Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%

  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%

  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%

  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%

  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%

  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%

  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%

  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%
  • Total voters
    2,085
LargeChoonger said:
Does he not know the difference between civil and criminal court?
Click to expand...
No, he doesn't. He doesn't know what he's saying most of the time and is just grasping at straws. I'm pretty sure half of the stuff he read during his 50 minute rant was pulled directly from some black power sovereign citizen website
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snack Cracker, StevieLasVegas, FamicomGorby and 3 others
Noble Redditor said:
No, he doesn't. He doesn't know what he's saying most of the time and is just grasping at straws. I'm pretty sure half of the stuff he read during his 50 minute rant was pulled directly from some black power sovereign citizen website
Click to expand...
He's asked the same question a dozen times now, even after receiving a direct answer each time. He's still asking it
 
He asked for an explanation of Newton's laws of motion. If he was really on top of things, he'd ask if Newton's laws are true in a relativistic domain, and if the trooper took special and general relativity into account in his reconstruction. He could get every case that relied on this software thrown out.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flaming Insignias and FamicomGorby
Rofuyo said:
>Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Brooks asked for his case to be dismissed since the victims aren't present in court.
View attachment 3735888
Click to expand...
Is it just me, or are the media fucks slowly turning down the crackerfication filter they've been using on this guy? He seems a shade darker every couple days. Day 1, they were filtering him so hard that he looked like Aunt Polly's freshly whitewashed picket fence. Now he at least looks like an oreo.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Rome's rightful successor, pingas, Super-Chevy454 and 3 others
"I do not identify as an impostor, I do not consent to being called an impostor, I do not know anyone that sus"
Screenshot_20221014-130659.png
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Coal Burner Account, Ravana, Flaming Insignias and 1 other person
Cop that shot at Brooks was great on the stand. Kept talking to Brooks directly as they guy who was definitely in the SUV that he definitely wishes he hit, if only to save everyone the trouble of this trial.

Also from the rant yesterday the prosecutor pointed out that Brooks is using notes that were handed over to him by the defense attorneys he fired. If that's true that would explain why his defense is trying to go in two directions at once, cause he's basically trying to do two things simultaneously that contradict each other.

1. Say that it wasn't him in the SUV.

2. Provide alternate explanations for why the SUV plowed through a parade/downplay the damage it did. Usually for this he's been implying there could have been more people in the car, that the police barricades prevented the vehicle from exiting the parade route, that the vehicle was honking its horn to try and get people to move, and that the vehicle wasn't intentionally trying to hit anyone.

So obviously these two defenses contradict eachother, if Brooks claims to not be the person in the SUV that rammed through the parade, why would he focus so much on the actions of the vehicle in the parade?

Defense #2 is most likely what his defense attorneys were going to go for since they had originally wanted him to enter a not guilty by insanity plea. However Brooks apparently didn't get that and has decided to just deny everything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: murph, Markass the Worst, FatalTater and 3 others
FamicomGorby said:
Cop that shot at Brooks was great on the stand. Kept talking to Brooks directly as they guy who was definitely in the SUV that he definitely wishes he hit, if only to save everyone the trouble of this trial.

Also from the rant yesterday the prosecutor pointed out that Brooks is using notes that were handed over to him by the defense attorneys he fired. If that's true that would explain why his defense is trying to go in two directions at once, cause he's basically trying to do two things simultaneously that contradict each other.

1. Say that it wasn't him in the SUV.

2. Provide alternate explanations for why the SUV plowed through a parade/downplay the damage it did. Usually for this he's been implying there could have been more people in the car, that the police barricades prevented the vehicle from exiting the parade route, that the vehicle was honking its horn to try and get people to move, and that the vehicle wasn't intentionally trying to hit anyone.

So obviously these two defenses contradict eachother, if Brooks claims to not be the person in the SUV that rammed through the parade, why would he focus so much on the actions of the vehicle in the parade?

Defense #2 is most likely what his defense attorneys were going to go for since they had originally wanted him to enter a not guilty by insanity plea. However Brooks apparently didn't get that and has decided to just deny everything.
Click to expand...
I would've snapped by the second "here we go with the you again". Cop was amazing and the best witness so far
 
  • Like
Reactions: FamicomGorby
Pick off the list of any of the most radical, most revolutionary, most kill all wypipo 60s/70s black power figures and even that person would say dayum this nigger is retarded string him up by his balls already, he's setting our beautiful race of kangz and kweenz back more than fucking slavery did

An absolutely mythic level of niggerdry is afoot
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Markass the Worst, Gas Station Boner Pills, Vecr and 4 others
StevieLasVegas said:
Never have I ever wanted to curbstomp a mother fucker so much after watching this. Would he like the six tombstones to go to the stand so the plaintiff can ask each one a question to counter his retardation?
Click to expand...

He's the nigger version of OPL minus the incest.
 
Unexpected Genitals said:
There's a significant difference between a black man and a nigger.

But this is one of the niggest niggers to ever nig.
Click to expand...
ShoFuKan said:
You can go through the highlights for it but yes, for pimping of a 16yo in nevada, been in and out of prison almost 35 times since he was 17 and having an arrest record 50 pages long, just released on $1,000 bail for felony domestic dispute and skipping bail charges two days ago, wanna be gangster who worshiped Kemet and black nationalism. He is the very definition of a Nigger.
Click to expand...
Decent article here. The Milwaukee journal online is also doing daily trial coverage but most of the articles are behind a pay wall and won't archive.

@RandomInternetPerson
Got that for ya.


And the judge going off at Brooks.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Curious, Snack Cracker, TerrorCorpCEO and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back