Thorn
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
You can't shit yourself if you don't wear pants, stalker child.Pat doesn't shit himself though, that we know of.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't shit yourself if you don't wear pants, stalker child.Pat doesn't shit himself though, that we know of.
God forbid a historical train gets destroyed, his autism will explode.
You can't shit yourself if you don't wear pants, stalker child.
I wish there was a Patrick S. Tomlinson's Guilty Conscience twitter parody account that did nothing but apologize for his abhorrent behavior on Elon's platform:Patrick S. Tomlinson's Mustang would make for a good twitter parody.
Wonder if he’ll try to hit on the widows of the pilots? He’s classy like that."physically ill" because a plane crashed. not because at least two people died, but because two old planes were lost. no, child, there are none in museums and they weren't mass-produced in the first place, stalker.
View attachment 3853944
Wrong in every detail, child.the B-17 that was lost wasn't even historically significant, never saw combat. Was only relevant because it was flightworthy.
It's one of the 39 left in the United States and one of eight that could still fly. Last one crashed in 2019.the B-17 that was lost wasn't even historically significant, never saw combat. Was only relevant because it was flightworthy.
I’d love to know whether those “multiple fraudulent credit cards” show charges for the same holidays he posted boastful pictures of. Go on piggy, share some details. I bet he just opened credit cards and maxed them out, with Plan A to be to just pretend it wasn’t him, and Plan B to be to declare bankruptcy like Big Nikki already has at least once.View attachment 3855870View attachment 3855873![]()
Patrick S. Tomlinson on Twitter: "This is Twitter under @elonmusk. A …
archived 13 Nov 2022 04:11:02 UTCarchive.ph
Hasn't he already sent his ID to twitter to be verified? Not to mention he has threatened to sue them twice.View attachment 3855870View attachment 3855873![]()
Patrick S. Tomlinson on Twitter: "This is Twitter under @elonmusk. A …
archived 13 Nov 2022 04:11:02 UTCarchive.ph
The dude paid $5,000 for his twitter account back. Possibly even twice. He only admitted to it once but he was suspended and reversed twice so I assume its $5k a pop. But he “made it back in weeks”. Hes got no problems sending them his social security number and DNA.Hasn't he already sent his ID to twitter to be verified? Not to mention he has threatened to sue them twice.
So pay $8, doofus.View attachment 3855870![]()
Patrick S. Tomlinson on Twitter: "This is Twitter under @elonmusk. A …
archived 13 Nov 2022 04:11:02 UTCarchive.ph
All I hear are whiny baby noises.
I think it was three times. There were two in 2022, if I remember correctly.The dude paid $5,000 for his twitter account back. Possibly even twice. He only admitted to it once but he was suspended and reversed twice so I assume its $5k a pop. But he “made it back in weeks”. Hes got no problems sending them his social security number and DNA.
If Section 230 was repealed Patirck would just no longer be able to post on Twitter if Twitter even somehow stayed in operation. And amazingly in that entire list of things there wasn't a single one he'd be able to sue Elon Musk for other people doing such as committing identity theft or feloniously taking pictures of his house from across the street. None of these take place on Twitter, Patirck, that's not Section 230 that's just how liability works!View attachment 3855870View attachment 3855873![]()
Patrick S. Tomlinson on Twitter: "This is Twitter under @elonmusk. A …
archived 13 Nov 2022 04:11:02 UTCarchive.ph
He'll start hitting on the windows first. Remember, one of his teachers said that he'd argue with a fence post.Wonder if he’ll try to hit on the widows of the pilots? He’s classy like that.
Don't be silly. The only thing he's learned is that the SFWA won't cough up another hundred grand for him to sue someone.I really don't see any way to read these tweets other than saying that the only reason he hasn't hit Elon Musk with a frivolous lawsuit already is because of what he's personally learned about Section 230 (correctly or not) from his other frivolous lawsuits.
Two haikus for FatDon't be silly. The only thing he's learned is that the SFWA won't cough up another hundred grand for him to sue someone.
Dude, that's like two beers at Hooligan's each month! He has priorities!So pay $8, doofus.