Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[repentance]

edit: archive.md is messed up and i have been at #1 in the queue for 2 hours now. Will try again later if i remember.

the archive.x sites have been doing that a lot lately

Richard Hoeg on Twitter: "Okay folks, so I've been giving this a lot of thought (you should see my comments!), but unfortunately, I've been forced to come to the conclusion that many of you have been misinformed by folks out to find some "enemies" to

ghostarchive.org

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

Mr Peacock is so far the only lawyer that exceeds Nick in general degeneracy. Guy was always a treat to have on.

Some of the favorite moments from any livestream on any platform is listening to Nick, Drexel, and Peacock just tell insane stories. Man Peacock was hilarious.

 

[TheClappening]

Some of the favorite moments from any livestream on any platform is listening to Nick, Drexel, and Peacock just tell insane stories. Man Peacock was hilarious.

Kian had just as many degenerate stories as Drexel, but without the annoying MGTOW.

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

At this point I assume TUG is just first class trolling. The answers these bitches spout out are only harming and exposing them more.

Does TUG have his own thread yet?

Anyways, nice to see that Bytes is digging that hole deeper. No need to go and force her at gunpoint when it's voluntary!

 

[TheClappening]

Does TUG have his own thread yet?

Anyways, nice to see that Bytes is digging that hole deeper. No need to go and force her at gunpoint when it's voluntary!

He has a thread over in the Weeb Wars section

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/that-umbrella-guy-tug-matthew-lewis.59081/

 

[frenchmortar]

Hoag said that Nick called him "30-50 names that [he] heard of"

What the fuck is he talking about? What name calling is he referring to, and when did Nick call him them? What did he intend when he mentioned it apropos of nothing? Is he trying to imply that joking amongst friends is actually serious business? Does he mean that Nick read mean superchats about him and he's transplanting the blame onto Nick? Or is he trying to imply that, behind the scenes, Nick is just badmouthing him to his face? I don't even believe that it ever happened, but he said it as though it informed his understanding of the banning.
And why do either of them still have nothing at all to say about the mass-flagging and the frivolous bar complaints? Why can't they just stop talking about it? Every new thing they say makes them look worse.

Not to mention how limp-dicked the "We should expect badwrong people to be removed. You're naive if this bothers you" position Hoag implied and others have posted here. Yes, the current situation we have means that mobs of faggots and global corporations can utterly annihilate your presence on all mainstream outlets in an attempt to disallow your participation in society at large, but that doesn't mean the answer is to stay compliant with their bullshit and wag your finger at those that get removed for "not following the rules". How is that position useful to anyone at all but the people doing the removal? Demonstrating your previous knowledge of the gay rules they want you to follow and that you know their actual intended use is just to fuck you whenever you step out of line while simultaneously tut-tutting those that get incensed upon first learning about them doesn't make you sound clever or wise, it just makes you look like a jaded loser who refuses to stand for anything.

 

[mindlessobserver]

"Kiwi Farms has been dropped from the internet forever! Let's gloat about it!" ... ... ... 'Uh..."

"Rekieta's had his Youtube channel banned forever! Let's gloat about it!" ... ... ... "Uh..."

It's brilliant - these people start acting smug just in time to find out their efforts have been wasted. and end up looking stupid instead

If they could get their feet any further down their throats, they'll be able to use themselves as pogo sticks.

People who stand for nothing, amount to nothing.

 

[Sitaw]

Hoag said that Nick called him "30-50 names that [he] heard of"

What the fuck is he talking about? What name calling is he referring to, and when did Nick call him them? What did he intend when he mentioned it apropos of nothing?

Probably thinks every fat shaming superchats are directed to him.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Probably thinks every fat shaming superchats are directed to him.

Or he's just making it up to justify his hurt feelings over the success of someone he doesn't like. Also has this egg shaped allegedly male figure ever had male friends? The banter is part of the friendship, faggot...

 

[DragoonSierra]

He's the retard who founded Bot Sentinel, a company that supposedly tells people whether a twitter account is a bot and/or violating twitter's TOS. He was paid by Megan Markle and Amber Heard to help explain away why everyone thought they were massive cunts during their respective PR nightmares, labeling everyone who didn't like those figures as bots, racist, sexist, etc. He's been used in Rolling Stone and NYT articles as an expert on disinformation.

Bouzy started catching heat from Rackets and others because of consistent lies when reporting on the Heard shit and it's came out that not only is his Bot Sentinel company hot garbage (who could've guessed), but he may have also been involved in a ton of scams and possibly stole the Bot Sentinel code from someone else and is passing it off on his own.

Oh he's also being sued by Nate the Lawyer (with Ron Coleman as Nate's attorney) for defamation because the retard can't help but lie for a living

What damage did Bouzy cause to Nate?

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

What damage did Bouzy cause to Nate?

Probably none. I think Nate is going for defamation per se.

 

[DragoonSierra]

These imbeciles absolutely never learn a god damned thing from history and -- as the colloquialism goes -- have doomed themselves to repeat it. They really don't want to drive this issue into the hands of the SCOTUS because not only is it unlikely to go the way they arrogantly expect it to, there's already long-standing precedent that would really make things worse for big tech.

The case I'm about to cite is obviously not a direct allegory (since the opinion was published in 1946) but it still handily covers this situation and would undoubtedly be cited by whatever party ultimately winds up spanking these power-hungry cunts in the Big Court.

In Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), the Supreme Court said:


In short, I can kick anybody out of my house that I want to, even if I've previously invited them personally, because it's a private residence and I don't let just anybody in. They don't have any kind of constitutionality claim against me. But if I buy a skate park, actively maintain it, open it to the general public and say "hey, come skate here, it's safe, clean and free!" I can't just start chasing off anybody who I overhear talking about cauliflower. I'd already be on the losing side if I did that anyway, but it'd be even worse if mine was the only skate park in town, or at least the only one anybody actually wants to use.

These absolutely dumb shits have weaseled and brute-forced their way into being the most popular comms platforms on earth, not just (supposedly) opening the doors to everyone who can reach them but proudly boasting about how big their userbase is and how popular they are. Yet they still expect to be able to quietly put their hand up to stop a handful of "undesirables" as they encounter them.

Having absolutely crushed all viable competition, these platforms have become the de facto "only game in town," which comes with some inconvenient legal obligations that wouldn't eventually get shoved up their asses if they'd either just let some competition grow (lol) or quit being totalitarian cunts.

But we all know they're going to stay the course and fight to the bitter end for their imagined right to corner the market on conversation then selectively ban everyone who says there are two sexes.

Is that the Jehovahs witness private property case? Mall of America case obiliterated that decision from orbit.

 

[2lolis1cup]

Does he mean that Nick read mean superchats about him and he's transplanting the blame onto Nick?

For 5 dollars from Hoag sucks dick, "Hoag simps so hard for legal karen that he named his dildo a bigger byte"

 

[Zombie Dealership]

Probably thinks every fat shaming superchats are directed to him.

They should be. A cocksucker like him shouldn't be that bloated unless the sailors have just come home. He really should take up getting fat-shamed publicly like Farran did. It worked for her.

 

[TJBirish]

I watched Legal Mindset's stream last nite and he mentioned a few things about Hoeg. One is that he was on stream laughing about Nick getting banned and the other is that he supported the banning, I guess on a Twitter thread.

Anybody have any idea what he's talking about?

 

[biteXsized]

I watched Legal Mindset's stream last nite and he mentioned a few things about Hoeg. One is that he was on stream laughing about Nick getting banned and the other is that he supported the banning, I guess on a Twitter thread.

Anybody have any idea what he's talking about?

He referrs to the clip in the video posted here:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-13016867

 

[Trianon]

It's that + apparently them blaming Nick for their numbers plateauing and then falling after Depp ended. They thought they had broken through some mythical ceiling and it was nothing but upward trends from here on out... Until Nick stole their viewers from them.

Boy, they are stupid. Some of them like Runkle said repeatedly they were grateful for the sudden interest but knew that Depp v. Heard was a rare thing and that they'd be fortunate if a few people stuck around afterward. It would be dumb to not anticipate that maybe once the Trial of the Century was over, there'd at least be a lag before the next big thing happened.

Nick and Emily both do the best because they have specific brands, like libertarian commentary or a focus on Hollywood/celeb drama, that are sustainable without following trials.

It does make me happy to see Kurt stick up for Nick. I was surprised when the whole Lawtube community got formed how people were willing to allow each other to be liberal or conservative without trying to cancel each other, so what animosity there is has to go to lower stakes stuff like court etiquette or hemming and hawing over hypotheticals. I think that's genuinely a good thing, and having cross-political or cross-religious or whatever friendships like that warms my heart a bit. Just a bit. People like Bytes and Hoag are rewarded for being spineless everywhere else in our culture, but here, honesty and loyalty are valued. It's good to see people just sticking up for each other as people and fecklessness being frowned upon.

I don't even think there should be an expectation that everyone on Lawtube be friends, but just be real about it. And recognize that YouTube kicking anyone off affects all of you, regardless of how you feel about Nick.

 

[Iron Hamster]

It's an unbelievably bad statement.

He keeps saying "I didn't know the facts so how could I have said anything?"

Every tweet makes him look more and more like the cowardly whiny bitch that he really is.

He had no issue saying something when Nick got his second strike and it was quite smug. I'm trying to find the video he said it in. Meanwhile, I found he covered the Cloudlare saga. Farms bashing starts at 5:14

Of course the lithuanian snake piggy backs off of Hoeg's whining:

Legal Bytes 🍽💙🍁🍂 on Twitter

“Same same. ⬇️ Couldn’t have said it better myself! But I’ll add one more thing for my part: (1/7)”

web.archive.org

This part pisses me the most off:
View attachment 3728192


Now she implies Nick is fomenting cyber-bullying and advocates for doxing, or how else should I read this tweet? She really is a backstabbing bitch.

Her, Hoag, And L&L were never a fit with Nick. It was easy to see. Even Emily isn't a fit really. They are too straight-laced. L&L trying to appear the 'rebel' was cringe.

At this point I assume TUG is just first class trolling. The answers these bitches spout out are only harming and exposing them more.

ThatMailboxGuy has been looking for his golden ticket for awhile. He's an idiot.

 

[TexOffender]

 

[Abbadon's Gate]

ThatMailboxGuy has been looking for his golden ticket for awhile. He's an idiot.

Made the mistake of subbing to TUG during the Depp trial, and unsubbed like 48 hours later. Nigger did nothing but post 57 videos about Amber Heard daily.

Dude came across as mentally ill with how much obsessive coverage he did. Honestly, I get wanting to stand up for someone whose been wronged, but the sheer amount of stuff TUG would make videos about came across as super cringe and probably validated a lot of arguments about online stalkers having it out for Heard.