It depends on what kind of minority it is and the external parties involved in it. There is a difference between several million African and Syrian migrants brought to the center of Europe within a couple of years and minorities who have lived in their territories for centuries.
I am a supporter of compromise, God knows national suprematism does not work in countries larger than a pea, as well as spreading the ass in front of minorities. Organize autonomies if there is an obvious conflict between the central and regional government.
I must say right away that I am not familiar with Hungarian-Romanian relations, and each ethnic-territorial issue should be dealt with individually. The conveyor belt approach used in Africa has shown its "effectiveness." Speaking specifically about Transylvania , as far as I understand, that Hungarians are about 20% of the population there, they can be ignored, but it would be stupid to pursue an open anti-Hungarian policy. It is possible to give greater autonomy to local authorities if locals are dissatisfied with the central government. And again, what is Hungary's position on this land and population? How stable is the Romanian government? Is a coup possible under the auspices of external forces, and will it open the way to separatism?
Do you see how much the question arises if you depart from the doctrine of "my land - my rules"? The ground under your feet has a habit of falling down if someone digs long enough.
That's exactly you want to cut things down fast, at the root, so there is no digging being done and no accentuation of existing ethnic conflicts.
Majority rule is not supremacy, BTW. You simply set the rules within your home.
To maintain the given example, because it's very similar to Russia, Hungarians in parts of the collapsed former Austria-Hungarian Empire, like Slovakia, Serbia etc. should act like minorities that are in a foreign land that they are not entitled to. They often don't, and Orban at times tries to piss off his neighbors with pics of Greater Hungary and other BS.
Autonomy should always be out of the question, especially for peoples that were at war before. Only integration and in time assimilation should be the offered paths.
Behave well, and you should be treated with great hospitality, as long as you recognize your status as a minority. Behave badly and the majority should treat you like rebellious children.
And no government is "stable', nor is is it supposed to be stable, like in NK or Iran or Russia. Only retards accept dictatorships. High IQ peoples should desire leadership that is vulnerable at all times to popular revolt in case they are not representing the democratic will of the people.
It has to stay as much as possible at my land my rules, and at international recognition, to prevent countries like Russia, Hungary and all other irredentists from chimping out and provoking war.
Compromise cannot really be a thing unless these minorities have something valuable to offer to the majority, it's the basis for negotiation. Yet minorities always WANT things, and give nothing in return, at worst you get terrorism like in Spain and Ireland and the sort, fuck that shit.
Let majorities do their natural thing, be it ethnic groups, be it cisheterosexuals and more.
