World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

The Overclass want to lord over a slave caste of drooling, bug-eating, lobotomized minions.
Even the usual ugliness of modern architecture and infrastructure seems to play into how tyranny wants to lord it over a cybernetic hive of soy serfs - like "brutalism".

Looks like "brutalist" architecture was invented by someone who liked the idea of people being like the Borg IRL.
Brutalism was a brainchild of Le Corbusier. [...] He also insisted massive construction - i.e. buildings ought to be massive anthills, machines for living, where human ants toil and exist collectively. He disdained any individuality, any personal touch, any vanity, any desire to be anything but a small cogwheel in the grand machinery of society.

It also looks like Le Corbusier was autistic.
When one recalls Le Corbusier’s remark about reinforced concrete—“my reliable, friendly concrete”—one wonders if he might have been deeply Autistic: that he knew that people talked, walked, slept, and ate, but had no idea that anything went on in their heads, or what it might be, and consequently treated them as if they were mere things.

(source: Susanna Viljanen's answer to Why is Brutalism (architectural style) so unpopular and often disliked (specifically among non-architects)? - Quora)
 
Last edited:
Yep, transhumanism. It's like I've been saying this whole time. The Overclass want to lord over a slave caste of drooling, bug-eating, lobotomized minions.

View attachment 3813852
Part of the reason to push the Anti-White propaganda. Water down the gene pool and make a class of dumb mixed race mutts. INB4 1488.
 
Germany and Europe are apparently moving towards introducing "digital cash", some form of purely digital currency that shills tell us will totally never not replace actual cash and totally never not be used as a tool of control.
Because the last two years showed how reliable such proclaims are. "Well, the situation/science changed."
 
Even the usual ugliness of modern architecture and infrastructure seems to play into how tyranny wants to lord it over a cybernetic hive of soy serfs - like "brutalism".
Architecture, like any art, reflects the society that created it, and in particular the power within that society. Just like the dramatic whorls and curves of rococo art represent the most decadent of 18th century European nobles before even they started realizing they had to shape up (the style died in the 1760s, coincidentally when liberalism was becoming a stronger and stronger force), today we have this bizarre globohomo art and architecture.

The common building (Brutalism, International Style glass boxes, etc.) reflects our desire for "efficiency" and distaste of beauty (like, say, an Art Deco skyscraper, which don't exist now because they're "too expensive"). The most dramatic skyscrapers are simply generic pastiches of "futurism" ripped from science fiction or more frequently like in the case of London's skyline, horrifying, twisted abominations that like our popular movies and TV shows, are subversions for subversions' sake. "Beauty" must be twisted in this day and age apparently.

There's no solving it until we get rid of this bizarre drive for "efficiency" (which is insanely hypocritical from the people who want to export our supply chains globally and use inefficient solar/wind power without backups). Because of "efficiency", we can't have anyone innovate outside of the narrow lines they've drawn, nor can we have people create masterpieces in the vein that inspired them. That's too expensive, and "beauty" doesn't matter compared to saving the government money (so they can raise their salaries).
Le Corbusier was pissing off Parisians with his plan to turn Paris into a bughive before Klaus was even born
You can thank a certain Nazi general named Dietrich von Choltitz for that. He ignored Hitler's orders to level Paris as the Allies approached so Le Corbusier didn't have the chance to "reconstruct" the city.
Ironically all the Clown World anti-white propaganda and "social justice" was started by some white people (I think).
Some were white like Foucault, others like many of the Frankfurt School were Jews.
 
The common building (Brutalism, International Style glass boxes, etc.) reflects our desire for "efficiency" and distaste of beauty (like, say, an Art Deco skyscraper, which don't exist now because they're "too expensive").
there's that Borg thing again...

Also it reminds me of that big city I moved out of. Where I "lived" was like a big shopping center with no culture but consumerism.
 
Last edited:
Evelyn de Rothschild has gone to hell.


Dr5oLQJ8sfe6E_N0ZbQB55CuEowMDWFEj1YtlZ9Lrxg.jpg
 
Looks like those with the most wealth still haven't figured out how to achieve immortality.
 
Last edited:
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Begemot
I wish I knew for real what TPTB were up to.
I don't believe they are setting things in motion just to fuck with the little guy, because I don't think they care anough about the peasants to bother.
If the billionaires wanted money, they would just print more or hire someone to commit robberies.
I feel like I'm asking to have existance explained, so I'm not expecting an answer.
Just rambling.
I haven't read the next page (or few; I started writing this before the current Dong-Gone outages) in case everyone's about to mention what I think. This is a very long post so I decided to spoiler most of it.

Money only gets you so far in this world. By the time you reach a net worth like $500 million, there's nothing that isn't within your reach outside of the very limits of human ingenuity and stuff you can't own, like national monuments. Anything you can't afford, you can simply team-up with a similarly-rich investor and go halves. And that's boring.

Similarly, they feel very inconvenienced by the system that every person has to abide by. Do you really think the Epsteins enjoyed having to fly off to their faggoty little island every time they wanted to rape a kid? Fuck no. If they had the choice, they'd do it in their own backyard.

What they want is their own system, but the trouble is they can't declare any country their own personal sanctuary because eventually you'll have inquisitive tourists sticking their noses where they don't belong. What they'd really want is their own world. And therein lies the problem, since they don't have another world to fuck off to. So what they figured out they have to do is they've got to take our world, and put us on another. Again, we don't have a world other than our own, so they've had to come up with a compromise; another universe, that's much like ours from a superficial perspective, but we can access from our very own homes in order to own non-existent stuff. Perhaps it could be called something like a metaverse?

While that's going on, they can then make their moves to take over the world. BlackRock took the lead and bought up as much farmland as possible. But this didn't work on everyone. Many people already held a great deal of distrust which only strengthened when they began to notice one company was buying all the land. Same goes for all the food processing factory fires.

I feel relieved after realising in the past few years that simply killing everyone like a comic book villain is something these fucks would never actually do, because it's incredibly inconvenient for every party involved. Bodies have to be dragged out of properties, destroyed, and the places disinfected. And if the common people are around long enough to catch wind, it won't be a bloodless genocide on your side. A battle which you probably won't, but just might lose. And that's not a risk they want to take.

But the most important reason they'd never just kill everyone? Because that's free labour you're also killing. Why kill the people who could chauffeur you around, get your food for you, pour your drinks, light your cigars and defend you from the unwashed masses?

Don't get me wrong, the Georgia Guidestones (rest in piss) did advocate for a general population reduction. And they are figuring out ways to do this. My fringe theory in regards to COVID is that the whole "14 days" ploy was to weaken the population to a sufficient extent that they'd die from the common cold and the disease that the chinks promised would be deadly enough to wipe out potentially billions of people. The problem is, too many people were disobedient. They went outside, had walks, and continued to eat as they pleased. They kept their strength up, and in the end, nowhere near as many people died. And it didn't help that the disease they'd spent years engineering was a complete dud that killed a fraction of a fraction of what they'd originally envisioned.

And yes, they tried it again with the vaccine. Not every jab was a death jab, since obviously you'd foster severe distrust, but I'm fairly sure the gameplan was to weaponise an "improved" strain in older people or children that would do as the chinks initially promised. And again, it failed. A few thousand sacrificial lambs were supposed to spread a super-weaponised variant to gaslight the unvaxed into taking it out of guilt and having the "real" pandemic they had wanted since the end of 2019. Then they could fast-track the "true" vaccine and it would magically cure everyone, and the pharmacists and scientists would be the heroes and the anti-vaxers blamed for genocide. Once more, this didn't happen. So we had a weird mixture of vaccines that actually did do their job, and these intermediary "dirty" vaccines that cause blood clots and heart attacks.

So now, they're hedging all their bets on climate alarmism. They dangled the carrot and stick, and a disappointingly low number of us took the bait. They thought they could buy our loyalty out of the "goodness" of their hearts, and we threw it back in their face. So instead they're seeking to punish us. They're consciously destroying our economy, removing countries' energy independence and driving up the prices of everything, and blaming it all on climate change.

Cars are the invention they regret the most. Had they known what would have become of it from the start, they would have orchestrated the whole EV push in the '70s, and as soon as tracking devices became viable, they'd have computerised everything to make sure you could track every last movement and manually shut an offender's vehicle down. As they stand, cars are what the elites fear the most. They are a relatively untrackable means of transport that can be wholly owned by their driver and allows them to go anywhere they want. Groups of people in cars can organise in far-away locations and scheme against the elite. They never want another Canadian trucker strike to happen ever again.
They don't want everyone to die, because then that defeats the purpose. They need a serf class of a few hundred million people.

The whole reason the pod-living, bug-munching, car-less society is being heavily promoted is because they are getting your coops set up for you. Once you've forfeited everything, you will have nothing else to live for but your master's interests. And that makes you more willing to work.

And of course, they've diversified their portfolio by discouraging procreation as much as they can. From abortion, to trooning out your kids, to making them feel shame for wanting to continue their bloodline. The second best option to outright genocide is clandestine genocide.
 
Back