2015
Pretty sure this isn't the fix. The error is: "Unknown table engine 'InnoDB'". This sounds deeper than some inconsistent cache rows...
I suspect this is related to some innodb_* setting such as innodb_buffer_pool_size, innodb_log_file_size, or some such, and the RW database outgrowing it. MySQL isn't very good at dealing with these sort of situations...
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
Technical fuck up, or private purge? You decide!
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
When there have been these highly suspicious user account failures, the site kept working, so that's most likely not it.
Moexlibu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2016
Gerards razor: If something can be explained by technical ineptitude or sneaky banning, assume both...
Sorte Slyngel got http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Log/vandal binned and http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Log/rights sysoprevoked for - essentially - http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Hard_green&curid=11639&diff=1636078&oldid=1636051 a single word. His attempts http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hard_green&diff=1636048&oldid=1510349 to justify http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&diff=1636073&oldid=1636005 himself fall on deaf ears...
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- (cur | prev) 02:08, 5 March 2016 Weaseloid (Talk | contribs) m . . (+
. . (Reverted edits by Sorte Slyngel (talk) to last revision by Weaseloid) (undo) - (cur | prev) 01:59, 5 March 2016 Sorte Slyngel (Talk | contribs) . . (- . . (My last undo and that's a promise. But this is just more of a statement - if you want to have false information, be my guest.) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 01:06, 5 March 2016 Weaseloid (Talk | contribs) m . . (+ . . (Reverted edits by Sorte Slyngel (talk) to last revision by Weaseloid) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 01:03, 5 March 2016 Sorte Slyngel (Talk | contribs) . . (- . . (Last undo for me this time, but you are plainly and simply wrong.) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 01:00, 5 March 2016 Weaseloid (Talk | contribs) m . . (+ . . (Reverted edits by Sorte Slyngel (talk) to last revision by Weaseloid) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 00:55, 5 March 2016 Sorte Slyngel (Talk | contribs) . . (- . . (Take the time to explain before you undo. I'll undo for now, but of course I'm going to lose a war of attrition. But in matters of personal preferences, you are just another RW-User. So, again, explain the law before undoing.) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 00:51, 5 March 2016 Weaseloid (Talk | contribs) m . . (+ . . (Reverted edits by Sorte Slyngel (talk) to last revision by Weaseloid) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 00:47, 5 March 2016 Sorte Slyngel (Talk | contribs) . . (- . . (Undo revision 1636034 by Weaseloid (talk) Unjustified undo) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 00:28, 5 March 2016 Weaseloid (Talk | contribs) m . . (+ . . (Reverted edits by Sorte Slyngel (talk) to last revision by The Fuzz) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 21:01, 4 March 2016 Sorte Slyngel (Talk | contribs) . . (- . . (Removed "illegal" from Sea Shepherd's anti-whaling and anti-sealhunting activities. Legality has nothing to do with the case.) (undo)
OK, I would want you to explain your side of the Sea Shepherd issue
Before you revert or undo take the time to think about what illegal means. Sea Shepherd doesn't make any distinction based on legality. You should ponder before you undo again. Of course I'll lose a protracted battle over this, but I would like to see your point of view. What's legal in this case? A lot is legal. Sea Shepherd is against all of it, legal or not. Don't let your personal tendencies spill over. My edit stands for itself, although I will probably in the minority of just a few. No matter, I'm used to that. But what is your conclusion having brushed up on the law? Cheers Sorte Slyngel (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
I've responded on the talk page where it's appropriate. Thanks for the patronising lecture though. ЩєазєюіδMethinks it is a Weasel 01:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hard_green&diff=prev&oldid=1636048
To Weaseloid
Why did you revert? „Captain“ Watson defines the law according to his own understanding of legality, which is that he's right, no matter what. I'll revert your reversion for now. I don't want to get involved in an edit war, but moderator or not, please state your reasons. Antipathy or sympathy aside, every case should be judged by it's own merits. Cheers Sorte Slyngel (talk) 00:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
OK, undone as promised. Could you explain how Sea Shepherd's understanding of the law makes things legal. There is, for instance not a total ban on whaling, and Sea Shepherders themselves are on record for saying precisely that their „understanding“ trumps everything. Keep this in mind, please, before you undo me blindly. Cheers Sorte Slyngel (talk) 00:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
The article text in that paragraph states "Sea Shepherd claims they are acting under the color of international law". Sea Shepherd's website states "Sea Shepherd uses innovative direct-action tactics to investigate, document, and take action when necessary to expose and confront illegal activities on the high seas". Your assertion that "Legality has nothing to do with the case" is untenable. Wēāŝēīōīď
Please remember that you have been told not to edit war & that you should seek consensus on the talk page in cases where you are reverted. This is the last warning you will receive from me about this. Wėąṣėḷőįď
Moexlibu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2016
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016