Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are now reports of some stray Russian missiles striking a Polish town, Przewodów, in the border with Ukraine.

So far, two polish civvies dead.

Archive pending

Get your gas masks and canned food ready, kiwisisters.


UPDATE:
The Pentagon is unable to confirm the reports of Russian missiles crossing the Polish border.

Some Polish news outlets are only confirming an explosion on the town, the article says it happened near a grain silo | Article is in Polish, I had to use Brave's translator function to read it, so the translation might be shitty, if any Polish speaking kiwi can double check the local media or this article, ping/PM me and I'll update the post | Archive

These archives also pending Someone already archived the polish news article. Pending archive on the Pentagon link. Archive.ph is very slow today.

Some pictures of the strike:



So I decided to look into the Article 5 description on the official NATO website.

Collective defence and Article 5

Article 5

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.”

Article 61

“For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.”

And saw these two interesting tidbits lol.

Screenshot 2022-11-15 115531.png
Screenshot 2022-11-15 115555.png

This Article 5 sounds like a meme at this point, like how many citizens of this democracy misunderstand how impeachment works.

And it was used for the first time in 2001 against goat herders in the mountains of Afghanistan.
 
It seems that the commando attack on the Kinburn peninsula ended in disaster, according to many channels reporting the attack (like DPA) Not surprising, honestly, it was a suicide mission to go on the offensive there without heavy equipment or possibility of resupply.

Just another in many failed amphibious attacks by Ukraine.

Which is interesting, because according to Russian sources there's been no Ukranian attempts period. Certainly in the last 24 hours there's been zero Ukranians anywhere near Kinburn.

If it was so utterly disasterous as some claim then the Russians would be parading it around, surely? They need the win, after all.
 
It also matches the look of a KH-55/KH-555 missiles ( perhaps even more so )

ALSO, Russians have been launching tons of surface to air missiles ( S-300 ) on surface targets

Your theory of this being a false flag done by a truck loaded with explosives is what i found incredibly retarded when its clearly a missile impact
This could be stray KH-55/KH-555's, stray S-300 or a fault in a S-300 air defence missile from Ukraine

With the subpar quality of the old systems, Russians corruption and their consistency in inadequate maintenance of their weapon systems i see all three as very possible explanations
If you seriously believe that you can 100% tell the difference between a truck-based explosive charge and a missile strike just from a couple of grainy photos, then you must be even more fucking retarded than you usually sound. Now fuck off back to Reddit, NAFO is missing a tranny.
 
To the retards trying to cope by saying it was a Russian S-300 that they fired in ground attack mode, the maximum range of the S-300 is 150km.

Are there Russian forces within 150km of Przewoduv? No. Cope and seethe.

Edit: Not even 150km.
At the time, Belarus was known to use the S-300PS (NATO codename SA-10 Grumble) version of the system, introduced in the mid-1980s and which includes 5V55R missiles which a maximum engagement range of up to 56 miles against aerial targets. The Naviny article states that the maximum range of the (Belarusian) S-300 against ground targets is 75 miles, being limited by the guidance system, rather than the propulsion.

So the maximum theoretical range of S-300 for ground attack is 75 miles, which is 120km.
 
Last edited:
If you seriously believe that you can 100% tell the difference between a truck-based explosive charge and a missile strike just from a couple of grainy photos, then you must be even more fucking retarded than you usually sound. Now fuck off back to Reddit, NAFO is missing a tranny.
Everyone wants to be the next BrownMoses and get a cut of those sweet sweet State Department bux.
 
NOOOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN UKRAINERINOS!!!!!!!!!

That's it, I fucking hate Russians. Fuck Russians, I'll bash their fuckin heads in to help those poor Ukrainians and get lots of updoots from my fellow redditors. That'll show them.

But first I need to ask, will there be HRT available over in Ukraine? It's very important so that I don't get Gender Dysphoria while in combat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back