Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

[PointOfNoReturnPoint]

You know, reading the "dog hair" story reminds me of the examples found in the essay "The Missing Missing Reasons." (It's an old Reddit favorite.)

TL;DR version: When individual narcissists lose an argument in real life, they'll go out and get validation by smearing their opponents in front of their friendly Internet followers. When they do this, they tend to follow a consistent pattern: They'll always leave out the main argument presented by the opposing party, and fixate on certain details without providing the necessary context (like "dog hair") to make their opponents seem irrational or unhinged. (They, of course, present themselves as the calm, rational parties.) Liz's "consent accident" victim told him exactly what happened that made her feel violated -- but Liz pretends to not have been told this. Make no mistake, though -- he was.

Because Liz won't mention the entire tale, I'm going to try to put it together using the clues provided:

I assume that the victim became incapacitated when Liz was present. When she woke up, Liz claimed that nothing out of the ordinary happened while she was out. However, Liz was done in by the tell-tale dog hair . . .

If you own a pet that sheds, you know that hair can get on your furniture. As a result, it can get on your clothing and it can transfer to the clothing and furniture of others. Do you know where it doesn't go? On your underwear, and certainly not inside of it. The only way it would get there is if you were disrobed in a "consent accident."

When Liz was confronted with this, he realized he was caught. When the story started to make the rounds and he knew it would get back to him, he went to the Internet to throw as much misdirection as possible to his Twitter followers -- using the same techniques outlined in the essay. However, if he was innocent of this he wouldn't need to do that -- let alone "regret it for the rest of [his] life." All he would have to do is to tell the full story.

Where in this thread can I find the details on this whole story. I am tangentially following dong gone due to him being related to Keffals.

 

[Sithis]

I haven't been ITT in a while but I just find it so hilarious that admitted rapist Liz Fong-Jones started this farce with 6 and a half years of perpetual stalking and lies about this place, only to give Josh the autistic resolve to resist his digital rape attempts and strengthen the site further. Not only that but Liz Fong-Jones, an admitted rapist employed by Honeycomb.io, has forgotten to bury his own secrets well enough and this has resulted in further scrutiny of Honeycomb.io and their untrustworthy and shady business practices. I am excited to see how it goes in the future but if I was Honeycomb.io the first step I would take in trying to repair my reputation would be terminating the employment of confessed rapist Liz Fong-Jones.

 

[ForTheHoard]

I don't even understand the Consent Accident dog story.

Elliot was accused of something akin to sexual assault, but I don't think anyone has been able to find the original accusation. It's likely deleted or was scrubbed by an ally. Whatever the accusation was, LFJ felt compelled to address it publicly and give his side of the story, but he never repeated the initial accusation. He said he had a sexual encounter with a woman(?) that may have been a coworker, and that coworker had a significant phobia of dogs. LFJ claimed to have had an unknown amount of dog hair on their clothing during the encounter, and the presence of that hair caused his partner to revoke consent at some point during the sex act. During his version of the story, he explained the whole ordeal as a "consent accident."

Again, that's Elliot's side of the story without any context of knowing the original accusation. It sounds like a pretty ridiculous story, but nobody really knows since it's clown world and people have accused others of rape for less. Either way, it's going to be heavily biased in his favor, so whatever happened was surely worse than what we know. The term "consent accident" is catching on because it sounds like something a rapist would say.

 

[Stop Sign]

You know, reading the "dog hair" story reminds me of the examples found in the essay "The Missing Missing Reasons." (It's an old Reddit favorite.)

TL;DR version: When individual narcissists lose an argument in real life, they'll go out and get validation by smearing their opponents in front of their friendly Internet followers. When they do this, they tend to follow a consistent pattern: They'll always leave out the main argument presented by the opposing party, and fixate on certain details without providing the necessary context (like "dog hair") to make their opponents seem irrational or unhinged. (They, of course, present themselves as the calm, rational parties.) Liz's "consent accident" victim told him exactly what happened that made her feel violated -- but Liz pretends to not have been told this. Make no mistake, though -- he was.

Because Liz won't mention the entire tale, I'm going to try to put it together using the clues provided:

I assume that the victim became incapacitated when Liz was present. When she woke up, Liz claimed that nothing out of the ordinary happened while she was out. However, Liz was done in by the tell-tale dog hair . . .

If you own a pet that sheds, you know that hair can get on your furniture. As a result, it can get on your clothing and it can transfer to the clothing and furniture of others. Do you know where it doesn't go? On your underwear, and certainly not inside of it. The only way it would get there is if you were disrobed in a "consent accident."

When Liz was confronted with this, he realized he was caught. When the story started to make the rounds and he knew it would get back to him, he went to the Internet to throw as much misdirection as possible to his Twitter followers -- using the same techniques outlined in the essay. However, if he was innocent of this he wouldn't need to do that -- let alone "regret it for the rest of [his] life." All he would have to do is to tell the full story.

Don't know how I missed this, it's brilliant deductive work.
At first, I thought that the dog hair thing was something completely made up by Roblox Fong Jones, but your reconstruction of the events make perfectly sense. And Elliot having such an inflated ego makes completely possible that he inadvertently gave out clues about what happened.

Some years ago I read some lore about the Riddler (Batman's villain), in which it was said that he was compelled to tell the truth because of a very strict education. Because of this, every time he committed a crime he left some clues in order to silence that part of him that wanted to admit the truth. When I read your post, I immediately thought this about Liz.

 

[Dread First]

Some years ago I read some lore about the Riddler (Batman's villain), in which it was said that he was compelled to tell the truth because of a very strict education. Because of this, every time he committed a crime he left some clues in order to silence that part of him that wanted to admit the truth. When I read your post, I immediately thought this about Liz.

Dynastic Chinese history has no shortage of examples where imperial court eunuchs engaged in power politics to achieve their own agendas. Let's just say that the more "legalist" the time period, the more influential the eunuchs were.

Elliot is no Edward Nigma; he's Liz Fong-Jones, a rapist who rapes women.

 

[A Sunset]

Enjoy.
View attachment 3891873

View attachment 3891891

Consent accidents going mainstream.

V on Twitter: "@Wightout66 again, I would hope anyone would find it i…

archived 19 Nov 2022 06:02:50 UTC

archive.ph

View attachment 3891960

Dr. Alaric Naudé (기린/麒麟/ᡴᡳᠯᡳᠨ) on Twitter: ""Consent accident" a very…

보관 2022년 11월 11일 05:16:38 UTC

archive.ph

View attachment 3891966View attachment 3891969View attachment 3891972View attachment 3891975

Tabi on Twitter: "Now there are people who want to normalize rape by …

archived 19 Nov 2022 06:08:48 UTC

archive.ph

View attachment 3891984

Liz Fong-Jones explains to a large group of women why him wanting to asphyxiate a woman with a plastic bag is like, totally healthy kink play, and how he would love to be a prostitute. He ends the presentation explain the sorely needed context behind his "consent accident", which was OK because Liz Fong Jone's rape of his female co-worker in Zurich had something do with dog hair.

Liz Fong-Jones, employed as Field CTO at Honeycomb.IO, was very excited to talk to a bunch of natal women about his love of asphixiating women to death, and his rape of a female co-worker in Zurich (which he calls a consent accident). LesbiansWHOtech welcomed the rapist Liz Fong-Jones and his explanation of his consent accident/rape.

 

[One87five0]

I will never understand why some cows feel the need to acknowledge this site and antagonize its users. If I woke up tomorrow and noticed someone created a thread about me, I would ignore it completely. I'm confident that Dylan Mulvaney is aware of his thread, but he's smart enough not to bring it up or poke the hornets nest. Yes, we still laugh at his antics as they unfold, but nobody has gone out of their way to dig up any real dirt on his past in order to destroy his reputation, because he hasn't put out a fatwa against us. People like Elliot and Lucas "Keffals" Roberts went out of their way to not only draw attention to the forum, but to provoke its users and its owner. They both practically begged for their own threads. Instead of ignoring us or locking down their social media accounts until we lost interest, they doubled down. You brought this on yourself, Liz Fong-Jones, field CTO of honeycomb.io. The brick faced eunuch didn't leave twitter because of Elon; he left twitter because we exposed his sex crimes and he failed to kill the site, and slinked away in shame.

 

[0 0]

Can we get a poll whether anyone believes the Consent Accident dog hair story?

"No" will win by a landslide.

 

[AltisticRight]

Liz Fong-Jones 方禮真 Elliot Rogers 艾略特羅傑斯 consent accident 強姦 rapist 強姦犯 tranny 藥娘 TiM crime statistics 人妖犯罪數據 estradiol 雌二醇 dog hair 狗毛 banned 封殺 American Chinese 美籍華人 resides in Canada and Australia 常駐澳加 CloudFlare DDoS 雲彩DDoS platform of paedophiles and terrorists 戀童癖和恐怖分子的平台 BDSM 施虐者與被虐者 incel 因塞爾 crossdresser 跨性別打扮 eunuch 太監 honeycomb.io 蜂窩點io field CTO 現場首席技術官 racist 種族主義者 womaniser 物化女性 LGBTQAISS++ 辣雞變態艾滋病白左群體 Matthew Prince 馬修普林斯 tranny chaser 藥娘嗜好 ex-google employee 前谷歌員工 autogynephile 跨性性愛癖 occasionally happen 時常發生 ontologically evil 邪惡本體 colleague rape 強姦同事 harasser 騷擾者 stalker 跟踪狂 twitter blue checkmark 推特傻逼證明 Kevin Fong 凱文方 democrat lawyer 民豬黨律師 disowned child 斷絕父子關係 you will never be a woman 你永遠都不會變成女性 Elliot Fong 艾略特方

 

[AnOminous]

Can we get a poll whether anyone believes the Consent Accident dog hair story?

I believed the part where he admitted he did something sexual to someone without their consent, which is to say, that he is by his own admission a rapist, whether he chooses to call it something asinine like a "consent accident" or not.

 

[AltisticRight]

I believed the part where he admitted he did something sexual to someone without their consent, which is to say, that he is by his own admission a rapist, whether he chooses to call it something asinine like a "consent accident" or not.

He said "occasionally happen" too.
This isn't his first and will not be his last rape. This freak spado in a dress is a serial raping menace.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Do you think that the rapist employing Honeycomb.io has a sign in their workplaces that says "Days since a consent accident: 0" due to employing rapist Liz Fong-Jones as their Field CTO despite his history of committing rape and sexual assault then publicly smearing the accusers and trying to delete any website that mentions that Liz Fong-Jones rapes and sexually assaults people?

 

[Big Al's Famous Pork]

Does this sham of a company selling useless shit even have a workplace or physical offices?

 

[Kees H]

This appeared yesterday on their Glassdoor reviews, stating that they pay people not to leave negative reviews, or to leave positive reviews rofl. Fucking hilarious to see insiders at his failing company describing what we were guessing what was going on from just watching this mentally disabled troon.


Archive: https://archive.ph/9obKG

 

[AnOminous]

Does this sham of a company selling useless shit even have a workplace or physical offices?

If they do probably half the rooms in it are blood spattered dilation stations.

 

[AltisticRight]

 

[Heckler1]

If they do probably half the rooms in it are blood spattered dilation stations.

And Elliot's Consent Accident Dungeons.

 

[A Sunset]

This appeared yesterday on their Glassdoor reviews, stating that they pay people not to leave negative reviews, or to leave positive reviews rofl. Fucking hilarious to see insiders at his failing company describing what we were guessing what was going on from just watching this mentally disabled troon.

View attachment 3897477
Archive: https://archive.ph/9obKG

“Colleagues are openly hating on entire groups of the population, open discussion of sexual stuff, if you say something about it you get called names by colleauges.”

Gee, who does this remind me of. What a shock that a serial rapist and open degenerate like Liz Fong-Jones is employed at Honeycomb.io.

I bet the staff wouldn’t even give a fuck about him being a rapist. They’d probably help him cover for it, I’ve seen it a million times. Honeycomb.io does not care about employing self-admitted rapists like Liz Fong-Jones, and their serial harassment of companies and women.

 

[Big Al's Famous Pork]

If you cut your dick off you are allowed to sexually harass coworkers and society must accept it.

 

[Positron]

I don't know what business honeycomb.io does but I now I cannot think of honeycomb.io without thinking also of women being asphyxiated and raped.