War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Ultra masculinity is an almost clichèd gay subculture.
True. It's usually the people who obsess over being masculine that sound really, really gay. As if men fawning over other men's muscles and biceps is something straight men do.

Daily Mail has a decent summary of pedo Putin's revenge strikes:


Acts like that guarantee that all but moral and social deviants (on whom Russia sometimes holds kompromat) support Ukraine's fight against Asiatic barbarism. White people are murdered by literal Golden Horde Mongols and Moslems, yet they support the terrorist entity over a white country.
That's the biggest thing that's surprised me. People who usually bitch about defending the white race are cheering on a nation full of Central Asian migrants and Muslims as they destroy a white, Christian country. And now they think Russia is winning again just because some civilians died and some buildings got hit? Unless it actually hurts Ukraine's military, it's not going to do much.

Damn, I guess Belarus and Russia are gonna just beat the shit out of Ukraine as everyone lights their Brandenburg gates and Eiffel towers in blue and yellow.
Beat the shit out of Ukraine? At most they just killed a few civilians and blew up some places, but it didn't hurt Ukraine that much.

It's like pissing on a bear and expecting it to run away instead of ripping your dick off.
 
Eagerness with which Russia conducted clearly asymmetrical response to the attack whose perpetrator wasn't even confirmed makes me think that Crimea bridge explosion was possibly Putin's gayop, wouldn't be the first time. "Ryazan sugar" comes to mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings

Russian government and their propaganda whores insist on calling Ukrainian regime a terrorist one, and this episode with the bridge being a terrorist attack (even though compared to everything Russia did to Ukraine it's a drop in the ocean). It's all for a reason.
Quite fucking rich, coming from the country that terrorized their neighbor all this time.
Like Serbs and Croats 30 years ago? Or the Russians in Holodomor? Or Ukrainians and Poles in the years 1943-1947?

Get real. Slavs kill each other just like wolves from different packs kill each other. There is no such thing as slavic unity (neither germanic unity, nor scandinavian unity, nor any of this nonsense at all).

Panslavism and other blahblah like it is a pure stupidy produced by russians.
Funny how European countries that warred with each other for literal ages managed to somehow settle down and coexist peacefully, enjoying mutual prosperity. Not without their problems, but the notion of redrawing borders was left behind in the century past. It never leads to anything good.
 
Last edited:
Like Serbs and Croats 30 years ago? Or the Russians in Holodomor? Or Ukrainians and Poles in the years 1943-1947?

Get real. Slavs kill each other just like wolves from different packs kill each other. There is no such thing as slavic unity (neither germanic unity, nor scandinavian unity, nor any of this nonsense at all).

Panslavism and other blahblah like it is a pure stupidy produced by russians.
No biggie.
We just need some neo-Ottoman invasion and we'll get over petty squabbles.
 
Damn, I guess Belarus and Russia are gonna just beat the shit out of Ukraine as everyone lights their Brandenburg gates and Eiffel towers in blue and yellow.


The sanctions will work THIS time, bros.
OHHH I'M A FIXIN' TO CONDEMN.

View attachment 3728083
Imagine getting your shit kicked in a war you started and had every consneedable advantage in so bad that your last hope of victory is fuckin belarus riding to your rescue

Thats a situation that would embarrass fucking san marino, let alone the literal superpower 2020 and almighty military juggernaut that is russia
 
Imagine getting your shit kicked in a war you started and had every consneedable advantage in so bad that your last hope of victory is fuckin belarus riding to your rescue

Thats a situation that would embarrass fucking san marino, let alone the literal superpower 2020 and almighty military juggernaut that is russia
Which makes me think that there's not a single Russian general with balls, because someone like that would become sick of being subjected to such humiliation by now, and the source of it all is none other than their own leader.
I guess it's true what someone earlier said. Competent military would be a threat to someone like Putin, so its command is based on loyalty instead of competence.
I don't see how one could win with the army that doesn't know how to think against the one that does.
 
As if the US or any in it can ridicule civilian casualties during war after fire bombing wooden cities and two nuclear detonations in civilian population centres.
Yeah the Russians, British, Germans, Japanese, Italians, and Chinese were really known for their restraint and avoidance of smashing civilians in WW2

They call it total war for a reason, vatnigger
 
Imagine getting your shit kicked in a war you started and had every consneedable advantage in so bad that your last hope of victory is fuckin belarus riding to your rescue

Thats a situation that would embarrass fucking san marino, let alone the literal superpower 2020 and almighty military juggernaut that is russia
The funniest part so far was even Iran saying this war is a bad idea. When you lose Iran..
 
We just need some neo-Ottoman invasion and we'll get over petty squabbles.
In last one Slavs was so divided, that some of them was fighting under the Ottoman command. And their was one of the best soldiers of Sublime Porta.

"Slav unity" is just on the same level of delusion than "unity of black people". Between a Kru and a Damara is equal number of differences than between russians and Slovenes.
 
In last one Slavs was so divided, that some of them was fighting under the Ottoman command. And their was one of the best soldiers of Sublime Porta.

"Slav unity" is just on the same level of delusion than "unity of black people". Between a Kru and a Damara is equal number of differences than between russians and Slovenes.
It's called an ideal, and you're supposed to work towards it.
We're not on twitter where hordes of leftoids deconstruct anything that contradicts their hedonistic, nihilistic vision of humanity.
Imperfections does not render an ideal invalid.
Also Turks bribed them with special status if they converted or were mercenaries, so the dumber, lower IQ gave in, instead of coalescing around the tribe and its interests. Money corrupts. Empires have lots of money. Just one in many reasons why they must be crushed. The true resilience was shown by those that kept identity, tribe and religion in face of occupation and its horrible consequences.
Cheers.
 
Imperfections does not render an ideal invalid.
The idea of Slavic unity is just a silly thing like utopian socialism, anarchism or some other blahblah about making everyone nice and rich. You are just in a delusion.

The funniest part so far was even Iran saying this war is a bad idea. When you lose Iran..
Iran is affraid about russian collapse due to their isolation. If Teheran will not be backed by moscow it will fall soon after moscow.
 
The idea of Slavic unity is just a silly thing like utopian socialism, anarchism or some other blahblah about making everyone nice and rich. You are just in a delusion.


Iran is affraid about russian collapse due to their isolation. If Teheran will not be backed by moscow it will fall soon after moscow.
Ok, mr. aYN rAND epitome of superhuman capitalist struggle
 
Judging by reports and footage it seems to be a slaughterhouse in the Bakhmut direction, the Russians have been throwing themselves at the Ukrainian defenses for three months now, apparently leaving the fields in the area covered in corpses. I don't really get it to be honest, since the liberation of Izium and Lyman there's no longer any strategic value to be gained from taking the city.
 

Attachments

  • 0PRpBvKLrgLSSj3Z.mp4
    1,023.8 KB
  • 1665426056799.png
    1665426056799.png
    817.9 KB · Views: 29
  • 1665426093596.png
    1665426093596.png
    771.9 KB · Views: 29
Judging by reports and footage it seems to be a slaughterhouse in the Bakhmut direction, the Russians have been throwing themselves at the Ukrainian defenses for three months now, apparently leaving the fields in the area covered in corpses. I don't really get it to be honest, since the liberation of Izium and Lyman there's no longer any strategic value to be gained from taking the city.
Must be surreal. Being a Russian conscript charging over a battlefield littered with your own dead in various stages of decomp
 
the only commander during the August Coup of the Soviet Union that shot and killed protesters.
Pretty amazing, really. This man tried to singlehandedly save the USSR. Now, he's being given a free hand to stop a later wave of jewish terror attacks against his people.
 
Must be surreal. Being a Russian conscript charging over a battlefield littered with your own dead in various stages of decomp
It's also pretty surreal watching Russian conscripts charging over a battlefield littered with their own dead online to be honest; the amount of footage this war has generated is insane, the proliferation of drone and smart phone footage has allowed for an unprecedented amount of coverage. Imagine if in the 1940's people had been able to follow the social media account of some american soldier assaulting Omaha beach, or German drone footage sweeping over the whole Normandy front.
 
Judging by reports and footage it seems to be a slaughterhouse in the Bakhmut direction, the Russians have been throwing themselves at the Ukrainian defenses for three months now, apparently leaving the fields in the area covered in corpses. I don't really get it to be honest, since the liberation of Izium and Lyman there's no longer any strategic value to be gained from taking the city.
A lot of Russians live in the parallel reality where it's still 1945, and zerg rush is both viable and affordable tactic. Their command is patently incompetent, and initiative on the ground level is non-existent, because that's not how Russian army is designed. We've seen this pattern of repeating the same thing all over again in vain many times from them already.
They put a lot of emphasis on symbolism, and something like Bakhmut could just be a matter of pride.
 
A lot of Russians live in the parallel reality where it's still 1945, and zerg rush is both viable and affordable tactic. Their command is patently incompetent, and initiative on the ground level is non-existent, because that's not how Russian army is designed. We've seen this pattern of repeating the same thing all over again in vain many times from them already.
They put a lot of emphasis on symbolism, and something like Bakhmut could just be a matter of pride.
Most likely, it's also useful to remember that this part of the front is comprised of mostly Wagner paramilitary, whose command are apparently entirely separate from the conventional Russian HQ apparatus, leading to strategic objectives that are wholly divergent from one another. Honestly its probably best to see the Russian Ground Forces involved in the war as separate and independent armies, compromising regular forces, Rosgvardiya and PMCs such as Wagner.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back