- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
And your in bed with a pedo apoligest Kingwumpus
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And your in bed with a pedo apoligest Kingwumpus
Lmao, I know her.
She wrote some butthurt awful article on gamergate, got fired for it and went to reddit to cry.
![]()
She also blamed gained weight and blamed gamergate for it. No, really.
https://np.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/41klh2/my_personal_experiences_with_misogyny_sizism/
You could make an entire thread about her.
I present to you the esteemed gentlemen defending thou fair maiden. The Bearded Virgins of the Roundtable if you will.
Jeff Grubb tells the harrowing tale of Alison being attacked by a hate group.
![]()
Rich McCormick describes her essay as a "nuanced Western understanding of Japanese cultural norms"
![]()
Paul Tamburro categorizes the thesis as "Japan's right to uphold its own boundaries".
![]()
Sikandar Mahmood has a more nuanced take on her thesis: "she is against western dictatorship, pressure over Japan in this matter".
![]()
Mike McWhertor just ignores the thesis and says read Kotaku for why it isn't bad.
![]()
Sam Machkovech can't defend the thesis on his own so he also just links to Kotaku (almost like they all communicate behind the scenes on what to write).
![]()
Matthew Dunn uses Anita Sarkeesian as the voice of reason in his article which is almost identical to all the others.
![]()
Estrogen mostly, with a load of saltSo all the Nyberg shit and now this chick's terrible fucked up views have taught me is that I can be Anti-GG and probably get away with murder in their eyes
What is in the water in SJW town, they all seem to ignore blatant facts
So all the Nyberg shit and now this chick's terrible fucked up views have taught me is that I can be Anti-GG and probably get away with murder in their eyes
What is in the water in SJW town, they all seem to ignore blatant facts
From what I've seen these days, it feels like it's a requirement for these people. And if you don't look like a punchable, smug cunt, then you're not a true feminist.Do these dumb cunts all have to look like complete stereotypes?
Honestly, I'm kind of surprised she wasn't pulled into HR and given some sort of speech to the effect of "What the fuck were you thinking? That kind of thing is completely inappropriate for a publicly facing employee of Nintendo. You are obviously fired. Now, if you go quietly and don't cause a fuss, we'll attribute your termination to something relatively minor like moonlighting without approval so we can save face and you have a chance of getting a job somewhere else."
Or maybe she was, and doesn't completely comprehend "not causing a fuss"
I figured it was her mature photoshoots.I might have missed it, but did Rapp, at any point, disclose what second job she did? Articles have mostly been focusing on the supposed harrassment and hate, but only gave the smallest of lip service, if any, to Nintendo's actual reason for firing her.
Rapp whined that other Nintendo employees had on the side jobs, as well. That she's not forthcoming about her own, aside from simply mentioning she had one, says a lot about her own intent to massage the situation to her favor and a lack of personal responsibility even though she probably knew back then that what she did would run foul of Nintendo's terms of employment.
If anything, she really is a good PR person. She knows how to get a lot of white knights to do her bidding.
I figured it was her mature photoshoots.
Is there really, honestly any reason why Nintendo can't just come out and say that they fired her (at least in part) because she posted shit in favor of child porn distribution? They have got to have so much goddamned money. What sort of threat -- financially, in PR, or otherwise -- would a bunch of immature idiots screaming "GAMERGATE!!" possibly pose to them? A boycott from Rapp's defenders will obviously do nothing (assuming the eight people doing so would follow through with it -- which they couldn't), nor would any rational human being take her side if Nintendo just outright said that they fired her at least in part because of her views on advocating child pornography.
Please, some legal Kiwi come to my aid here. Is providing such clarity not worth the hassle it brings? Are there other factors I'm not considering? How could making the reasons for Rapp's firing clear do anything but help their publicity?
It's to save face so they don't have to openly say, "We hired a pedophile supporter to work with children." because that would look bad for their company's reputation and background checking abilities, and drive away potential investors and developers, as well as employees.Is there really, honestly any reason why Nintendo can't just come out and say that they fired her (at least in part) because she posted shit in favor of child porn distribution? They have got to have so much goddamned money. What sort of threat -- financially, in PR, or otherwise -- would a bunch of immature idiots screaming "GAMERGATE!!" possibly pose to them? A boycott from Rapp's defenders will obviously do nothing (assuming the eight people doing so would follow through with it -- which they couldn't), nor would any rational human being take her side if Nintendo just outright said that they fired her at least in part because of her views on advocating child pornography.
Please, some legal Kiwi come to my aid here. Is providing such clarity not worth the hassle it brings? Are there other factors I'm not considering? How could making the reasons for Rapp's firing clear do anything but help their publicity?
I think the consensus is that Nintendo doesn't want to admit they ever hired a child porn apologist in the first place, which would happen if they said why they fired her.