- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
The private talk screams lies, but it wouldn't surprise me if Wu would think someone wouldn't record the convo just so she could twist it as wiretapping or sommat to sidestep is Not-a-lie is real or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This makes me worry he might have a stooge at the Guardian. Also not ruling out that some asskisser jumps to his defense and says he totally had that 3-way call and that Natalie is real. Whether that's a lie or not will matter little as John then uses that as "proof" that Natalie is a real person and says the subject is closed for debate.There is no good alternative here, and by implicating the Guardian as a party to this, it should be easy to verify if they know about this and know Natalie. Worse, the only way he can not look like a liar is get someone else to play along with this ruse.
Any other option makes him a charlatan.
The Guardian thing is so out of left-field because she just keeps saying that they approached her to do an interview with Natalie - that doesn't mean that they know anything about Natalie that we don't, just that they have also seen her claim that Natalie exists. It's pure desperation.
The fact that she specifically named the Guardian among the vague "hundreds" is all the confirmation I need to say she's got a connection there. Although her unwillingness to mention a specific person is odd. Maybe they aren't exactly comfortable potentially losing a job just to play along with an insane tranny?This makes me worry he might have a stooge at the Guardian. Also not ruling out that some asskisser jumps to his defense and says he totally had that 3-way call and that Natalie is real. Whether that's a lie or not will matter little as John then uses that as "proof" that Natalie is a real person and says the subject is closed for debate.
I mean that won't stop anyone from calling bullshit but it'll satisfy most people on the fence and most of the his toadies.
It would be funny if some cad were to create a fake 'Natalie' account and start answering questions. You can't get in trouble for impersonating somebody who doesn't exist, right?
The fact that she specifically named the Guardian among the vague "hundreds" is all the confirmation I need to say she's got a connection there. Although her unwillingness to mention a specific person is odd. Maybe they aren't exactly comfortable potentially losing a job just to play along with an insane tranny?
Creating a Natalie O'Brien Twitter account and listing the profession as "Harassment Manager" would be funny. Never mention Wu or GiantSpaceKat by name. Just make veiled comments about what her day to day job is like as a harassment manager along with re-tweeting Wu every once in awhile. It would drive Wu insane and as long as you don't mention any names it would not be taken down.
The fact that she specifically named the Guardian among the vague "hundreds" is all the confirmation I need to say she's got a connection there. Although her unwillingness to mention a specific person is odd. Maybe they aren't exactly comfortable potentially losing a job just to play along with an insane tranny?
There's the pissed off heart.Wu's response on Medium:
View attachment 77061
Anyone care to ask the Guardian about this?
Also, notice Wu wants to avoid anything involving photos or video, even in confidence?
I'm hoping that just maybe John's connection either doesn't have as much clout as Johnny hope for or that they're connected to some bullshit that John wants to avoid.The fact that she specifically named the Guardian among the vague "hundreds" is all the confirmation I need to say she's got a connection there. Although her unwillingness to mention a specific person is odd. Maybe they aren't exactly comfortable potentially losing a job just to play along with an insane tranny?
That's actually the kind of mistake I expected John to make early on when people started questioning him about Natalie. The fact that he didn't just resort to flashing a picture of some random woman he got off the net shows that there is some sort of "cunning" there. And it would not surprise me in the least if Frank was the one who acted as the voice of "reason". I know we all like to speculate the he's some hen-pecked little man (which he is) that only speaks when spoken to, but he's savvy enough to handle the taxes and keep things, more or less, above the level. This Natalie business was all John's idea and I'm betting that after he fucked things up with one lie after another Frank was and is the one who's trying to un-fuck things.The real problem for Flynt is that there is no one he can just trot and claim to be Natalie. Once the Internet has a picture, they'll trace it back to the real person.
This is why you don't give your head mates a real name and backstory.
"muh backchannel" – John "Brianna" WuHer "brilliant" strategy for this was just another one of her mysterious private talks?