Susie Green & Mermaids UK - "Trans Kid Support Charity", Susie had her underage kid get GRS

[nym]

What I really, really want to know is who these two secret redacted trustees are/were.

Mermaids

Mermaids envisions a world where transgender, non-binary and gender diverse children can be themselves and thrive, free of discrimination and prejudice. Transgender, nonbinary and gender-diverse children and teens need support and understanding, as well as the freedom to explore their gender...

app.whatimpact.com

might be some of the other names that are on this page, maybe not, but they give a lot more for the Board of Trustees

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

If a child can look up a picture of your dick or your axe wound or your actual bobs and vagene on the internet with a few keystrokes, you should indeed be barred from ever being in a position where you can influence that child's development more than your exhibitionism already has.

But these disgusting creatures want children to see them doing perverted shit. It's a feature, not a bug.

 

[Geranium]

I can access it with a VPN but it runs a bot check.

A check provided by (surprise!) Cloudflare.

Just so we're clear, according to Cloudflare:
Exposing pedophiles
Being pedophiles

I would say Emma Watson is likely. She would do anything for woke cred.

Well yes, so if she was a trustee I would have thought she would be bragging about it in public, not hiding her name as a trustee.

 

[Super Dilator Duel 3D]

MrCrystalMighty decrying the consequences of being "publicly sexual": (twitter.com, archive.ph)
View attachment 3730308

If you knew what appropriate boundaries were you wouldn't be "publicly sexual" you retarded fucking weirdo.

@Geranium, I'll be sending you an invoice for the brain cells you owe me after reading this tweet.

 

[repentance]

Well yes, so if she was a trustee I would have thought she would be bragging about it in public, not hiding her name as a trustee.

It would be unusual for a famous person to hide that. Part of the point in having a big name in that kind of role is to add credibility and status to an organisation.

 

[Doji]

If any anti pedo law enforcement wanted to catch a few, all they have to do is a shakedown on the whole mermaid shit.

 

[MadDisaster]

Yeah, I'm gonna go out on a limb here (not really) by stating the obvious: if you are publicly sexual, you have no business coaching, teaching, supervising or otherwise working with children. This is a consequence you must accept in exchange for having the freedom to flop your dong around in public without being arrested. Certain actions close certain doors in life even if they open others. A teacher who decides to "moonlight" as a prostitute is making an active, conscious choice to forfeit her teaching career at a moment of someone else's choosing.

If a child can look up a picture of your dick or your axe wound or your actual bobs and vagene on the internet with a few keystrokes, you should indeed be barred from ever being in a position where you can influence that child's development more than your exhibitionism already has.

I never used to have issues with people who had been in porn becoming teachers, or working with kids, but that was when it was usually some old video done under a fake name that was unlikely to actually be seen by any kids. It's significantly different to have people working with children who are actively doing "sex work", or posting pornographic and/or fetish content and sharing it on their public social media. One is a part of someone's life that they've tried to move on from; the other is a continuing, active choice.

The entire trans movement seems to have a real problem with the idea that you can do what you like with your life, but those choices will affect your life going forward. Want to transition? Okay, but the tradeoff is that you can't participate in competitive sports. Want to post your sexuality on social media? Fine, but you won't be appropriate to work with children. You can't always have everything you want. Most adults understand this, and prioritize what's most important to them.

 

[repentance]

If any anti pedo law enforcement wanted to catch a few, all they have to do is a shakedown on the whole mermaid shit.

It's usually not that simple. Pedos are often very well protected by the Establishment.

 

[Thumb Butler]

A check provided by (surprise!) Cloudflare.

Just so we're clear, according to Cloudflare:
Exposing pedophiles
Being pedophiles


Well yes, so if she was a trustee I would have thought she would be bragging about it in public, not hiding her name as a trustee.

You have a point. It's probably a high profile politician or one of the inbred royals.

 

[nym]

I never used to have issues with people who had been in porn becoming teachers, or working with kids, but that was when it was usually some old video done under a fake name that was unlikely to actually be seen by any kids.

This makes me think of all those stories: "Years ago I did porn and now I'm a schoolteacher/nurse. Some student / coworker recognized me, told everyone I did porn, I got harassed and then *I* got fired for it."

Like it always stumps me: you were using a fake name 5 years ago, today you look so similarly at work to how you looked while you were getting fucked on video that people recognize you and are certain it was you?!
(because the easy answer is: "no, that's not me, and if you keep talking about this, that's sexual harassment" -- but that never occurs)
I guess some tattoos or something might confirm a suspicion some porn addict might have gotten, but that would only explain like 5% of those stories. All those cases strike me as someone who started talking to coworkers about how they once did porn...
... a little too "open", one may say.

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

Pretty sure I've seen Anna and Genevieve reference KF before, can't remember exactly but I think it might have been one of their articles that finally convinced me to sign up here earlier this year.

Thought I'd round up some examples of the Woke Brigade defending the kaleidoscrote. Archive is being slow for me at the moment, so I've just done Colin's tweet because he's infamous, and then one other because it was a scorching hot take.

Colin / Katy Montgomerie crying about reposting a public image being "revenge porn": (twitter.com, archive.ph)
View attachment 3730301

MrCrystalMighty decrying the consequences of being "publicly sexual": (twitter.com, archive.ph)
View attachment 3730308

Darren's dick pic smorgasbord was "erotic art":
View attachment 3730306

Really it's the TERFs' fault because the image was only meant to be in an online porn magazine:
View attachment 3730307

View attachment 3730305
"Where do babies come from mummy?"
"Well, my love, when a woman and a man love each other very much, they ask a young man who works with vulnerable children to take pictures of his hard willy and bum hole and then he sends them to a dirty magazine so they can be shown on the internet."

View attachment 3730298
"Adam X" is an FTM but perhaps her clients' parents should know about the porn she posts on her public Twitter feed?

Sharing a publicly available image is terrorism! The UK's National Crime Agency must act now!
View attachment 3730304
View attachment 3730303


View attachment 3730309
View attachment 3730310
View attachment 3730300
View attachment 3730302
View attachment 3730314

"DRAWING ATTENTION TO THIS PICTURE SHOULD BE A CRIME. MAYBE IT IS ALREADY A CRIME."
View attachment 3730313
View attachment 3730312
View attachment 3730311

I think this one might be satire based on the poster's bio (he's a gay man who opposes being lumped in with the queers).
View attachment 3730299

Yikes lol...

"OMG You can't expose the things we do, say and support!! NOT FAIR! REEEEEEEEEE"

My word are these freakouts fun to watch.

 

[Burd Turglar]

I've only been tangentially watching the shit that get's front page when it comes to this org because I don't care about England outside of easy jokes but this is really becoming a hilarious roller coaster of L's for degenerate fucks.

>I work for a government sponsored program involving children, I should post my dick and asshole all over the internet
>Wait bruv, why's your biscuits n gravy on the open internet?
>BIGGGGGGGGOTTTTT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE TERRORISMMMM REEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

The absolute state of the world these days

 

[Sexual Chocolate]

This makes me think of all those stories: "Years ago I did porn and now I'm a schoolteacher/nurse. Some student / coworker recognized me, told everyone I did porn, I got harassed and then *I* got fired for it."

Like it always stumps me: you were using a fake name 5 years ago, today you look so similarly at work to how you looked while you did porn that people recognize you?!
I guess some tattoos or something might confirm a suspicion some porn addict might have gotten, but that would only explain like 5% of those stories. All those cases strike me as someone who started talking to coworkers about how they once did porn...

It's almost like... hos are liars.

The entire trans movement seems to have a real problem with the idea that you can do what you like with your life

Which is a shame, they were doing so well with that "I'm a 44 year old man with three kids and a beer belly but now I'm a lady " thing.

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

I never used to have issues with people who had been in porn becoming teachers, or working with kids, but that was when it was usually some old video done under a fake name that was unlikely to actually be seen by any kids. It's significantly different to have people working with children who are actively doing "sex work", or posting pornographic and/or fetish content and sharing it on their public social media. One is a part of someone's life that they've tried to move on from; the other is a continuing, active choice.

The entire trans movement seems to have a real problem with the idea that you can do what you like with your life, but those choices will affect your life going forward. Want to transition? Okay, but the tradeoff is that you can't participate in competitive sports. Want to post your sexuality on social media? Fine, but you won't be appropriate to work with children. You can't always have everything you want. Most adults understand this, and prioritize what's most important to them.

This makes me think of all those stories: "Years ago I did porn and now I'm a schoolteacher/nurse. Some student / coworker recognized me, told everyone I did porn, I got harassed and then *I* got fired for it."

Like it always stumps me: you were using a fake name 5 years ago, today you look so similarly at work to how you looked while you did porn that people recognize you?!
I guess some tattoos or something might confirm a suspicion some porn addict might have gotten, but that would only explain like 5% of those stories. All those cases strike me as someone who started talking to coworkers about how they once did porn...

Yeah, these types of examples are a totally different beast. And not only because letters and letter allies are beginning to openly suggest, defend and even encourage letter porn and even "shows" as a means of helping letter youth learn to "accept" and become "comfortable" with themselves. Just look at the new movie 'bros' which has a scene defending exposing a minor (<14 in fact) to a gay sex show in order to help him come to terms with and get more comfortable with his sexuality. Used as an excuse in an in-story debate about whether (why) it's OK to talk about letter people crap and overt sexuality to school children! There is NOTHING anyone can say that will make me look at the involvement of these types of people with both porn and children, as being harmlessly incidental.. Sorry, that ship has sailed by LONG ago!

 

[nym]

'bros' which has a scene defending exposing a minor (<14 in fact) to a gay sex show in order to help

Yeah.
You can easily sell me on "13 year olds are gonna see porn in today's society, it's inevitable". Alright.
The thing is, I can't trust "you" [school, stranger, whatever adult... or today's progressive parent] to determine what's in the child's best interest, if you ever think that you showing them porn is what's in their best interest. No.

I don't know how you can properly parent today while sending a child to a public school. It really seems impossible, when really...
It should be so simple. At some point they're approaching puberty, you're not only gonna have to sit the kid down and have that "birds & bees" discussion but at some point not long after "you're gonna see this porn stuff, you really shouldn't go looking for it, but what you gotta know, is real sex with someone you love is nothing like that" or w/e. "If you ever have any questions or problems you can always come talk to me about it" [of course they won't but c'est la vie].
I dunno, not a parent, but in my mind it should be as simple as that.

Unfortunately, you then let your kid go to school, and you have to almost EXPECT there will be adults in authority positions there actively trying to pervert your child.
Seems like homeschooling is the only option for anyone anymore.

Just seems impossible. I cannot imagine what the world will look like 50 years from now.
You 3% of young KiwiFarmers who are sane and well-adjusted and not totally retarded deformed freaks need to go out ASAP and marry & make some kids and raise them good ffs, because otherwise... whew...
["3%" -- yeah that's gonna get some "Optimistic" stickers eh]

 

[AnOminous]

mf looks like a Guess Who character

He looks like the guy from Boys Beware.

 

[The Magnificence]

View attachment 3730493

DfE removes trans charity Mermaids from wellbeing resources

The Department for Education has removed trans rights charity Mermaids from school mental health resources, amid an investigation over safeguarding concerns

schoolsweek.co.uk

DfE removes trans charity Mermaids from wellbeing resources

archived 11 Oct 2022 17:08:29 UTC

archive.ph

FUCK YEAH! Department of Education found their delete button

Too bad it took identifying a literal pedophile on their board to get to this point.

 

[Beautiful Border]

He looks like the guy from Boys Beware.
View attachment 3731344

It's almost as if people in the 50s knew what was up all along.
"People in the olden days thought it was good to be suspicious of weird people who want access to children? Man, what a bunch of bigots they were!"

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

Yeah.
You can easily sell me on "13 year olds are gonna see porn in today's society, it's inevitable". Alright.
The thing is, I can't trust "you" [school, stranger, whatever adult... or today's progressive parent] to determine what's in the child's best interest, if you ever think that you showing them porn is what's in their best interest. No.

I don't know how you can properly parent today while sending a child to a public school. It really seems impossible, when really...
It should be so simple. At some point they're approaching puberty, you're not only gonna have to sit the kid down and have that "birds & bees" discussion but at some point not long after "you're gonna see this porn stuff, you really shouldn't go looking for it, but what you gotta know, is real sex with someone you love is nothing like that" or w/e. "If you ever have any questions or problems you can always come talk to me about it" [of course they won't but c'est la vie].
I dunno, not a parent, but in my mind it should be as simple as that.

Unfortunately, you then let your kid go to school, and you have to almost EXPECT there will be adults in authority positions there actively trying to pervert your child.
Seems like homeschooling is the only option for anyone anymore.

Just seems impossible. I cannot imagine what the world will look like 50 years from now.
You 3% of young KiwiFarmers who are sane and well-adjusted and not totally deformed freaks need to go out ASAP and marry & make some kids and raise them good ffs, because otherwise... whew...
["3%" -- yeah that's gonna get some "Optimistic" stickers eh]

Indeed.. And really, i'd put minors finding/looking at porn on a whole different level from adults intentionally exposing them to overt pornographic content.. Hell, even just allowing them to is on a different level morally and ethically speaking! But the idea that non-family adults are going to do it as part of some form of mandate... FUCK NO! Especially when one considers that there is no higher logic or purpose to all this, that it is all solely about attempts at subverting cultural norms to begin with.

 

[Fields Of Rye]

I never used to have issues with people who had been in porn becoming teachers, or working with kids, but that was when it was usually some old video done under a fake name that was unlikely to actually be seen by any kids. It's significantly different to have people working with children who are actively doing "sex work", or posting pornographic and/or fetish content and sharing it on their public social media. One is a part of someone's life that they've tried to move on from; the other is a continuing, active choice.

The entire trans movement seems to have a real problem with the idea that you can do what you like with your life, but those choices will affect your life going forward. Want to transition? Okay, but the tradeoff is that you can't participate in competitive sports. Want to post your sexuality on social media? Fine, but you won't be appropriate to work with children. You can't always have everything you want. Most adults understand this, and prioritize what's most important to them.

Its not just about of the kids see it. It’s the parents being comfortable. Anyone whose worked at a summer camp knows how squeaky clean some shit has to be. If your presence makes the average person uncomfortable you gotta go, and the fact someone would ever claim “lol who cares” means they aren’t doing it for the kids or parents.