Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

They believe they would be like their idol losing weight by just walking to the local salted meat and bread store.
View attachment 3870690
They have no idea how calorie deficits work or care to follow them. They can't fathom using THEIR yards to create "untouched" forest appearance. They bitch about their neighbors "not using their lawns to exercise in public." Every single statement made using the term "car brain" that has been posted and I've seen is looking outward. None of these comments are self reflective.

This is another sub that SHOULD be full of these people, but isn't. https://www.reddit.com/r/NoLawns/
Unlike /r/fuckcars, /r/nolawns actually has people who practice what they preach. The typical suburban lawn is mainly present for vanity and serves little to no ecological purpose. Tearing up the lawn and replacing it with plants like clover (which bees love) can support insect ecosystems, which in turn support adjacent local wildlife populations such as birds. In places such as California with watering restrictions, replacing lawns with native species cuts down on water usage. Additionally, no lawns means people don't have to mow them or waste money on fertilizers trying to make it the greenest piece of land on the block.

In other words, people in /r/nolawns actually touch grass. /R/fuckcars just is people whining.
 
/n/ of all 4chan boards turned me onto this YouTube video. The context is that it's Extinction Rebellion blocking traffic in Cuck-anada but then won't let a woman on a bicycle go through. When she tells them that she rides a bicycle (and thus not polluting like cars do), they tell her she should've saved up for a bus.


In addition to zoning, the faux-libertarian crap that a lot of them spew revolves around "Bicycles don't need licensing or registration, I'm free from the Man", when they don't realize that if the anti-car people have their way, they'll double down on bicycles, as this Canuck learned the hard way.
 
They have no idea how calorie deficits work or care to follow them. They can't fathom using THEIR yards to create "untouched" forest appearance.
To be fair most of these guys live in suburbia and have HOAs to deal with who would definitely not like a forest suddenly appearing in someone's front yard.
 
Nobody in car-dependent suburbia walks their dogs:
1668626735924.png
A /r/dogfree user complains about annoying dogs, only to get told by OP that children are far worse:
1668626789702.png
Source (Archive)
 
Last edited:
Why are all these types the exact same? No fun, no family, no pets, nothing. They're absolutely terrifying for how they seem to loathe literally everything people enjoy for no reason other than being loud. It's especially strange to me in terms of the r/childfree types because those people were kids too. All of us were loud and annoying as shit as kids, it's called growing up, but among Redditors and this particular type of person, maturity seems rare.
 
Nobody in car-dependent suburbia walks their dogs:
View attachment 3876450
A /r/dogfree user complains about annoying dogs, only to get told by OP that children are far worse:
View attachment 3876453
Source (Archive)
I'm not surprised they think of dogs like most urban bug people, basically as surrogate children.

I don't live in a """walkable""" area (certainly not by these peoples' standards) but dogs are extremely commonplace. Not only are these dogs not all friendly, but I'll take kids over dogs. Kids aren't known for shitting on sidewalks (unless you have some particularly awful third-worlders moving in, but I digress), and I never have to worry about some child running up to me and taking a bite of my leg.

Both dogs and children would live healthier, more fulfilling lives with a yard, but these fucks hate yards too.
 
There are a lot of things wrong with that, but the most important one is how out of touch these people are. If you have a car, you also almost certainly have a washer and dryer. They have compact ones that can be stuck in a regular apartment closet—of course, if your apartment isn't much bigger than a closet, you have a problem. If you're already paying out the nose and the apartment doesn't have a common laundromat...then you have a big problem.

If his ass goes splat in the street, I'd laugh.

Based on the over-decorated wall and pink items mixed in, this is a woman. Given how disgusting laundromats are and what sort of people they attract, before proudly proclaiming how being #carfree is cool, she'd better check to make sure that she has the same number of panties coming home with her as when she left.
 
Based on the over-decorated wall and pink items mixed in, this is a woman. Given how disgusting laundromats are and what sort of people they attract, before proudly proclaiming how being #carfree is cool, she'd better check to make sure that she has the same number of panties coming home with her as when she left.
You're correct. From her post history:
1668699822334.png
Source (Archive)
 
You're correct. From her post history:
View attachment 3881043
Source (Archive)
The cause of all these peoples problems are staring them right in the face, but they cannot admit it.

So they lash out against cars, hoping that if everyone were forced to use the stuff they use, it would become better somehow.

This lady could move to a small community anywhere, have an apartment with a built-in laundry or a house near a laundromat, and walk everywhere, but nooooo, that would mean giving up on the urban hellhole itself.
 
/r/fuckcars can't stop talking about sex:
1668733232500.png
1668733241914.png
First of all, that's only a small part of Collin County, which should be obvious (the small shaded area with a red outline is the census tract (archive) shown in the OP):
1.png
Or not:
1668733444510.png
1668733495060.png
1668733666480.png
1668733880209.png
A county is huge, how can anyone look at that picture of a single neighborhood and think it is an entire county?
Also, I didn't know it was possible to be this coombrained.
1668733420589.png
1668733553088.png
1668733579944.png
1668736104111.png
1668733563351.png

1668733473534.png
1668733464197.png
1668733594561.png
("NNN" is "No Nut November")
Apparently /r/fuckgolfcourses (actually /r/FuckGolf) is a thing:
1668733808059.png
Dallas-Fort Worth doesn't have a water shortage, and not every golf course is a billionaire's country club:
1668733838940.png
1668736062813.png

Now onto an analysis of the neighborhood, since this was posted on /r/fuckcars to showcase how terrible it is. I'm using the fact that the census tract boundaries are arbitrary and not representative of the area as a whole as an excuse to show how /r/fuckcars is full of crap when they claim that kids in suburban neighborhoods are trapped at home with nothing to do because they need their parents to drive them everywhere.

1668733918385.png
If only they'd thought of that... Hilariously, all the local roads have speed limits of 30 mph and half the neighborhood is a school zone with a speed limit of 20 mph (the main roads are 40 when not in a school zone). The golf course is full of cut through trails, and every road has a sidewalk:
1668734061264.png1668734347175.png1668735822519.png1668734428622.png1668735785462.png

Every kid in the neighborhood is within walking distance of a school, and no one cares if people bike on the sidewalk as long as they yield to pedestrians.

The stores in the corner of the OP are a 30 minute walk/9 minute bike ride/4 minute drive away from the center of the neighborhood:
2.png
Within a half-an-hour walk, there are many golf courses, multiple non-golf course parks, many lakes, over a dozen restaurants, a ice cream parlor, coffee shops, three large grocery stores, a gym, multiple pharmacies, multiple banks, multiple dentist office, a pediatric clinic, a vet, an urgent care clinic (and many more health clinics), a jeweler, eyelash salon, spa, shoe store, multiple kickboxing/martial arts gyms, a pet groomer, musical instrument store, UPS store, post office, a public library, several churches, several of the aforementioned schools (there are more schools on the north side and inside the neighboring neighborhoods). A little farther out (but within easy biking distance) is a large YMCA type facility with a small water park, 10 baseball fields, 11 tennis courts, Olympic pool, indoor basketball, soccer, volleyball courts, and more:

1668735134369.png
Activities offered at one of the "YMCA" buildings
1668735283494.png
The other building contains an indoor pool with an American Ninja Warrior-style obstacle course, as well as a weight room and indoor track:
1668736524616.png
Also within biking distance is a trampoline park.

In the top left corner near the schools, there is a massive mixed-use apartment complex:
1668734980022.png
And that's just the stuff within biking/long walk distance.
Within a 15-20 minute drive there is too much stuff to even mention.

Now, the vast majority of the people who live in this neighborhood will drive to things. But if you're a /r/fuckcars member who lives in your suburban boomer parents' basement, you could easily walk/bike to a large number of things to do. If you're a kid and bored in this neighborhood, you are boring. Yes, there is less stuff to walk to than there is in Midtown Manhattan or Zone 1 in London, but there is more than enough to do. Since there are so many schools in the neighborhood, it is likely that all of your friends live close by.

Oh never mind, there's nothing to do:
1668736773259.png
1668736084184.png

Source (Archive)
 
Last edited:
Unlike /r/fuckcars, /r/nolawns actually has people who practice what they preach. The typical suburban lawn is mainly present for vanity and serves little to no ecological purpose. Tearing up the lawn and replacing it with plants like clover (which bees love) can support insect ecosystems, which in turn support adjacent local wildlife populations such as birds. In places such as California with watering restrictions, replacing lawns with native species cuts down on water usage. Additionally, no lawns means people don't have to mow them or waste money on fertilizers trying to make it the greenest piece of land on the block.

In other words, people in /r/nolawns actually touch grass. /R/fuckcars just is people whining.
/r/nolawns is more about replacing a front lawn with wildflowers and natural plants, or xeriscaping, or turning it into a garden somehow, and making it actually attractive or unique.

When /r/fuckcars whines about lawns, they're not talking about "replacing it with something more useful", it's "why do you have a setback at all". I remember reading a website about an inner city neighborhood where some of the century-old homes, now being gentrified (instead of the falling apart cheap rentals they were in the 1960s) had fences behind them, with the author accused them of being too "conservative" by using the fences. They weren't--it was one of the bluest parts of the city, but maybe they just wanted drunks, hobos, and drunk hobos to stop sleeping on the porch.

Even if you still transformed the lawn, they won't be happy with it.
 
In other words, people in /r/nolawns actually touch grass but would prefer not to. /R/fuckcars just is people whining.
Slight "correction" to a top-tier post, lol.

Seriously, when do you ever see anyone on r/fuckcars post about anything they've done that makes their or others' lives better? (I'm not counting the absurd and unsafe "alternative transportation" shit like the box-on-a-skateboard posted above).

This is the fundamental difference between this Urbanist herd and the people on r/nolawns.
 
Last edited:
Their much lauded "war on cars" is lucky it's one sided because hot rodders aren't like gun guys eagerly forfeiting right to try and convince Karen they won't mass shooter their spoiled crotchspawn- Royal Oak enacted a bunch of ordinances to try and stick it to the Woodward dream cruise a few years back and the car guy response was to knock the mufflers off and caravan directly through Royal Oak on their way to M1. I'm dying for a video to come out where some yuppy extinction rebellion type blocks traffic in front of a 1320 boy and he decides to put his heap on the trans brake and two step to scare the shit out of them.
 
/r/nolawns is more about replacing a front lawn with wildflowers and natural plants, or xeriscaping, or turning it into a garden somehow, and making it actually attractive or unique.

When /r/fuckcars whines about lawns, they're not talking about "replacing it with something more useful", it's "why do you have a setback at all". I remember reading a website about an inner city neighborhood where some of the century-old homes, now being gentrified (instead of the falling apart cheap rentals they were in the 1960s) had fences behind them, with the author accused them of being too "conservative" by using the fences. They weren't--it was one of the bluest parts of the city, but maybe they just wanted drunks, hobos, and drunk hobos to stop sleeping on the porch.

Even if you still transformed the lawn, they won't be happy with it.
which is sad because I'd have ZERO problem with ZERO setbacks, front yards don't do shit in many areas and having more backyard would be nice.

people understandably want houses to look "similarish" but I have no problem with something like this:

1668796077941.png

even if the road is wider or (gasp) a stroad. The classic roman villa with a hole in the center of the block is pretty cool.
 
/r/fuckcars user needs to walk a mile
the-humanity.png

Let's find out why...
the-irony.png

Why does he need a new car?
car-brain.png
Looks like we've found the most reasonable user on /r/fuckcars as well as the most hypocritical. That's not very fuckcars-y of you dpsayles, have you thought about a bike instead?

And some big brain in the comments made a realization...
wow.png
Yes, we literally are the UNITED STATES that together form a country. I don't know what point they're even trying to make, I guess a picture of a street without a sidewalk means the country doesn't function.

source [archive]
 
Back